Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (41) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (18)
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
- Report (3)
- Habilitation (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Review (1)
Institute
- Professur Theorie und Geschichte der modernen Architektur (18)
- Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und Planung (11)
- Junior-Professur Computational Architecture (5)
- Institut für Europäische Urbanistik (3)
- Professur Denkmalpflege und Baugeschichte (1)
- Professur Entwerfen und Städtebau I (1)
- Professur Informatik in der Architektur (1)
- Professur Raumplanung und Raumforschung (1)
- Professur Sozialwissenschaftliche Stadtforschung (1)
- Professur Soziologie und Sozialgeschichte der Stadt (1)
Keywords
- Städtebau (41) (remove)
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
Granite on the Ground: Former Nazi Party Rally Grounds, Nuremberg/Germany. A brief introduction
(2015)
For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results.
Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened
to include those of general historical studies.
With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics.
The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).
La prima edizione di questo testo è apparsa, in tedesco, nel volume II.2.: Anthologie zum Städtebau. Das Phänomen Großstadt und die Entstehung der Stadt der Moderne, a cura di Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani, Katia Frey, Eliana Perotti, con il sostegno di Departement Architektur der Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule, Zürich (Gebr. Mann Verlag, Berlin 2014, pp. 1307-1390). Previ specifici accordi con l’editore, viene qui presentata la versione originaria, in italiano, dell’intero capitolo: Modernität und Emphase. Städtebau im italienischen Faschismus, e comprendente: i) una capiente saggio introduttivo – in una versione più ampia ed articolata (comprensiva della “Bibliografia sistematica”, di riferimento) del testo in tedesco; ii) la versione in italiano del repertorio antologico di riferimento – e comprensiva di una “Scheda introduttiva”, sull’Autore-Opera, e di una selezione del testo in esame.
La ri-fondazione della Libia balbiana (1933-1939). Il poderoso racconto fotografico dei “Ventimila”
(2014)
La prima edizione di questo testo è apparsa negli atti del VI Convegno Internazionale di Studi del CIRICE – Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca sull’Iconografia della Città Europea − Università di Napoli Federico II, (Napoli, 13-15 marzo 2014), dal titolo: Città mediterranee in trasformazione. Identità e immagine del paesaggio urbano tra Sette e Novecento, a cura di A. Buccaro e C. de Seta (Collana: Polis, 6; Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2014; pp. 1216; ISBN 9788849528145), all’interno della sessione 7, Le trasformazioni del paesaggio urbano nella fotografia e nella cinematografia, coordinatori: F. Capano, M. Iuliano, pp. 1085-1098. Il Convegno, aperto a studiosi di ambito nazionale e internazionale, si poneva l’obiettivo di fare il punto sulla storiografia riguardante la città mediterranea in età contemporanea, con particolare riferimento alla sua identità, struttura e immagine, dall’inizio dell’industrializzazione all’età post-illuminista e borghese, fino ai temi inerenti l’evoluzione/involuzione del territorio e del paesaggio post-industriale, nonché lo sviluppo del modello turistico tra Otto e Novecento.
Ausgangspunkt der Arbeit ist der Aspekt des Unheimlichen in jener Hochhausstadt, deren Entwurf Ludwig Hilberseimer 1924 zum ersten Mal publizierte und die später zum Synonym für die Aberrationen modernistischen Städtebaus wurde. Daraus geht die Forschungsfrage hervor, wie der Eindruck des Unheimlichen evoziert wird und an welchen Elementen des Entwurfs und/oder der Darstellung dieser festgemacht werden kann. Hier geht es nicht um eine Analyse der Intentionen des Autors der Hochhausstadt, der diese ja als Verbesserung zu den herrschenden Wohnverhältnissen anpries; stattdessen wird eine Reihe von unterschiedlichen interpretatorischen Ansätzen gewählt (von Nelson Goodmans Theorie der Notation über Norman Brysons visuelles Zeichensystem bis hin zu Adornos Negativer Dialektik; von der „Bildwissenschaft“ bis hin zur „visual theory“). In diesem Zusammenhang werden schließlich auch jene Divergenzen herausgearbeitet, die zwischen der Architektur der Moderne und der Kunst der Avantgarde herrschten. Da aufgrund der Frage nach der Bildwirkung der beiden Perspektiven der Hochhausstadt die Ästhetik des Erhabenen eine besondere Rolle spielt, reicht der Fokus der Arbeit bis in den kunst- und architekturtheoretischen Diskurs des 18. Jahrhundert zurück. Zuletzt mündet die Arbeit in eine Diskussion von Interpretation selbst und der Möglichkeit einer kritischen Architekturtheorie.
Based on the description of a conceptual framework for the representation of planning problems on various scales, we introduce an evolutionary design optimization system. This system is exemplified by means of the generation of street networks with locally defined properties for centrality. We show three different scenarios for planning requirements and evaluate the resulting structures with respect to the requirements of our framework. Finally the potentials and challenges of the presented approach are discussed in detail.