Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und Planung
Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (10)
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Institute
Keywords
- Städtebau (11)
- António de Oliveira Salazar (1)
- Cordoba (1)
- Denkmalpflege (1)
- Dictatorship (1)
- Duarte Pacheco (1)
- Encosta Da Ajuda/Restelo (1)
- Europe (1)
- Faria Da Costa (1)
- Fascism (1)
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
La prima edizione di questo testo è apparsa, in tedesco, nel volume II.2.: Anthologie zum Städtebau. Das Phänomen Großstadt und die Entstehung der Stadt der Moderne, a cura di Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani, Katia Frey, Eliana Perotti, con il sostegno di Departement Architektur der Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule, Zürich (Gebr. Mann Verlag, Berlin 2014, pp. 1307-1390). Previ specifici accordi con l’editore, viene qui presentata la versione originaria, in italiano, dell’intero capitolo: Modernität und Emphase. Städtebau im italienischen Faschismus, e comprendente: i) una capiente saggio introduttivo – in una versione più ampia ed articolata (comprensiva della “Bibliografia sistematica”, di riferimento) del testo in tedesco; ii) la versione in italiano del repertorio antologico di riferimento – e comprensiva di una “Scheda introduttiva”, sull’Autore-Opera, e di una selezione del testo in esame.
Granite on the Ground: Former Nazi Party Rally Grounds, Nuremberg/Germany. A brief introduction
(2015)
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
Córdoba es la segunda ciudad más poblada de la Argentina, y posee el ejido municipal más extenso del país, siendo un importante centro industrial y de servicios del centro del país. Es además la cabecera de la segunda región metropolitana argentina, el Área Metropolitana de Córdoba (AMCBA). Si bien el desarrollo de sus áreas centrales y periurbanas es un tema bastante desarrollado académicamente, actualmente hay un vacío de conocimiento en la situación actual de las áreas pericentrales e intermedias de esta ciudad -aun cuando ocupan más del 30% del área urbanizada y donde habita la mayor parte de su población-. Es en estas áreas donde se ubica el objeto de estudio de esta tesis: los barrios pericentrales que forman un anillo alrededor del área central. Originados como extensiones suburbanas alrededor de 1940, y consolidados como barrios residenciales de clase media y media alta de baja densidad antes de 1970, ocupan lo que son hoy algunas de las áreas con mejor calidad ambiental y urbana de la ciudad.
Los barrios pericentrales son considerados generalmente consolidados y estables; sin embargo, analizados en detalle, muestran complejas transformaciones: un vaciamiento poblacional constante, a pesar del crecimiento demográfico en general de Córdoba y el AMCBA; aumento de inmuebles abandonados; y a diferencia de sectores en una similar posición, no son objeto de grandes inversiones inmobiliarias de renovación urbana.
Esta situación es invisibilizada, en parte por ser resultado de procesos con poco impacto relativo en la ciudad, y en parte porque estos procesos no están contemplados por los modelos urbanos locales vigentes –basados en la teoría racionalista y determinista de principios del siglo XX-, que conceptualizan a los barrios pericentrales como una “panacea urbana”. Esta tesis puso en disputa estos modelos, partiendo de la discusión sobre un fenómeno informal detectado indefectiblemente (aunque no exclusivamente) en estos barrios pericentrales: la microdensificación emergente.
La imposibilidad de colocar los inmuebles existentes en el mercado hace que los propietarios busquen nuevas formas de valorizar sus propiedades, de facilitar el acceso a la vivienda a sus hijos o de invertir sus ahorros de forma segura, obteniendo una fuente adicional de ingresos: en cada parcela edificada se aumenta la cantidad de unidades funcionales, aprovechando la superficie construible vacante o refuncionalizando las construcciones obsoletas, aunque manteniendo el grano y la escala de intervención respecto al tejido existente. La oferta de hábitat en estos barrios se diversifica, y no sólo evita la expulsión de población, sino que también atrae a nuevos habitantes. Además, en un tejido originalmente sólo residencial, incorpora actividades de comercio y servicios que enriquecen el tejido funcional.
El proceso se realiza sin planificación general (y por supuesto fuera del marco legal): es la suma de acciones individuales que se reconstruyen como una “tendencia” o “patrón emergente”, revitalizando el tejido urbano de forma sutil pero definitiva.
Se planteó como hipótesis que la microdensificación emergente es un proceso de revitalización que aprovecha el potencial del tejido de estos barrios de forma más sostenible y eficiente que el modelo impuesto formalmente.
10
La tesis se encuadró bajo el enfoque sistémico de la complejidad. Este enfoque entiende a la ciudad como un sistema complejo y dinámico, en desarrollo constante; determinado más por las interrelaciones entre sus componentes y entre esos componentes y el contexto, que por las condiciones de cada elemento individualmente. La calidad y cantidad de estas interacciones es primordial, al punto de definir la condición urbana de una aglomeración. Según estas premisas, un sistema urbano sostenible y eficiente será aquel que, maximizando recursos materiales y humanos (y de acuerdo a la capacidad de carga del sistema) desarrolle de redes de intercambio múltiples, diversas y descentralizadas, que generen procesos de sinergia y desarrollo inclusivos.
La investigación se estructuró entonces de forma tal de responder las siguientes preguntas:
•
En primer lugar, ¿cuáles son las condiciones específicas que catalizan la microdensificación en los barrios pericentrales de Córdoba?
•
Siendo la microdensificación una respuesta a una situación particular dentro del sistema urbano, ¿Cuál es el grado de sostenibilidad y eficiencia que aporta a los barrios pericentrales (en particular) y a Córdoba (en general)?
•
Y tras haber identificado su impacto en la estructura urbana, su potencial transformador y organizativo, ¿puede el estudio de los procesos emergentes hacer un aporte conceptual e instrumental a los modelos locales de planeamiento urbano?
Primeramente, un análisis documental reconstruyó la condición específica de los barrios pericentrales, y el escenario actual de Córdoba con respecto a la producción y acceso al hábitat urbano. Luego se infirió un escenario tendencial a corto y mediano plazo, que sirvió para definir distintos patrones de territorialización, incluyendo el patrón “formal” de los barrios pericentrales. Se continuó con el análisis específico de la microdensificación, proponiendo un escenario posible a mediano plazo donde el patrón de microdensificación ha sido plenamente desarrollado, transformando cuali y cuantitativamente el tejido espacio-funcional y socioeconómico.
A partir de estos resultados, se realizó un análisis comparativo de los distintos patrones de desarrollo urbano de Córdoba en cuanto a su sostenibilidad y eficiencia. Se demostró que el patrón de microdensificación en los barrios pericentrales es mucho más sostenible y eficiente que los patrones formales existentes, y se abrió la discusión que se desarrolla en la última parte de esta tesis:
El argumento desarrollado en esta investigación y los resultados que de él se desprenden tienen un carácter analítico y explicativo útil para el análisis de otros escenarios en el contexto urbano argentino y latinoamericano. En primer lugar, sobre preferir la revitalización progresiva frente a la renovación total o la creación de nuevo suelo urbano en la periferia; promover una ciudad compacta, diversa e inclusiva tanto social como funcionalmente; basada en la multiplicación y diversificación de los agentes productores de ciudad; que considera estos procesos, así como los mecanismos de empoderamiento, participación y gobernanza como instrumentos para lograr mayor sostenibilidad y eficiencia en el desarrollo urbano. Por otro lado, esta tesis puso en relevancia el rol de los procesos emergentes en un sistema urbano como mecanismo vital para generar esta revitalización. Finalmente, se discute el aporte del enfoque sistémico para comprender, explicar y proponer intervenciones a la disciplina.
La ri-fondazione della Libia balbiana (1933-1939). Il poderoso racconto fotografico dei “Ventimila”
(2014)
La prima edizione di questo testo è apparsa negli atti del VI Convegno Internazionale di Studi del CIRICE – Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca sull’Iconografia della Città Europea − Università di Napoli Federico II, (Napoli, 13-15 marzo 2014), dal titolo: Città mediterranee in trasformazione. Identità e immagine del paesaggio urbano tra Sette e Novecento, a cura di A. Buccaro e C. de Seta (Collana: Polis, 6; Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2014; pp. 1216; ISBN 9788849528145), all’interno della sessione 7, Le trasformazioni del paesaggio urbano nella fotografia e nella cinematografia, coordinatori: F. Capano, M. Iuliano, pp. 1085-1098. Il Convegno, aperto a studiosi di ambito nazionale e internazionale, si poneva l’obiettivo di fare il punto sulla storiografia riguardante la città mediterranea in età contemporanea, con particolare riferimento alla sua identità, struttura e immagine, dall’inizio dell’industrializzazione all’età post-illuminista e borghese, fino ai temi inerenti l’evoluzione/involuzione del territorio e del paesaggio post-industriale, nonché lo sviluppo del modello turistico tra Otto e Novecento.
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
Living heritage sites are strongly connected to their historical, geographical, socio-political and cultural context. A descriptive narrative of the evolutionary process of the living heritage site of a Sufi shrine is undertaken in this research. It focuses on the changing relationship between the spatial and socio-cultural aspects over time. The larger or macro regional context is interrelated to the micro architectural context. The tangible heritage is defined by and intimately tied to the intangible aspects of the heritage. It is these constituting macro and micro elements and their interrelationships particularly through space and architecture that the research thesis explores in its documentation and analysis.
The Sufi shrine in the South Asian Pakistani context is representative of a larger culture in the precolonial era. It is an expression of an indigenous modernity, belonging to a certain time period, place and community. The Sufi shrine as a building type has evolved from the precolonial time period, particularly starting at the golden ages of the Muslim Empire in the world (9th – 12th century), through the colonial age when western modernity arrived until the current neoliberal paradigm within the post independence period. Continued and evolved use of space, ritualistic performances, multiple social groups using the site are various elements whose documentation and analysis can establish the essential co-relations that contribute to continuity of its historical living. Physical and social relation of the historic site to its immediate settlement context is also a significant element that preserves the socio-cultural context.
The chosen case of the Shrine of Shah Abdul Latif Bhitai, situated in the small town of Bhitshah in the province of Sindh, Pakistan forms a unique example where the particular physical and socio-cultural environment forms the context within which the Sufi heritage lives and survives. It is well integrated within its context at multiple levels. What are these levels and how do the constituting elements integrate is a major subject of research? These form the background to defining some of the basic issues and questions addressed in this doctoral thesis.
Given that living heritage sites are unique due to their particular association to the context, the case study method was used to gain deeper insight and understanding on the topic.
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
Restelo Neighbourhood: Expanding the Capital of the Empire with the First Portuguese Urban Planner
(2015)
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
Spazio sacro e fondazione della comunità. Il tragico òikos dei villaggi di fondazione del fascismo
(2007)
La prima edizione di questo testo è apparsa − in una versione più ridotta −, nel volume: Pasquale Culotta, Giuliano Gresleri, Glauco Gresleri (a cura di), Città di fondazione e “Plantatio Ecclesiae”, Compositori, Bologna 2007, pp. 214-236. Un nutrito pool nazionale, specializzato sulle “Città di fondazione”, in Italia e nelle sue ex-colonie, si è misurato sul tema con una complessa storiografia interdisciplinare, che poneva al centro della sua diagnosi una connotazione teologico-ecumenica – la Plantatio Ecclesiae, appunto – della fenomenologia urbana della fundatio.
Urban design played a central role for the European dictatorships during the 20th century, it served to legitimate the regime, to produce agreement, to demonstrate power, efficiency and speed, it communicated the social, as well as design projects, of the dictatorial regimes domestically and internationally, it tied old experts, as well as new, to the regime. Dictatorial urban design also played an important role after the fall of the dictatorships: It became the object of structural and verbal handling strategies: of demolition, of transformation, of reconstruction, of forgetting, of suppressing, of re-interpretation and of glorification. The topic area is, therefore, both historical and relevant to the present day. The discussion of the topic area is, like it or not, always embedded in the present state of societal engagement with dictatorships.
In order to even be able to discuss all of these aspects, different conceptual decisions are necessary. In retrospect, these may seem to many as self-evident, although they are anything but. Our thesis is that there are three methodological imperatives, especially, which allow an expanded approach to the topic area “urban design and dictatorship”. First and above all, the tunnel view, focused on individual dictatorships and neglecting the international dimension, must be overcome. Second, the differences in urban design over the course of a dictatorship, through an appropriate periodisation, should be emphasised. Third, we must strive for an open, flexible, but complex concept of urban design. The main focus lies on the urban design of the most influential dictatorships of the first half of the 20th century: Soviet Union, Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, including the urban design of the autarky periods in Portugal and Spain.
After all, urban design is not just a product of specific historic circumstances. It is a form that continues to have long-term effects, which demonstrates its usefulness and adaptability throughout this process. The urban design products undoubtedly still recall the dictatorial rule under which they were created. However, they are more than a memory space. They are also a living space of the present. They can and should be discussed with respect to their spatial and functional utility for today and tomorrow. Such a perspective is a given for the citizens of a city, but also for city marketing, having marvellous consequences. Only when we do not exclude this dimension a priori, even in academic discussions, can we do justice to the products of dictatorships.
And finally, the view of the urban design of dictatorships can and must contribute to the questioning of simplified and naive conceptions of dictatorships. With urban design in mind, we can observe how dictatorships work and how they were able to prevail. In Europe, these questions are of the highest actuality.