Refine
Document Type
- Article (51)
- Doctoral Thesis (18)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Master's Thesis (4)
- Periodical (2)
- Report (2)
- Book (1)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Habilitation (1)
- Study Thesis (1)
Institute
- Institut für Strukturmechanik (ISM) (42)
- Junior-Professur Computational Architecture (6)
- Professur Stochastik und Optimierung (4)
- Graduiertenkolleg 1462 (3)
- In Zusammenarbeit mit der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (3)
- Institut für Europäische Urbanistik (3)
- Professur Baubetrieb und Bauverfahren (3)
- Professur Bauchemie und Polymere Werkstoffe (3)
- An-Institute (2)
- Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und Planung (2)
- F. A. Finger-Institut für Baustoffkunde (FIB) (2)
- Juniorprofessur Simulation und Experiment (2)
- Professur Geschichte und Theorie der Kulturtechniken (2)
- Promotionsstudiengang Kunst und Design-Freie Kunst-Medienkunst (Ph.D) (2)
- Materialforschungs- und -prüfanstalt an der Bauhaus-Universität (1)
- Professur Bauphysik (1)
- Professur Baustatik und Bauteilfestigkeit (1)
- Professur Denkmalpflege und Baugeschichte (1)
- Professur Informatik in der Architektur (1)
- Professur Interface Design (1)
- Professur Massivbau II (1)
- Professur Modellierung und Simulation - Konstruktion (1)
- Professur Siedlungswasserwirtschaft (1)
- Professur Sozialwissenschaftliche Stadtforschung (1)
- Professur Stahlbau (1)
- Professur Theorie und Geschichte der modernen Architektur (1)
Keywords
- Strukturmechanik (37)
- Angewandte Mathematik (36)
- Städtebau (6)
- Stochastik (4)
- Modellierung (3)
- Architektur (2)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (2)
- Informatik (2)
- Kulturwissenschaft (2)
- Medienwissenschaft (2)
Year of publication
- 2014 (85) (remove)
We present and compare two evolutionary algorithm based methods for rectangular architectural layout generation: dense packing and subdivision algorithms.We analyze the characteristics of the two methods on the basis of three floor plan sce- narios. Our analyses include the speed with which solutions are generated, the reliability with which optimal solutions can be found, and the number of different solutions that can be found overall. In a following step, we discuss the methods with respect to their different user interaction capabilities. In addition, we show that each method has the capability to generate more complex L-shaped layouts. Finally,we conclude that neither of the methods is superior but that each of them is suitable for use in distinct application scenarios because of its different properties.