• search hit 67 of 100
Back to Result List

Aesthetics of Maker Culture: the Active Role of the Audience

  • In this work, practice-based research is conducted to rethink the understanding of aesthetics, especially in relation to current media art. Granted, we live in times when technologies merge with living organisms, but we also live in times that provide unlimited resources of knowledge and maker tools. I raise the question: In what way does the hybridization of living organisms and non-livingIn this work, practice-based research is conducted to rethink the understanding of aesthetics, especially in relation to current media art. Granted, we live in times when technologies merge with living organisms, but we also live in times that provide unlimited resources of knowledge and maker tools. I raise the question: In what way does the hybridization of living organisms and non-living technologies affect art audiences in the culture that may be defined as Maker culture? My hypothesis is that active participation of an audience in an artwork is inevitable for experiencing the artwork itself, while also suggesting that the impact of the umwelt changes the perception of an artwork. I emphasize artistic projects that unfold through mutual interaction among diverse peers, including humans, non-human organisms, and machines. In my thesis, I pursue collaborative scenarios that lead to the realization of artistic ideas: (1) the development of ideas by others influenced by me and (2) the materialization of my own ideas influenced by others. By developing the scenarios of collaborative work as an artistic experience, I conclude that the role of an artist in Maker culture is to mediate different types of knowledge and different positions, whereas the role of the audience is to actively engage in the artwork itself. At the same time, aesthetics as experience is triggered by the other, including living and non-living actors. It is intended that the developed methodologies could be further adapted in artistic practices, philosophy, anthropology, and environmental studies.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Metadaten
Document Type:Doctoral Thesis
Author: Mindaugas GapševičiusORCiDGND
DOI (Cite-Link):https://doi.org/10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4939Cite-Link
URN (Cite-Link):https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230313-49396Cite-Link
Referee:Prof. Dr. Kristupas Sabolius, Prof. Dr. Rasa Smite
Advisor:Prof. Ursula DammORCiDGND, Prof. Dr. phil. habil. Henning SchmidgenORCiDGND
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2023/03/10
Date of first Publication:2023/03/10
Date of final exam:2022/09/26
Release Date:2023/03/13
Publishing Institution:Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
Granting Institution:Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Fakultät Kunst und Gestaltung
Institutes and partner institutions:Fakultät Kunst und Gestaltung / Medienkunst/Mediengestaltung
Pagenumber:206
Tag:BioArt; Maker Culture; Media art
GND Keyword:Medienkunst; BioArt
Dewey Decimal Classification:700 Künste und Unterhaltung / 770 Fotografie, Computerkunst / 770 Fotografie, Fotografien, Computerkunst
BKL-Classification:21 Einzelne Kunstformen / 21.98 Mediale Kunst
Licence (German):License Logo Creative Commons 4.0 - Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen (CC BY-SA 4.0)