Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (9)
- Book (3)
- Periodical (3)
- Article (2)
- Other (1)
Institute
- DFG-Graduiertenkolleg 2227 "Identität und Erbe" (3)
- Professur Denkmalpflege und Baugeschichte (3)
- Hochschule für Musik FRANZ LISZT (2)
- Institut für Europäische Urbanistik (2)
- Professur Raumplanung und Raumforschung (2)
- Professur Sozialwissenschaftliche Stadtforschung (2)
- Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und Planung (1)
- Professur Interface Design (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek (1)
- Zentrale Einrichtungen, Büro des Präsidenten, Dezernate (1)
Keywords
- Kulturerbe (18) (remove)
Music as living heritage
(2018)
What is cultural heritage, and why has it received so much public interest in recent years? Almost three decades after the World Organization UNESCO defined and established international recognition of Cultural and Natural Heritage sites and devised ways of protecting them, a completely new approach to cultural heritage emerged with the UNESCO
Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage in 2003. This global agreement for the maintenance, protection and dissemination of cultural manifestations and achievements that are not tangible objects or immobile monuments, like previous items classified as World Heritage, was a remarkable milestone of international cultural politics. This new understanding of cultural heritage owes much to representatives from Asian, African, and Latin American countries. In fact, just a few years after the promulgation of the 2003 Convention, the world cultural heritage map had already lost much of its European predominance. Asian countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, and India very soon showed up with lists of manifestations of their centenary (in some cases even millenary) national cultural heritages.
Living heritage sites are strongly connected to their historical, geographical, socio-political and cultural context. A descriptive narrative of the evolutionary process of the living heritage site of a Sufi shrine is undertaken in this research. It focuses on the changing relationship between the spatial and socio-cultural aspects over time. The larger or macro regional context is interrelated to the micro architectural context. The tangible heritage is defined by and intimately tied to the intangible aspects of the heritage. It is these constituting macro and micro elements and their interrelationships particularly through space and architecture that the research thesis explores in its documentation and analysis.
The Sufi shrine in the South Asian Pakistani context is representative of a larger culture in the precolonial era. It is an expression of an indigenous modernity, belonging to a certain time period, place and community. The Sufi shrine as a building type has evolved from the precolonial time period, particularly starting at the golden ages of the Muslim Empire in the world (9th – 12th century), through the colonial age when western modernity arrived until the current neoliberal paradigm within the post independence period. Continued and evolved use of space, ritualistic performances, multiple social groups using the site are various elements whose documentation and analysis can establish the essential co-relations that contribute to continuity of its historical living. Physical and social relation of the historic site to its immediate settlement context is also a significant element that preserves the socio-cultural context.
The chosen case of the Shrine of Shah Abdul Latif Bhitai, situated in the small town of Bhitshah in the province of Sindh, Pakistan forms a unique example where the particular physical and socio-cultural environment forms the context within which the Sufi heritage lives and survives. It is well integrated within its context at multiple levels. What are these levels and how do the constituting elements integrate is a major subject of research? These form the background to defining some of the basic issues and questions addressed in this doctoral thesis.
Given that living heritage sites are unique due to their particular association to the context, the case study method was used to gain deeper insight and understanding on the topic.
Since the end of the 1950s, Italy has focused part of its modernization on the erection of public works. Due to corruption, mafia, and further malpractice, this form of development has occasionally failed, producing a high number of constructions that have remained unfinished for decades. In 2007, the group of artists Alterazioni Video constructed an informal survey in the form of an on-line tool open to public contributions, which revealed that there are 395 unfinished public works in Italy from which 156, approximately 39.5%, are located in Sicily alone. In view of such a statistic, Alterazioni Video opted to coin the term ‘Incompiuto Siciliano’ – literally ‘Sicilian Incompletion’ – to refer to unfinished public works as a formal architectural style. This re-interpretation, which aims to convey the recovered dignity of these ‘modern ruins’, considers unfinished public works a type of heritage with the potential to represent the entirety of Italian society. Furthermore, it goes as far as to say an unfinished public work is ‘Incompiuto Siciliano’ despite being located in another of the Italian regions.
This doctoral dissertation embraces the artists’ argument to develop a complete study of Incompiuto Siciliano by embedding this architectural style/artistic project within the main debates on modern ruins at present. This is important because it is expected to contribute to the revalorization and eventual recommissioning of unfinished sites by validating Incompiuto Siciliano in the realm of academia. Furthermore, this work aspires to be a worthwhile source of information for future investigations dealing with cultural interpretations of incompletion in any other context – a not unreasonable goal considering how unfinished works are one of the key urban topics after the 2008 financial crisis. Hence, this doctoral dissertation uses Incompiuto Siciliano to discuss a different perspective in each of the five chapters and, though these can be read as independent contributions, the objective is that all chapters read together, form a clear, concise, continuous unit. And so it must be said this is not a dissertation about unfinished public works in Italy; this is a dissertation about Incompiuto Siciliano as an artistic response to unfinished public works in Italy – which clearly requires an interdisciplinary analysis involving Urban Studies, Cultural Geography, Contemporary Archaeology, Critical Heritage and Visual Arts.
Alles Heritage?
(2016)
Die Erweiterung des Denkmalbegriffs hat zu einer Expansion des Erinnerns, Schützens, Bewahrens und Tradierens auf alle Bereiche des Lebens geführt. Heute werden nicht nur Scheunen, Tankstellen und Großwohnsiedlungen als Teil des historischen Erbes unter Denkmalschutz gestellt, sondern auch kulturelle Praktiken und Bräuche zum „immateriellen“ Weltkulturerbe erklärt. Die Folge dieser als „Denkmal-Inflation“ kritisierten Entwicklung ist eine verschärfte Konkurrenz um Aufmerksamkeit und finanzielle Zuwendungen. Letzteres spiegelt sich nicht zuletzt in einer zunehmenden, maßgeblich von der Tourismusindustrie geförderten publikumswirksamen Inszenierung des Erbes.
Im Zeitalter der „Heritage Industry“ (Robert Hewison, 1987) bilden Kulturgüter aber nicht nur einen wichtigen Standortfaktor, sondern wird das „Erbe“ selbst zunehmend mittels internationaler Charten, Deklarationen, Plaketten und Social Media-Kampagnen konstruiert. Dies geschieht vorwiegend innerhalb eines anglophonen Diskurses, der aber an die deutschsprachigen begriffs- und ideengeschichtlich geprägten Diskussionen strenggenommen nicht anschlussfähig ist. Dort lässt sich ein – in einem ähnlichen Sinne umfassend zu nennender – Erbe-Begriff zwar bereits für die Heimatschutzbewegung konstatieren, eine fachlich ausdifferenzierte Denkmalpflege, wie wir sie heute
kennen, tut sich jedoch schwer, ein solches universelles Konzept zu integrieren. Während die „Heritagisierung“ durch internationale Organisationen zu einer Verschiebung des Fokus von Baudenkmalen hin zur allgemeinen Bewahrung von Kulturerbe führt (das immaterielle eingeschlossen, siehe etwa die Burra Charter), bleibt der Denkmal- und Erbe-Diskurs in den deutschsprachigen Ländern bislang klar auf Baudenkmale und städtebauliche Ensembles konzentriert. Letzteres zeigt sich auch im Vorfeld des European Cultural Heritage Year 2018, das in Deutschland im Gegensatz zu anderen europäischen Ländern maßgeblich von Denkmalschutzorganisationen getragen wird.
Die Wende hin zum Heritage lässt sich gleichermaßen bei neuen Forschungsfeldern und Ausbildungswegen der Denkmalpflege beobachten. So werden heute „Heritage Tourism“ und „Dark Heritage“ als spezifische Formen der „Denkmalnutzung“ untersucht und bilden – in Ergänzung zu den klassischen Disziplinen Kunstgeschichte, Architektur und Planung – „Heritage Management“ und „Heritage Studies“ grundständige Studiengänge. Letzteres gilt inzwischen auch für die deutschsprachigen Länder. Der Weg führt damit weg von der spezialisierten Kennerschaft zum Allrounder mit neuen Schwerpunkten auf Marketing, Verwaltung und Vermittlung. Mit Blick auf sozio-kulturelle Entwicklungen erweist sich, dass der Heritage-Begriff vor allem im ökonomischen und politischen Diskurs weitgehend affirmativ gebraucht wird. Heritage geht demnach mit einem gewissen moralischen wie missionarischen Impetus einher, verbunden mit einer (Kultur-)Politik der „Identitätsstiftung“. In Zeiten, in denen „Identität“ wieder als politisches Schlagwort im gesellschaftlichen Diskurs fungiert, scheint es um so wichtiger, die wissenschaftliche Beschäftigung mit Heritage, die zugrunde liegenden begrifflichen Konzepte und präskriptiven Programme, kritisch zu reflektieren.
The conservation of living heritage sites is a highly complex process. Two factors need careful consideration in order to achieve a balance in the management of such sites: the conservation demands of conservation experts for built heritage and the needs of local people for development of their heritage living space. The complexity of factors involved make for an interesting study of living heritage, taken up by this research in its main case study of the town of Nan in Thailand.
Research into the historical background of Nan and its cultural heritage reveals a living heritage site, which is both unique and diverse. Present day Nan was examined using a variety of analysis tools, which were applied to data from interviews, empirical data, field surveys, and documents, in order to better understand the nature of the living heritage site and changing trends over time. Luang Prabang in Lao PDR, a World Heritage site since 1995, was also selected as a further case study with which to compare Nan’s potential World Heritage status from a point of view of changes to living heritage attributes.
The outcomes of the research indicate the importance of the management of the sites, which can be at risk of losing balance by focusing on one aspect of heritage to the detriment of the other. The conservation perspective, if allowed to dominate, as in Luang Prabang, can cause irreparable damage to the social fabric, where the development needs of the town are not met. This research concludes that a balance of power amongst stakeholders in the collaborative networks managing such sites is vital to sustaining a balance of living heritage attributes.
In a historical perspective, the relationship between digital media and the museum environment is marked by the role of museums as example use cases for the appli- cation of digital media. Today, this exceptional use as an often technology oriented application has changed and instead digital media have turned into an integral part of mediation strategies in the museum environment. Alongside with this shift not only an increasing professionalization of application development but also a grow- ing demand for new content can be observed. Comparable to its role as the main cost factor in the media industry, the production of content rises to a challenge for museums. In particular small and medium scale european museums with limited funding and an often low level of staff coverage face this new demand and strive therefore for alternative production resources. While productive user contributions can be seen as such an alternative resource, user contributions are at the same time a manifestation for a different mode of in- teracting with content. In contrast to the dominantly passive role of audiences as re- ceivers of information, productive contributions emerge as a mode of content ex- ploration and become in this regard influential for museum mediation strategies. As applications of user contributions in museums and cultural heritage are currently rather seldom, a broader perspective towards user contributions becomes necessary to understand its specific challenges, opportunities and limitations. Productive user contributions can be found in a growing number of applications on the Internet where they either complement or fully substitute corporate content production processes. While the Wikipedia1, an online encyclopedia written entirely by a group of users and open to contributions by all its users, is one of the most prominent examples for this practice, several more applications emerged or are be- ing developed. In consequence user contributions are about to become a powerful source for the production of content in digital media environments.
Die elektronische Virtualisierung von Baudenkmalen ist neues, außergewöhnlich vielfältiges medientechnisches Phänomen; es beschreibt die ursprüngliche Form substanziell-realer Baudenkmale, transformiert sie von einer abstrakten Beschreibung in Wort und Bild in eine immaterielle Realität. Die Dissertation versucht Antworten zu geben auf folgende Fragen: Ist die elektronische Virtualisierung eine Methode der Stimulation der Öffentlichkeit im Umgang mit Baudenkmalen? Ist das elektronisch virtualisierte Baudenkmal ein immaterielles Zeugnis der Kulturgeschichte in der Zukunft? Ist das substanziell-reale und das virtualisierte Baudenkmal uneingeschränkt gegenseitig austauschbar, ist ersteres durch letzteres ersetzbar? Die Beantwortung der Fragen hängt ab von den Stufen der Perfektion der elektronischen Virtualsierung von Baudenkmalen.