Refine
Document Type
- Article (59) (remove)
Institute
- Institut für Strukturmechanik (ISM) (55)
- Professur Stochastik und Optimierung (40)
- Bauhaus-Institut für zukunftsweisende Infrastruktursysteme (b.is) (2)
- Graduiertenkolleg 1462 (1)
- Materialforschungs- und -prüfanstalt an der Bauhaus-Universität (1)
- Professur Modellierung und Simulation - Konstruktion (1)
Keywords
- Stochastik (41)
- Strukturmechanik (41)
- Angewandte Mathematik (40)
- Maschinelles Lernen (6)
- Erdbeben (5)
- OA-Publikationsfonds2020 (5)
- rapid visual screening (4)
- Machine learning (3)
- OA-Publikationsfonds2022 (3)
- damaged buildings (3)
- earthquake safety assessment (3)
- Fahrleitung (2)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (2)
- OA-Publikationsfonds2021 (2)
- Schaden (2)
- Vulnerability assessment (2)
- buildings (2)
- soft computing techniques (2)
- vulnerability assessment (2)
- 3D reinforced concrete buildings (1)
- Arc-direct energy deposition (1)
- Baustahl (1)
- Bayesian inference (1)
- Beam-to-column connection; semi-rigid; flush end-plate connection; moment-rotation curve (1)
- Bodenmechanik (1)
- Building safety assessment (1)
- Catenary poles (1)
- Computational modeling (1)
- Damm (1)
- Defekt (1)
- Dielectric materials (1)
- Dreidimensionales Modell (1)
- Dual phase steel (1)
- Earthquake (1)
- Elektrostatische Welle (1)
- Empire XPU 8.01 (1)
- Erdbebensicherheit (1)
- Fahrleitungsmast (1)
- Finite element methods (1)
- Fire resistance; Parameter optimization; Sensitivity analysis; Thermal properties (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Fuzzy Logic (1)
- Fuzzy-Logik (1)
- High-speed electric train (1)
- Impedance measurement (1)
- MATLAB (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Manufacturing (1)
- Materialverhalten (1)
- Matlab (1)
- Mild steel (1)
- Model-free status monitoring (1)
- Multi-criteria decision making (1)
- Neuronales Netz (1)
- OA-Publikationsfonds2023 (1)
- Optimierung (1)
- Partial differential equations (1)
- Piezoelectric materials (1)
- Polymorphie (1)
- Rapid Visual Screening (1)
- Resonance (1)
- Resonanz (1)
- Rotorblatt (1)
- SHM (1)
- Schadenserkennung (1)
- Sensitivitätsanalyse (1)
- Sigmoid function (1)
- Spannungs-Dehnungs-Beziehung (1)
- Stahlbetonkonstruktion (1)
- Stoffeigenschaft (1)
- Stress-strain curve (1)
- Strukturanalyse (1)
- Stütze (1)
- TPOGS (1)
- Thermodynamische Eigenschaft (1)
- Tragfähigkeit (1)
- Träger (1)
- Vulnerability (1)
- Windkraftwerk (1)
- artificial neural network (1)
- artificial neural networks (1)
- crack detection (1)
- damage identification (1)
- dams (1)
- earthquake (1)
- earthquake damage (1)
- earthquake vulnerability assessment (1)
- electromagnetic waves (1)
- experimental validation (1)
- extreme events (1)
- fisher-information matrix (1)
- full-waveform inversion (1)
- ground structure (1)
- hybride Werkstoffe (1)
- inverse analysis (1)
- machine learning (1)
- mean-squared error (1)
- mitigation (1)
- natural hazard (1)
- polymorphe Unschärfemodellierung (1)
- rapid assessment (1)
- rapid classification (1)
- seismic assessment (1)
- seismic risk estimation (1)
- seismic vulnerability (1)
- supervised learning (1)
- support vector machine (1)
- topology optimization (1)
- tower-like structures (1)
- vibration-based damage identification (1)
- wave propagation (1)
- wind turbine rotor blades (1)
Recently, the demand for residence and usage of urban infrastructure has been increased, thereby resulting in the elevation of risk levels of human lives over natural calamities. The occupancy demand has rapidly increased the construction rate, whereas the inadequate design of structures prone to more vulnerability. Buildings constructed before the development of seismic codes have an additional susceptibility to earthquake vibrations. The structural collapse causes an economic loss as well as setbacks for human lives. An application of different theoretical methods to analyze the structural behavior is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, introducing a rapid vulnerability assessment method to check structural performances is necessary for future developments. The process, as mentioned earlier, is known as Rapid Visual Screening (RVS). This technique has been generated to identify, inventory, and screen structures that are potentially hazardous. Sometimes, poor construction quality does not provide some of the required parameters; in this case, the RVS process turns into a tedious scenario. Hence, to tackle such a situation, multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for the seismic vulnerability assessment opens a new gateway. The different parameters required by RVS can be taken in MCDM. MCDM evaluates multiple conflicting criteria in decision making in several fields. This paper has aimed to bridge the gap between RVS and MCDM. Furthermore, to define the correlation between these techniques, implementation of the methodologies from Indian, Turkish, and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) codes has been done. The effects of seismic vulnerability of structures have been observed and compared.