TY - CHAP ED - Abarkan, Abdellah ED - Bihlmaier, Helene ED - Gimeno Sánchez, Andrea ED - Blaga, Andreea T1 - Second urbanHIST Conference. Interpreting 20th Century European Urbanism N2 - urbanHIST (2019). Second urbanHIST Conference. Interpreting 20th Century European Urbanism. Stockholm, 21–23 October 2019 Conference Booklet KW - Städtebau KW - Planung KW - Geschichte KW - Stadtgeschichte KW - urbanHIST KW - planning history KW - urban history Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201218-43046 CY - Karlskrona ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bach, Joachim T1 - Gropius' Erbe und das Problem des Fortschritts im heutigen Städtebau N2 - Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 5. bis 7. Juli 1983 in Weimar an der Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen zum Thema: 'Das Bauhauserbe und die gegenwärtige Entwicklung der Architektur : zum 100. Geburtstag von Walter Gropius' T3 - Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift / Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen - 29.1983,5-6/429-431 KW - Gropius KW - Walter KW - Städtebau KW - Bauhaus-Kolloquium KW - Weimar KW - 1983 Y1 - 1983 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-9804 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Barth, Holger A1 - Hellberg, Lennart T1 - Otto Haesler und der Städtebau der DDR in den fünfziger Jahren N2 - Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 18. bis 21. Juni 1992 in Weimar an der Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen zum Thema: ‚Architektur und Macht’ T3 - Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift / Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen - 39.1993,1-2/43-51 KW - Haesler KW - Otto KW - Deutschland KW - Städtebau KW - Bauhaus-Kolloquium KW - Weimar KW - 1992 Y1 - 1993 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-11369 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Beese, Christine T1 - About the Internationality of Urbanism: The Influence of International Town Planning Ideas upon Marcello Piacentini’s Work T2 - Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography N2 - Beiträge zum Symposium „Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography“. Weimar, 21.-22. November 2013 N2 - For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results. Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened to include those of general historical studies. With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics. The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service). KW - Städtebau KW - town planning KW - civic design KW - civic center KW - city extension KW - regional planning KW - Joseph Stübben KW - school of architecture KW - Gustavo Giovannoni KW - Marcello Piacentini KW - Fascism KW - Italy, Rome Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20150619-24093 SP - 1 EP - 22 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Beyme, Klaus von T1 - Sowjetische Einflüsse auf den frühen Städtebau der DDR N2 - Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 18. bis 21. Juni 1992 in Weimar an der Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen zum Thema: ‚Architektur und Macht' T3 - Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift / Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen - 39.1993,1-2/15-20 KW - Deutschland KW - Städtebau KW - Sowjetunion KW - Bauhaus-Kolloquium KW - Weimar KW - 1992 Y1 - 1993 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-11449 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Birkholz, Marie Luise T1 - Granite on the Ground: Former Nazi Party Rally Grounds, Nuremberg/Germany. A brief introduction T2 - Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography N2 - Beiträge zum Symposium „Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography“. Weimar, 21.-22. November 2013 N2 - For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results. Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened to include those of general historical studies. With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics. The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service). KW - Städtebau KW - material KW - dictatorial design KW - political intention KW - pavement KW - Second World War KW - preservation Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20150925-24587 SP - 1 EP - 12 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bollerey, Franziska T1 - The changing face of european metopolis : the culture of urbanism N2 - Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 18. bis 21. Juni 1992 in Weimar an der Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen zum Thema: ‚Architektur und Macht’ T3 - Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift / Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen - 39.1993,1-2/139-141 KW - Europa KW - Metropole KW - Städtebau KW - Bauhaus-Kolloquium KW - Weimar KW - 1992 Y1 - 1993 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-11351 ER - TY - THES A1 - Bölling, Lars T1 - Das Bild der Zwischenstadt. Dekodierung und Inszenierung "räumlicher Identität" als Potenzial zur Qualifizierung der verstädterten Landschaft. T1 - The Image of the Zwischenstadt. Decoding and creating spatial identity as a way to improve the urbanised landscape. N2 - Die Arbeit „Das Bild der Zwischenstadt“ sucht nach Möglichkeiten zur Qualifizierung der verstädterten Landschaft, für die Thomas Sieverts den Begriff „Zwischenstadt“ geprägt hat. Die Auseinandersetzung mit „räumlicher Identität“ steht dabei im Mittelpunkt: In deren Dekodierung und Inszenierung wird ein Potenzial erkannt, die Aufenthalts- und Erlebnisqualität der Zwischenstadt zu verbessern. Der Betrachtungsraum der Arbeit zwischen Frankfurt am Main und seinen prosperierenden Umlandgemeinden eignet sich in besonderer Weise, die „Anatomie der Zwischenstadt“ zu dekodieren. Schicht für Schicht wird der Versuch unternommen, die eigene Sprache dieses Raumes zu entziffern. Dabei werden Methoden der Beschreibung und Darstellung entwickelt, die den spezifischen räumlichen Eigenschaft der Zwischenstadt gerecht zu werden suchen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Auseinandersetzung lassen deutliche Transformationen in der Zwischenstadt erkennen und entheben sie aus ihrer vermeintlichen Eigenschaftslosigkeit. Orte mit Bedeutung, Zusammenhänge und Raumgeschichten werden lesbar, es zeigen sich Ansätze eigener Urbanität und Zentralität. Die Zwischenstadt hat sich von ihrer einseitigen Dependenz zur Kernstadt gelöst, tritt aber gleichzeitig in einen umfassenden Wandel, um sich geänderten Lebensformen und Bedürfnissen anzupassen. Ältere, den Raum prägende Einfamilienhausgebiete und Großsiedlungen, aber auch monofunktionale Gewerbegebiete und die typischen suburbanen Einkaufszentren erfüllen keineswegs mehr automatisch die Wohnwünsche und Anforderungen einer Dienstleistungs- und Freizeitgesellschaft. Die Arbeit greift die unverkennbare Transformation des Bildes der Zwischenstadt als Chance zur Qualifizierung dieses Raumes auf. Entwickelt werden Qualifizierungsmodelle, die der Tendenz zu Segregation und Abtrennung mit einer neuen Integrationskultur für die Zwischenstadt begegnen: Als prägender Lebensraum der Stadtregion muss die Zwischenstadt einen großen Teil der Bedürfnisse Ihrer Bewohner und Benutzer an den Raum befriedigen. Zunehmend sind diese Bedürfnisse nicht nur funktioneller Art, sondern werden überlagert von einem Bedürfnis nach Raumqualität, Verortung und Identifikationsmöglichkeiten. Für diese Bedürfnisse angemessene und auratische Raumbilder zu finden oder zu inszenieren, ist im Angesicht des Status Quo der Stadtlandschaft eine wichtige Herausforderung. N2 - In “The Image of the Zwischenstadt” (“Das Bild der Zwischenstadt”) possibilities are sought to qualify the urbanized landscape, for which Thomas Sieverts coined the term Zwischenstadt. Particular focus is placed on the examination of “spatial identity”. In its decryption and presentation a potential to improve the attractiveness of experience and quality of life in the Zwischenstadt is to be found. The area examined between the city of Frankfurt am Main and the prosperous communities surrounding it is particularly suited to decrypt the anatomy of the Zwischenstadt. Layer by layer the attempt is made to decipher the unique language of this space. At the same time, methods of description and presentation are being developed which are capable of doing justice to the specific spatial qualities of the Zwischenstadt. The results of this examination show that the Zwischenstadt has undergone significant changes and release it from its supposed facelessness. Rather, places with meaning, context and history emerge; the beginnings of an independent urbanity and centrality can be seen. The Zwischenstadt has been able to detach itself from its one-sided dependence on the central city, while at the same time undergoing a comprehensive transformation to cope with the changes in needs and ways of life. By no means do the older neighborhoods of single family homes and large residential estates which had characterized the area, or single-function industrial areas and typical suburban shopping centers, continue to automatically fulfill the housing requirements and desires of a leisure society in a service economy. The paper seizes the unmistakable transformation in the image of the Zwischenstadt as an opportunity to qualify this space. Qualification models are developed within it which confront the tendency for segregation and separation with a new culture of integration for the Zwischenstadt. As the formative living environment in the urban area, the Zwischenstadt must satisfy most of the needs its inhabitants and consumers have regarding the area. Increasingly, these needs are not only of a functional variety, but are being superimposed by a need for spatial quality, a sense of belonging and the ability to identify with the area. Given the status quo, finding and producing appropriate and auratic spatial defining elements remains an important challenge. KW - Architektur KW - Städtebau KW - Stadtplanung KW - Suburbanisierung KW - Zentrum-Peripherie-Modell KW - Stadtentwicklung KW - Vorstadt KW - Architekturgeschichtsschreibung KW - Zwischenstadt KW - Suburbia KW - Peripherie KW - Zersiedlung KW - Suburbia KW - Sprawl KW - Suburbanisation KW - urban landscape KW - townplanning Y1 - 2007 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20090122-14598 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Cabrita, Maria Amélia T1 - Portuguese Social Housing under Dictatorship. A Morphological Analysis of Some Residential Agglomerations in Lisbon (1933-1950) T2 - Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography N2 - Beiträge zum Symposium „Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography“. Weimar, 21.-22. November 2013 N2 - For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results. Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened to include those of general historical studies. With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics. The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service). KW - Städtebau KW - dictatorship KW - social housing KW - economic houses program KW - policy objectives KW - housing typologies Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20150731-24407 SP - 1 EP - 10 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Cravo, Salete A. F. T1 - Restelo in Lisbon - The Non-implementation of the Original Urban Design by Faria da Costa during the Dictatorship of António de Oliveira Salazar T2 - Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography N2 - Beiträge zum Symposium „Urban design and dictatorship in the 20th century: Italy, Portugal, the Soviet Union, Spain and Germany. History and Historiography“. Weimar, 21.-22. November 2013 N2 - For decades in Germany, historical research on dictatorial urban design in the first half of the 20th century focused on the National Socialist period. Studies on the urban design practices of other dictatorships remained an exception. This has changed. Meanwhile, the urban production practices of the Mussolini, Stalin, Salazar, Hitler and Franco dictatorships have become the subject of comprehensive research projects. Recently, a research group that studies dictatorial urban design in 20th century Europe has emerged at the Bauhaus-Institut für Geschichte und Theorie der Architektur und der Planung. The group is already able to refer to various research results. Part of the research group’s self-conception is the assumption that the urban design practices of the named dictatorships can only be properly understood from a European perspective. The dictatorships influenced one another substantially. Furthermore, the specificities of the practices of each dictatorship can only be discerned if one can compare them to those of the other dictatorships. This approach requires strict adherence to the research methods of planning history and urban design theory. Meanwhile, these methods must be opened to include those of general historical studies. With this symposium, the research group aims to further qualify this European perspective. The aim is to pursue an inventory of the various national historiographies on the topic of “urban design and dictatorship”. This inventory should offer an overview on the general national level of historical research on urban design as well as on the level of particular urban design projects, persons or topics. The symposium took place in Weimar, November 21-22, 2013. It was organized by Harald Bodenschatz, Piero Sassi and Max Welch Guerra and funded by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service). KW - Städtebau KW - urban design KW - António de Oliveira Salazar KW - Duarte Pacheco KW - Étienne de Groër KW - Faria Da Costa KW - Encosta Da Ajuda/Restelo Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20150619-24111 SP - 1 EP - 17 ER -