TY - JOUR A1 - Mosavi, Amir A1 - Shamshirband, Shahaboddin A1 - Esmaeilbeiki, Fatemeh A1 - Zarehaghi, Davoud A1 - Neyshabouri, Mohammadreza A1 - Samadianfard, Saeed A1 - Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali A1 - Nabipour, Narjes A1 - Chau, Kwok-Wing T1 - Comparative analysis of hybrid models of firefly optimization algorithm with support vector machines and multilayer perceptron for predicting soil temperature at different depths JF - Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics N2 - This research aims to model soil temperature (ST) using machine learning models of multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithm and support vector machine (SVM) in hybrid form with the Firefly optimization algorithm, i.e. MLP-FFA and SVM-FFA. In the current study, measured ST and meteorological parameters of Tabriz and Ahar weather stations in a period of 2013–2015 are used for training and testing of the studied models with one and two days as a delay. To ascertain conclusive results for validation of the proposed hybrid models, the error metrics are benchmarked in an independent testing period. Moreover, Taylor diagrams utilized for that purpose. Obtained results showed that, in a case of one day delay, except in predicting ST at 5 cm below the soil surface (ST5cm) at Tabriz station, MLP-FFA produced superior results compared with MLP, SVM, and SVM-FFA models. However, for two days delay, MLP-FFA indicated increased accuracy in predicting ST5cm and ST 20cm of Tabriz station and ST10cm of Ahar station in comparison with SVM-FFA. Additionally, for all of the prescribed models, the performance of the MLP-FFA and SVM-FFA hybrid models in the testing phase was found to be meaningfully superior to the classical MLP and SVM models. KW - Bodentemperatur KW - Algorithmus KW - Maschinelles Lernen KW - Neuronales Netz KW - firefly optimization algorithm KW - soil temperature KW - artificial neural networks KW - hybrid machine learning KW - OA-Publikationsfonds2019 Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200911-42347 UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19942060.2020.1788644 VL - 2020 IS - Volume 14, Issue 1 SP - 939 EP - 953 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kargar, Katayoun A1 - Samadianfard, Saeed A1 - Parsa, Javad A1 - Nabipour, Narjes A1 - Shamshirband, Shahaboddin A1 - Mosavi, Amir A1 - Chau, Kwok-Wing T1 - Estimating longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using empirical models and machine learning algorithms JF - Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics N2 - The longitudinal dispersion coefficient (LDC) plays an important role in modeling the transport of pollutants and sediment in natural rivers. As a result of transportation processes, the concentration of pollutants changes along the river. Various studies have been conducted to provide simple equations for estimating LDC. In this study, machine learning methods, namely support vector regression, Gaussian process regression, M5 model tree (M5P) and random forest, and multiple linear regression were examined in predicting the LDC in natural streams. Data sets from 60 rivers around the world with different hydraulic and geometric features were gathered to develop models for LDC estimation. Statistical criteria, including correlation coefficient (CC), root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), were used to scrutinize the models. The LDC values estimated by these models were compared with the corresponding results of common empirical models. The Taylor chart was used to evaluate the models and the results showed that among the machine learning models, M5P had superior performance, with CC of 0.823, RMSE of 454.9 and MAE of 380.9. The model of Sahay and Dutta, with CC of 0.795, RMSE of 460.7 and MAE of 306.1, gave more precise results than the other empirical models. The main advantage of M5P models is their ability to provide practical formulae. In conclusion, the results proved that the developed M5P model with simple formulations was superior to other machine learning models and empirical models; therefore, it can be used as a proper tool for estimating the LDC in rivers. KW - Maschinelles Lernen KW - Gaussian process regression KW - longitudinal dispersion coefficient KW - M5 model tree KW - random forest KW - support vector regression KW - rivers Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200128-40775 UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19942060.2020.1712260 VL - 2020 IS - Volume 14, No. 1 SP - 311 EP - 322 PB - Taylor & Francis ER -