TY - INPR A1 - Kavrakov, Igor A1 - Morgenthal, Guido T1 - A synergistic study of a CFD and semi-analytical models for aeroelastic analysis of bridges in turbulent wind conditions N2 - Long-span bridges are prone to wind-induced vibrations. Therefore, a reliable representation of the aerodynamic forces acting on a bridge deck is of a major significance for the design of such structures. This paper presents a systematic study of the two-dimensional (2D) fluid-structure interaction of a bridge deck under smooth and turbulent wind conditions. Aerodynamic forces are modeled by two approaches: a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and six semi-analytical models. The vortex particle method is utilized for the CFD model and the free-stream turbulence is introduced by seeding vortex particles upstream of the deck with prescribed spectral characteristics. The employed semi-analytical models are based on the quasi-steady and linear unsteady assumptions and aerodynamic coefficients obtained from CFD analyses. The underlying assumptions of the semi-analytical aerodynamic models are used to interpret the results of buffeting forces and aeroelastic response due to a free-stream turbulence in comparison with the CFD model. Extensive discussions are provided to analyze the effect of linear fluid memory and quasi-steady nonlinearity from a CFD perspective. The outcome of the analyses indicates that the fluid memory is a governing effect in the buffeting forces and aeroelastic response, while the effect of the nonlinearity is overestimated by the quasi-steady models. Finally, flutter analyses are performed and the obtained critical velocities are further compared with wind tunnel results, followed by a brief examination of the post-flutter behavior. The results of this study provide a deeper understanding of the extent of which the applied models are able to replicate the physical processes for fluid-structure interaction phenomena in bridge aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. KW - Ingenieurwissenschaften KW - Aerodynamik KW - Bridge KW - Aerodynamic nonlinearity KW - Fluid memory KW - Vortex particle method KW - Buffeting KW - Flutter Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200206-40873 N1 - This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889974617308423?via%3Dihub, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.06.013 ER - TY - INPR A1 - Kavrakov, Igor A1 - Morgenthal, Guido T1 - Aeroelastic analyses of bridges using a Pseudo-3D vortex method and velocity-based synthetic turbulence generation N2 - The accurate representation of aerodynamic forces is essential for a safe, yet reasonable design of long-span bridges subjected to wind effects. In this paper, a novel extension of the Pseudo-three-dimensional Vortex Particle Method (Pseudo-3D VPM) is presented for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) buffeting analysis of line-like structures. This extension entails an introduction of free-stream turbulent fluctuations, based on the velocity-based turbulence generation. The aerodynamic response of a long-span bridge is obtained by subjecting the 3D dynamic representation of the structure to correlated free-stream turbulence in two-dimensional (2D) fluid planes, which are positioned along the bridge deck. The span-wise correlation of the free-stream turbulence between the 2D fluid planes is established based on Taylor's hypothesis of frozen turbulence. Moreover, the application of the laminar Pseudo-3D VPM is extended to a multimode flutter analysis. Finally, the structural response from the Pseudo-3D flutter and buffeting analyses is verified with the response, computed using the semi-analytical linear unsteady model in the time-domain. Meaningful merits of the turbulent Pseudo-3D VPM with respect to the linear unsteady model are the consideration of the 2D aerodynamic nonlinearity, nonlinear fluid memory, vortex shedding and local non-stationary turbulence effects in the aerodynamic forces. The good agreement of the responses for the two models in the 3D analyses demonstrates the applicability of the Pseudo-3D VPM for aeroelastic analyses of line-like structures under turbulent and laminar free-stream conditions. KW - Bridge KW - Aerodynamik KW - Ingenieurwissenschaften KW - Computational Bridge Aerodynamics KW - Buffeting KW - Flutter KW - Long-span Bridges KW - Vortex Particle Method Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200206-40864 N1 - This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029617322976?via%3Dihub, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.093 ER -