TY - JOUR A1 - Harirchian, Ehsan A1 - Kumari, Vandana A1 - Jadhav, Kirti A1 - Raj Das, Rohan A1 - Rasulzade, Shahla A1 - Lahmer, Tom T1 - A Machine Learning Framework for Assessing Seismic Hazard Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings JF - Applied Sciences N2 - Although averting a seismic disturbance and its physical, social, and economic disruption is practically impossible, using the advancements in computational science and numerical modeling shall equip humanity to predict its severity, understand the outcomes, and equip for post-disaster management. Many buildings exist amidst the developed metropolitan areas, which are senile and still in service. These buildings were also designed before establishing national seismic codes or without the introduction of construction regulations. In that case, risk reduction is significant for developing alternatives and designing suitable models to enhance the existing structure’s performance. Such models will be able to classify risks and casualties related to possible earthquakes through emergency preparation. Thus, it is crucial to recognize structures that are susceptible to earthquake vibrations and need to be prioritized for retrofitting. However, each building’s behavior under seismic actions cannot be studied through performing structural analysis, as it might be unrealistic because of the rigorous computations, long period, and substantial expenditure. Therefore, it calls for a simple, reliable, and accurate process known as Rapid Visual Screening (RVS), which serves as a primary screening platform, including an optimum number of seismic parameters and predetermined performance damage conditions for structures. In this study, the damage classification technique was studied, and the efficacy of the Machine Learning (ML) method in damage prediction via a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model was explored. The ML model is trained and tested separately on damage data from four different earthquakes, namely Ecuador, Haiti, Nepal, and South Korea. Each dataset consists of varying numbers of input data and eight performance modifiers. Based on the study and the results, the ML model using SVM classifies the given input data into the belonging classes and accomplishes the performance on hazard safety evaluation of buildings. KW - Erdbeben KW - Vulnerability KW - Earthquake KW - damaged buildings KW - earthquake safety assessment KW - soft computing techniques KW - rapid visual screening KW - Machine Learning KW - vulnerability assessment KW - OA-Publikationsfonds2020 Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201022-42744 UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/20/7153 VL - 2020 IS - Volume 10, issue 20, article 7153 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Harirchian, Ehsan A1 - Jadhav, Kirti A1 - Mohammad, Kifaytullah A1 - Aghakouchaki Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan A1 - Lahmer, Tom T1 - A Comparative Study of MCDM Methods Integrated with Rapid Visual Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing RC Structures JF - Applied Sciences N2 - Recently, the demand for residence and usage of urban infrastructure has been increased, thereby resulting in the elevation of risk levels of human lives over natural calamities. The occupancy demand has rapidly increased the construction rate, whereas the inadequate design of structures prone to more vulnerability. Buildings constructed before the development of seismic codes have an additional susceptibility to earthquake vibrations. The structural collapse causes an economic loss as well as setbacks for human lives. An application of different theoretical methods to analyze the structural behavior is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, introducing a rapid vulnerability assessment method to check structural performances is necessary for future developments. The process, as mentioned earlier, is known as Rapid Visual Screening (RVS). This technique has been generated to identify, inventory, and screen structures that are potentially hazardous. Sometimes, poor construction quality does not provide some of the required parameters; in this case, the RVS process turns into a tedious scenario. Hence, to tackle such a situation, multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for the seismic vulnerability assessment opens a new gateway. The different parameters required by RVS can be taken in MCDM. MCDM evaluates multiple conflicting criteria in decision making in several fields. This paper has aimed to bridge the gap between RVS and MCDM. Furthermore, to define the correlation between these techniques, implementation of the methodologies from Indian, Turkish, and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) codes has been done. The effects of seismic vulnerability of structures have been observed and compared. KW - Erdbebensicherheit KW - damaged buildings KW - earthquake safety assessment KW - soft computing techniques KW - rapid visual screening KW - seismic risk estimation KW - Multi-criteria decision making KW - vulnerability assessment KW - OA-Publikationsfonds2020 Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200918-42360 UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/18/6411/htm VL - 2020 IS - Volume 10, issue 18, article 6411 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Harirchian, Ehsan A1 - Lahmer, Tom A1 - Kumari, Vandana A1 - Jadhav, Kirti T1 - Application of Support Vector Machine Modeling for the Rapid Seismic Hazard Safety Evaluation of Existing Buildings JF - Energies N2 - The economic losses from earthquakes tend to hit the national economy considerably; therefore, models that are capable of estimating the vulnerability and losses of future earthquakes are highly consequential for emergency planners with the purpose of risk mitigation. This demands a mass prioritization filtering of structures to identify vulnerable buildings for retrofitting purposes. The application of advanced structural analysis on each building to study the earthquake response is impractical due to complex calculations, long computational time, and exorbitant cost. This exhibits the need for a fast, reliable, and rapid method, commonly known as Rapid Visual Screening (RVS). The method serves as a preliminary screening platform, using an optimum number of seismic parameters of the structure and predefined output damage states. In this study, the efficacy of the Machine Learning (ML) application in damage prediction through a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model as the damage classification technique has been investigated. The developed model was trained and examined based on damage data from the 1999 Düzce Earthquake in Turkey, where the building’s data consists of 22 performance modifiers that have been implemented with supervised machine learning. KW - Erdbeben KW - Maschinelles Lernen KW - earthquake vulnerability assessment KW - rapid visual screening KW - machine learning KW - support vector machine KW - buildings KW - OA-Publikationsfonds2020 Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200707-41915 UR - https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3340 VL - 2020 IS - volume 13, issue 13, 3340 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Harirchian, Ehsan A1 - Lahmer, Tom A1 - Buddhiraju, Sreekanth A1 - Mohammad, Kifaytullah A1 - Mosavi, Amir T1 - Earthquake Safety Assessment of Buildings through Rapid Visual Screening JF - Buildings N2 - Earthquake is among the most devastating natural disasters causing severe economical, environmental, and social destruction. Earthquake safety assessment and building hazard monitoring can highly contribute to urban sustainability through identification and insight into optimum materials and structures. While the vulnerability of structures mainly depends on the structural resistance, the safety assessment of buildings can be highly challenging. In this paper, we consider the Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) method, which is a qualitative procedure for estimating structural scores for buildings suitable for medium- to high-seismic cases. This paper presents an overview of the common RVS methods, i.e., FEMA P-154, IITK-GGSDMA, and EMPI. To examine the accuracy and validation, a practical comparison is performed between their assessment and observed damage of reinforced concrete buildings from a street survey in the Bingöl region, Turkey, after the 1 May 2003 earthquake. The results demonstrate that the application of RVS methods for preliminary damage estimation is a vital tool. Furthermore, the comparative analysis showed that FEMA P-154 creates an assessment that overestimates damage states and is not economically viable, while EMPI and IITK-GGSDMA provide more accurate and practical estimation, respectively. KW - Maschinelles Lernen KW - Machine learning KW - Erdbeben KW - buildings KW - earthquake safety assessment KW - earthquake KW - extreme events KW - seismic assessment KW - natural hazard KW - mitigation KW - rapid visual screening Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200331-41153 UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/3/51 VL - 2020 IS - Volume 10, Issue 3 PB - MDPI ER -