TY - JOUR A1 - Alsaad, Hayder A1 - Völker, Conrad T1 - Performance assessment of a ductless personalized ventilation system using a validated CFD model JF - Journal of Building Performance Simulation N2 - The aim of this study is twofold: to validate a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model, and then to use the validated model to evaluate the performance of a ductless personalized ventilation (DPV) system. To validate the numerical model, a series of measurements was conducted in a climate chamber equipped with a thermal manikin. Various turbulence models, settings, and options were tested; simulation results were compared to the measured data to determine the turbulence model and solver settings that achieve the best agreement between the measured and simulated values. Subsequently, the validated CFD model was then used to evaluate the thermal environment and indoor air quality in a room equipped with a DPV system combined with displacement ventilation. Results from the numerical model were then used to quantify thermal sensation and comfort using the UC Berkeley thermal comfort model. KW - Ventilation KW - Validierung KW - Strömungsmechanik KW - Raumklima KW - personalized ventilation KW - validation KW - computational fluid dynamics KW - thermal comfort KW - indoor air quality Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190218-38500 UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19401493.2018.1431806 N1 - Copyright 2018 Taylor & Francis Group and the International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA). This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the authors and Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in the Journal of Building Performance Simulation 11 (6), 689–704 (2018) and may be found at https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2018.1431806 VL - 2018 IS - 11, Heft 6 SP - 689 EP - 704 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Völker, Conrad A1 - Alsaad, Hayder T1 - Simulating the human body's microclimate using automatic coupling of CFD and an advanced thermoregulation model JF - Indoor Air N2 - This study aims to develop an approach to couple a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver to the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) thermal comfort model to accurately evaluate thermal comfort. The coupling was made using an iterative JavaScript to automatically transfer data for each individual segment of the human body back and forth between the CFD solver and the UCB model until reaching convergence defined by a stopping criterion. The location from which data are transferred to the UCB model was determined using a new approach based on the temperature difference between subsequent points on the temperature profile curve in the vicinity of the body surface. This approach was used because the microclimate surrounding the human body differs in thickness depending on the body segment and the surrounding environment. To accurately simulate the thermal environment, the numerical model was validated beforehand using experimental data collected in a climate chamber equipped with a thermal manikin. Furthermore, an example of the practical implementations of this coupling is reported in this paper through radiant floor cooling simulation cases, in which overall and local thermal sensation and comfort were investigated using the coupled UCB model. KW - Numerische Strömungssimulation KW - Mikroklima KW - Wärmeübergangszahl KW - Wärmeempfindung KW - computational fluid dynamics KW - microclimate KW - UCB model KW - heat transfer coefficient KW - thermal sensation Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190218-38517 UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ina.12451 N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the article published in Indoor Air 28 (3), 415-425 (2018) and may be found in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12451. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Copyright 2018 John Wiley & Sons. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the authors and John Wiley & Sons. VL - 2018 IS - 28, Heft 3 SP - 415 EP - 425 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Alsaad, Hayder A1 - Völker, Conrad T1 - Der Kühlungseffekt der personalisierten Lüftung T1 - The cooling effect of personalized ventilation systems JF - Bauphysik N2 - Personalisierte Lüftung (PL) kann die thermische Behaglichkeit sowie die Qualität der eingeatmeten Atemluft verbessern, in dem jedem Arbeitsplatz Frischluft separat zugeführt wird. In diesem Beitrag wird die Wirkung der PL auf die thermische Behaglichkeit der Nutzer unter sommerlichen Randbedingungen untersucht. Hierfür wurden zwei Ansätze zur Bewertung des Kühlungseffekts der PL untersucht: basierend auf (1) der äquivalenten Temperatur und (2) dem thermischen Empfinden. Grundlage der Auswertung sind in einer Klimakammer gemessene sowie numerisch simulierte Daten. Vor der Durchführung der Simulationen wurde das numerische Modell zunächst anhand der gemessenen Daten validiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass der Ansatz basierend auf dem thermischen Empfinden zur Evaluierung des Kühlungseffekts der PL sinnvoller sein kann, da bei diesem die komplexen physiologischen Faktoren besser berücksichtigt werden. N2 - Personalized ventilation (PV) can improve thermal comfort and inhaled air quality by supplying air to each workstation separately. This study investigates the impact of PV on the thermal state of the users under summer boundary conditions. Two approaches to evaluating the cooling effect of PV were investigated, based on equivalent temperature and based on thermal sensation. Both approaches implemented measured and simulated values of the cooling effect of PV. Before conducting the simulations, the numerical model was first validated against measured data collected in a climate chamber equipped with a thermal manikin. Results indicated that the thermal sensation approach can be more suitable for evaluating the cooling effect of PV due to the complex physiological factors it considers. KW - Lüftung KW - Strömung KW - Raumklima KW - Temperatur KW - personalized ventilation KW - computational fluid dynamics KW - Simulation KW - personalisierte Lüftung KW - äquivalente Temperatur KW - thermisches Empfinden Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201020-42723 UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bapi.202000018 N1 - © 2020 Ernst & Sohn Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin. Dieser Artikel kann für den persönlichen Gebrauch heruntergeladen werden. Andere Verwendungen bedürfen der vorherigen Zustimmung der Autoren und des Verlags Ernst & Sohn. Der folgende Artikel erschien in der Bauphysik 42 (2020), Heft 5, 218-225, DOI: 10.1002/bapi.202000018 VL - 2020 IS - volume 42, issue 5 SP - 218 EP - 225 PB - Ernst & Sohn bei John Wiley & Sons CY - Hoboken ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Alsaad, Hayder A1 - Völker, Conrad T1 - Performance evaluation of ductless personalized ventilation in comparison with desk fans using numerical simulations JF - Indoor Air N2 - The performance of ductless personalized ventilation (DPV) was compared to the performance of a typical desk fan since they are both stand-alone systems that allow the users to personalize their indoor environment. The two systems were evaluated using a validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of an office room occupied by two users. To investigate the impact of DPV and the fan on the inhaled air quality, two types of contamination sources were modelled in the domain: an active source and a passive source. Additionally, the influence of the compared systems on thermal comfort was assessed using the coupling of CFD with the comfort model developed by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB model). Results indicated that DPV performed generally better than the desk fan. It provided better thermal comfort and showed a superior performance in removing the exhaled contaminants. However, the desk fan performed better in removing the contaminants emitted from a passive source near the floor level. This indicates that the performance of DPV and desk fans depends highly on the location of the contamination source. Moreover, the simulations showed that both systems increased the spread of exhaled contamination when used by the source occupant. KW - Behaglichkeit KW - Raumklima KW - Strömungsmechanik KW - Fluid KW - computational fluid dynamics KW - desk fan KW - ductless personalized ventilation KW - IAQ KW - thermal comfort Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200422-41407 UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ina.12672 VL - 2020 PB - John Wiley & Sons Ltd ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Alsaad, Hayder A1 - Völker, Conrad T1 - Could the ductless personalized ventilation be an alternative to the regular ducted personalized ventilation? JF - Indoor Air N2 - This study investigates the performance of two systems: personalized ventilation (PV) and ductless personalized ventilation (DPV). Even though the literature indicates a compelling performance of PV, it is not often used in practice due to its impracticality. Therefore, the present study assesses the possibility of replacing the inflexible PV with DPV in office rooms equipped with displacement ventilation (DV) in the summer season. Numerical simulations were utilized to evaluate the inhaled concentration of pollutants when PV and DPV are used. The systems were compared in a simulated office with two occupants: a susceptible occupant and a source occupant. Three types of pollution were simulated: exhaled infectious air, dermally emitted contamination, and room contamination from a passive source. Results indicated that PV improved the inhaled air quality regardless of the location of the pollution source; a higher PV supply flow rate positively impacted the inhaled air quality. Contrarily, the performance of DPV was highly sensitive to the source location and the personalized flow rate. A higher DPV flow rate tends to decrease the inhaled air quality due to increased mixing of pollutants in the room. Moreover, both systems achieved better results when the personalized system of the source occupant was switched off. KW - Strömungsmechanik KW - Kontamination KW - Belüftung KW - Luftqualität KW - computational fluid dynamics KW - cross-contamination KW - ductless personalized ventilation KW - indoor air quality KW - tracer gas Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200805-42072 UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ina.12720 VL - 2020 PB - John Wiley & Sons Ltd ER -