@phdthesis{Smirnova,
  author    = {Smirnova, Elena},
  title     = {"Kennst du das Land, wo bl{\"u}ht Oranienbaum?" - A Case Study on Strategic and Territorial Planning in St. Petersburg (Russia)},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3255},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170711-32556},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {The research examines the system of strategic and territorial planning of St. Petersburg focusing on Lomonosov (Oranienbaum) as its case study. The study provides the analysis of the planning documentation developed for the city in the post-Soviet period. In particular, it elaborates on the currently enforced Strategy of Economic and Social Development of St. Petersburg-2030 (2014) and the City General Plan (2005), discussing the aspects of their development and implementation, as well as complex interrelation. Thereby, peculiarities of the spatial development of the St. Petersburg agglomeration are also investigated, elaborating on the state policy on agglomerations, historic development of St. Petersburg and relations with the Leningrad Region, governance and imbalances of the St. Petersburg spatial development, including proposed development scenarios. Consequently, the study employs a highly indicative case of the Lomonosov town municipal unit aiming to illustrate the practical implementation of administrative, territorial and strategic policies in a given context within a system of the state planning adopted in St. Petersburg, in particular, taking into consideration recently proclaimed necessity for the transition to a polycentric city model following an innovative scenario for the socioeconomic and spatial development. In particular, Lomonosov (Oranienbaum) is explored egarding its current socio-economic situation and development scenarios: industrial site and cultural tourism. The Oranienbaum museum and nature-reserve is also thoroughly assessed with regard to its cultural tourism potential. Finally, the urban environment of Lomonosov (Oranienbaum) is comprehensively scrutinized in terms of its historic development, residential housing typology, UNESCO World Heritage preservation and local urban heritage. In conclusion, the data on Lomonosov present in the St. Petersburg strategic and territorial planning documents is provided.},
  subject      = {Lomonossow},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Hollberg,
  author    = {Hollberg, Alexander},
  title     = {A parametric method for building design optimization based on Life Cycle Assessment},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3800},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20180928-38000},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {262},
  abstract  = {The building sector is responsible for a large share of human environmental impacts. Architects and planners are the key players for reducing the environmental impacts of buildings, as they define them to a large extent. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) allows for the holistic environmental analysis of a building. However, it is currently not employed to improve the environmental performance of buildings during the design process, although the potential for optimization is greatest there. One main reason is the lack of an adequate means of applying LCA in the architectural design process. As such, the main objective of this thesis is to develop a method for environmental building design optimization that is applicable in the design process. The key concept proposed in this thesis is to combine LCA with parametric design, because it proved to have a high potential for design optimization. The research approach includes the analysis of the characteristics of LCA for buildings and the architectural design stages to identify the research gap, the establishment of a requirement catalogue, the development of a method based on a digital, parametric model, and an evaluation of the method. An analysis of currently available approaches for LCA of buildings indicates that they are either holistic but very complex or simple but not holistic. Furthermore, none of them provide the opportunity for optimization in the architectural design process, which is the main research gap. The requirements derived from the analysis have been summarized in the form of a catalogue. This catalogue can be used to evaluate both existing approaches and potential methods developed in the future. In this thesis, it served as guideline for the development of the parametric method - Parametric Life Cycle Assessment (PLCA). The unique main feature of PLCA is that embodied and operational environmental impact are calculated together. In combination with the self-contained workflow of the method, this provides the basis for holistic, time-efficient environmental design optimization. The application of PLCA to three examples indicated that all established mandatory requirements are met. In all cases, environmental impact could be significantly reduced. In comparison to conventional approaches, PLCA was shown to be much more time-efficient. PLCA allows architects to focus on their main task of designing the building, and finally makes LCA practically useful as one of several criteria for design optimization. With PLCA, the building design can be time-efficiently optimized from the beginning of the most influential early design stages, which has not been possible until now. PLCA provides a good starting point for further research. In the future, it could be extended by integrating the social and economic aspects of sustainability.},
  subject      = {Bauentwurf},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{MizrakBilen,
  author    = {Mizrak Bilen, Burcin},
  title     = {A Power-Centered Approach to the Capitalization of Climate Change in Property Sector and Strategic Limitation},
  doi       = {10.25643/BAUHAUS-UNIVERSITAET.3840},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190107-38406},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {256},
  abstract  = {The capitalization of 'certified' sustainable building sector will be investigated over the power theory of value approach of Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler. The study will be initiated by questioning why the environment problems are one of the first items on the agenda and by sharing the ideas of scholars who approaches the subject skeptically, because the predominant literature underlying the necessity and prominence of the topic is already well-known and adapted by the majority. Over the theory developed by Nitzan and Bichler, the concepts of capitalization, strategic sabotage, power, legitimacy, and obedience will be discussed. The hypothesis of "the absentee owners of the construction sector, holding the whip hand and capitalizing the ecology, control the growth and the creativity of green building production and make it carbon-dependent, in order to increase their profit margin" will be questioned. To strengthen the arguments in the hypothesis, the factors, the institutional arrangements, value measurement methods, which affect directly the net present value, will be investigated both in corporation and in building scale in detail, because net present value/ capitalization is asserted as the most important criteria by Nitzan and Bichler to make the investment decisions in the capitalist economic system. To trace the implications of power and the strategic sabotage that power caused, as the empirical dimension of this dissertation, an interface exploring the correlational ties between the climate responsive architecture and the ever changing political, economical, and social contexts and building economics praxis by decades will be developed and the expert interviews will be conducted with the design teams and the appraisers.},
  subject      = {Klima{\"a}nderung},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Lutolli,
  author    = {Lutolli, Blerim},
  title     = {A Review of Domed Cities and Architecture: Past, Present and Future},
  series = {Future cities and environment},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Future cities and environment},
  number    = {Volume 8, issue 1},
  publisher = {Ubiquity Press Limited},
  address   = {London},
  doi       = {10.5334/fce.154},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20221103-47335},
  pages     = {1 -- 9},
  abstract  = {The goal of architecture is changing in response to the expanding role of cities, rapid urbanization, and transformation under changing economic, environmental, social, and demographic factors. As cities increased in the early modern era, overcrowding, urbanization, and pollution conditions led reformers to consider the future shape of the cities. One of the most critical topics in contemporary architecture is the subject of the future concepts of living. In most cases, domed cities, as a future concept of living, are rarely considered, and they are used chiefly as "utopian" visions in the discourse of future ways of living. This paper highlights the reviews of domed cities to deepen the understanding of the idea in practice, like its approach in terms of architecture. The main aim of this paper is to provide a broad overview for domed cities in the face of pollution as one of the main concerns in many European cities. As a result, the significance of the reviews of the existing projects is focused on their conceptual quality. This review will pave the way for further studies in terms of future developments in the realm of domed cities. In this paper, the city of Celje, one of the most polluted cities in Slovenia, is taken as a case study for considering the concept of Dome incorporated due to the lack of accessible literature on the topic. This review's primary contribution is to allow architects to explore a broad spectrum of innovation by comparing today's achievable statuses against the possibilities generated by domed cities. As a result of this study, the concept of living under the Dome remains to be developed in theory and practice. The current challenging climatic situation will accelerate the evolution of these concepts, resulting in the formation of new typologies, which are a requirement for humanity.},
  subject      = {Architektur},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-2696,
  title     = {Alles Heritage?},
  editor    = {Angermann, Kirsten and Engelberg-Dockal, Eva von and Warda, Johannes},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2696},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20161110-26961},
  pages     = {86},
  abstract  = {Die Erweiterung des Denkmalbegriffs hat zu einer Expansion des Erinnerns, Sch{\"u}tzens, Bewahrens und Tradierens auf alle Bereiche des Lebens gef{\"u}hrt. Heute werden nicht nur Scheunen, Tankstellen und Großwohnsiedlungen als Teil des historischen Erbes unter Denkmalschutz gestellt, sondern auch kulturelle Praktiken und Br{\"a}uche zum „immateriellen" Weltkulturerbe erkl{\"a}rt. Die Folge dieser als „Denkmal-Inflation" kritisierten Entwicklung ist eine versch{\"a}rfte Konkurrenz um Aufmerksamkeit und finanzielle Zuwendungen. Letzteres spiegelt sich nicht zuletzt in einer zunehmenden, maßgeblich von der Tourismusindustrie gef{\"o}rderten publikumswirksamen Inszenierung des Erbes. Im Zeitalter der „Heritage Industry" (Robert Hewison, 1987) bilden Kulturg{\"u}ter aber nicht nur einen wichtigen Standortfaktor, sondern wird das „Erbe" selbst zunehmend mittels internationaler Charten, Deklarationen, Plaketten und Social Media-Kampagnen konstruiert. Dies geschieht vorwiegend innerhalb eines anglophonen Diskurses, der aber an die deutschsprachigen begriffs- und ideengeschichtlich gepr{\"a}gten Diskussionen strenggenommen nicht anschlussf{\"a}hig ist. Dort l{\"a}sst sich ein - in einem {\"a}hnlichen Sinne umfassend zu nennender - Erbe-Begriff zwar bereits f{\"u}r die Heimatschutzbewegung konstatieren, eine fachlich ausdifferenzierte Denkmalpflege, wie wir sie heute kennen, tut sich jedoch schwer, ein solches universelles Konzept zu integrieren. W{\"a}hrend die „Heritagisierung" durch internationale Organisationen zu einer Verschiebung des Fokus von Baudenkmalen hin zur allgemeinen Bewahrung von Kulturerbe f{\"u}hrt (das immaterielle eingeschlossen, siehe etwa die Burra Charter), bleibt der Denkmal- und Erbe-Diskurs in den deutschsprachigen L{\"a}ndern bislang klar auf Baudenkmale und st{\"a}dtebauliche Ensembles konzentriert. Letzteres zeigt sich auch im Vorfeld des European Cultural Heritage Year 2018, das in Deutschland im Gegensatz zu anderen europ{\"a}ischen L{\"a}ndern maßgeblich von Denkmalschutzorganisationen getragen wird. Die Wende hin zum Heritage l{\"a}sst sich gleichermaßen bei neuen Forschungsfeldern und Ausbildungswegen der Denkmalpflege beobachten. So werden heute „Heritage Tourism" und „Dark Heritage" als spezifische Formen der „Denkmalnutzung" untersucht und bilden - in Erg{\"a}nzung zu den klassischen Disziplinen Kunstgeschichte, Architektur und Planung - „Heritage Management" und „Heritage Studies" grundst{\"a}ndige Studieng{\"a}nge. Letzteres gilt inzwischen auch f{\"u}r die deutschsprachigen L{\"a}nder. Der Weg f{\"u}hrt damit weg von der spezialisierten Kennerschaft zum Allrounder mit neuen Schwerpunkten auf Marketing, Verwaltung und Vermittlung. Mit Blick auf sozio-kulturelle Entwicklungen erweist sich, dass der Heritage-Begriff vor allem im {\"o}konomischen und politischen Diskurs weitgehend affirmativ gebraucht wird. Heritage geht demnach mit einem gewissen moralischen wie missionarischen Impetus einher, verbunden mit einer (Kultur-)Politik der „Identit{\"a}tsstiftung". In Zeiten, in denen „Identit{\"a}t" wieder als politisches Schlagwort im gesellschaftlichen Diskurs fungiert, scheint es um so wichtiger, die wissenschaftliche Besch{\"a}ftigung mit Heritage, die zugrunde liegenden begrifflichen Konzepte und pr{\"a}skriptiven Programme, kritisch zu reflektieren.},
  subject      = {Kulturerbe},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Bredella,
  author    = {Bredella, Nathalie},
  title     = {ARCHITECTURE AND ATMOSPHERE},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3079},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30794},
  pages     = {10},
  abstract  = {Nathalie Bredella is an architect. She was educated at the TU Berlin and Cooper Union, New York. She received a PhD in Architectural Theory. She taught architectural design at the TU Berlin. She ist the author of Architekturen des Zuschauens. Imagin{\"a}re und reale R{\"a}ume im Film (transcript-verlag). The work is based on an interdisciplinary approach incorporating architecture, film theory and philosophy. Her interests in architectural practice focus on the relationship between spatial strategies, film and media on an urban and architectural scale.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Schneider,
  author    = {Schneider, Tatjana},
  title     = {ARCHITECTURE FIDDLES WHILE THE WORLD BURNS},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3063},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30639},
  pages     = {9},
  abstract  = {Tatjana Schneider is lecturer at the School of Architecture, University of Sheffield. She holds a PhD in architecture. She worked in architectural practice in Germany and the UK, and has taught, lectured and published widely (including 'Flexible Housing' with Jeremy Till). She was a member of the worker's cooperative G.L.A.S. (Glasgow Letters on Architecture and Space), which undertook agit-prop works, educational workshops, community based design consultancy and produced the quarterly journal glaspaper. Her work focuses on the production and political economy of the built environment. Current work includes the research 'Spatial Agency'.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{OPUS4-3089,
  title     = {ARCHITECTURE IN TIMES OF NEED},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {GRAFT},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3089},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30897},
  pages     = {6},
  abstract  = {GRAFT is an architectural firm located in Los Angeles, Berlin, and Beijing. Their collective professional experience encompasses a wide array of building types including Fine Arts, Educational, Institutional, Commercial and Residential facilities. The firm has won numerous awards in Europe as well as in the United States. GRAFT was established in 1998 in Los Angeles by Lars Kr{\"u}ckeberg, Wolfram Putz and Thomas Willemeit and opened an office in Berlin in 2001. In 2003 GRAFT opened an office in Beijing with Gregor Hoheisel as partner for the asian market. In 2007 Alejandra Lillo became Partner for the office in Los Angeles. GRAFT was conceived as a 'Label' for Architecture, Urban Planning, Design, Music, and the "pursuit of happiness". Since the firm was established, it has been commissioned to design and manage a wide range of projects in multiple disciplines and locations. With the core of the firm's enterprises gravitating around the field of architecture and the built environment, GRAFT has always maintained an interest in crossing the boundaries between disciplines and "grafting" the creative potentials and methodologies of different realities. This is reflected in the firm's expansion into the fields of exhibition design and product design, art installations, academic projects and "events" as well as in the variety of project locations in Germany, China, UAE, Russia, Georgia, in the U.S. and Mexico, to name a few.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Schrijver,
  author    = {Schrijver, Lara},
  title     = {ARCHITECTURE: PROJECTIVE, CRITICAL OR CRAFT?},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3065},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30654},
  pages     = {16},
  abstract  = {Lara Schrijver is an assistant professor at the Faculty of Architecture of the TU Delft. She is one of three program leaders for a new research program in the department of architecture, 'The Architectural Project and its Foundations'. Schrijver holds degrees in architecture from Princeton University and the TU Delft. She received her Ph.D. from the TU Eindhoven in 2005. Schrijver has taught design and theory courses, and contributed to conferences in the Netherlands as well as abroad. She was an editor for OASE, journal for architecture, for ten years, and was co-organizer of the 2006 conference 'The Projective Landscape'. Her current work revolves around the role of architecture in the city, and its responsibility in defining the public domain. Her first book, Radical Games, on the influence of the 1960s on contemporary discourse, is forthcoming in the spring of 2009.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{LippertVieira,
  author    = {Lippert-Vieira, Sandra},
  title     = {BAUHAUS, GEMEINSCHAFT, BIOPOLITIK UND WEITER?},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3071},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30710},
  pages     = {16},
  abstract  = {Sandra Lippert-Vieira, 1971 in Lissabon, Portugal geboren, schloss 1995 ihr Architekturstudium an der Universidade Lus{\´i}ada in Lissabon ab. Bis 2003 arbeitete sie als Freie Architektin in Lissabon und war Entwurfsassistentin an der Universidade Moderne und Universidade Lus{\´o}fona in Lissabon bei Prof. em. Am{\^a}ncio d'Alpoim Guedes, Lehrstuhl f{\"u}r Entwurf. Derzeit ist sie wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin im Fachgebiet Geb{\"a}udelehre bei Prof. Daniele Marques, Institut f{\"u}r Entwerfen, Kunst und Theorie, KIT - Karlsruher Institut f{\"u}r Technologie. Sie promovierte an der BTU Cottbus, Prof. F{\"u}hr, zum Thema „Dissoziative Architektur. Zwischen Teufelskralle und Scheinriese. Wege zu einem weiteren Verst{\"a}ndnis der Architektur des Expressionismus." Bisherige Ver{\"o}ffentlichungen: „Wege zu einer Rezeptions{\"a}sthetik in der Architektur: das implizite Leben der gebauten Welt," in: Wolkenkuckucksheim (Heft 2/08); „Texte und Kontexte" von J{\"u}rgen Habermas und „Martin Heidegger. Unterwegs zu seiner Biographie" von Hugo Ott. Forschungsschwerpunkte: Expressionistische Architektur, Outsider Architektur, Architekturinterpretationsmethoden, Avantgarde und Postanarchismus.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {de}
}