@misc{Lenz,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Lenz, Juliane},
  title     = {„Baus{\"u}nde" oder Denkmal? Zur Diskussion {\"u}ber den Umgang mit verschm{\"a}hten Bauwerken},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.6397},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230606-63979},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {187},
  abstract  = {F{\"u}r die einen also „Baus{\"u}nde", f{\"u}r die anderen ein erhaltenswertes Bauwerk - wie geht man damit um? F{\"u}r wen gilt wann etwas als „Baus{\"u}nde" und wann als erhaltenswert, welche Ziele werden damit verfolgt und Konzepte aufgezeigt? Inwieweit spielen beispielsweise Aspekte wie {\"A}sthetik, Funktionalit{\"a}t oder der allgemeine gesellschaftliche Kontext bzw. Wandel sowie das jeweils aktuelle und bauzeitliche planerische Leitbild bzw. Verst{\"a}ndnis eine Rolle bei der Verwendung des Begriffs und den Umgang f{\"u}r konkrete Bauwerke? Und inwieweit steht der Erhaltungswert bzw. eine Denkmalw{\"u}rdigkeit damit im Verh{\"a}ltnis und wie kann damit planerisch umgegangen werden? Der Diskussion {\"u}ber den Umgang mit verschm{\"a}hten Bauwerken will sich die vorliegende Abschlussarbeit n{\"a}hern. Als Bauwerke werden hierbei sowohl Geb{\"a}ude und Pl{\"a}tze als auch zur Erinnerung gesetzte Objekte wie Statuen verstanden.},
  subject      = {Denkmalpflege},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{MacielCostadaSilva,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Maciel Costa da Silva, Luiza},
  title     = {Smart Cities and Mobility Stations: Lessons learned from the Smarter Together in Vienna and Munich},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4270},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201012-42702},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {110},
  abstract  = {With an increasing urban population and urban problems arising from this unplanned growth, several projects aimed at promoting sustainable urban development have emerged. Smart mobility strategies, such as shared mobility and mobility stations, represent some of the solutions to promote changes in travel behavior. Despite its beneficial impacts, however, the implementation of such infrastructure is criticized for not contributing to current urban issues, as well as often disregarding knowledge about urban space and its functioning. In this context, the Smarter Together, a joint research and innovation project funded through the European Union program H2020, was implemented. The project selected three lighthouse cities to test and upscale innovative solutions: Vienna, Munich, and Lyon. This master thesis presents the main characteristics of the mobility stations systems implemented in Vienna and Munich in the scope of the project Smarter Together. Its main goal is to share what can be learned from their experiences while approaching critically the concept of smart cities. This master thesis identifies important aspects to take into account when planning, implementing, and operating mobility stations, and provides an understanding of smart cities and smart mobility that goes beyond the adoption of technology. Several methods were combined for the development of this master thesis, such as quantitative secondary data, observational studies, application of survey forms, explorative expert interviews, and literature review. This work has demonstrated that the Smarter Together has a cutting-edge scope and contributed greatly to research and innovation, by creating living laboratories to test the application of technology in the urban environment. However, from the perspective of the mobility stations assessment, many caveats were made. In short, many lessons could be learned and are presented throughout this work aiming at contributing to the improvement of the mobility stations implemented in the project areas in Munich and Vienna, as well as for inspiring other cities in Europe and worldwide.},
  subject      = {Intelligente Stadt},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{MendoncadeAlmeida,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Mendon{\c{c}}a de Almeida, Karina},
  title     = {Why isn't Google welcome in Kreuzberg? Social movement and the effects of Internet on urban space},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4244},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200924-42446},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {132},
  abstract  = {Advances in information and communication technologies such as the Internet have driven a great transformation in the interactions between individuals and the urban environment. As the use of the Internet in cities becomes more intense and diverse, there is also a restructuring of urban space, which is experienced by groups in society in various ways, according to the specificity of each context. Accordingly, large Internet companies have emerged as new players in the processes of urbanization, either through partnerships with the public administration or through various services offered directly to urban residents. Once these corporations are key actors in the digitalization of urban services, their operations can affect the patterns of urban inequality and generate a series of new struggles over the production of space. Interested in analyzing this phenomena from the perspective of civil society, the present Master Thesis examined a social movement that prevented Google to settle a new startup campus in the district of Kreuzberg, in Berlin. By asking why Google was not welcome in that context, this study also sought to understand how internet, as well as its main operators, has affected everyday life in the city. Thus, besides analyzing the movement, I investigated the particularities of the urban context where it arose and the elements that distinguish the mobilization's opponent. In pursuit of an interdisciplinary approach, I analyzed and discussed the results of empirical research in dialogue with critical theories in the fields of urban studies and the Internet, with emphasis on Castells' definitions of urban social movements and network society (1983, 2009, 2015), Couldry's and Mejias' (2019) idea of data colonialism, Lef{\`e}bvre's (1991, 1996) concepts of abstract space and the right to the city, as well as Zuboff's (2019) theory of surveillance capitalism. The case at hand has exposed that Google plays a prominent role in the way the Internet has been developed and deployed in cities. From the perspective accessed, the current appropriation of Internet technologies has been detrimental to individual autonomy and has contributed to intensifying existing inequalities in the city. The alternative vision to this relies mainly on the promotion of decentralized solidarity networks.},
  subject      = {Soziale Bewegung},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Pessoa,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Pessoa, Suelen},
  title     = {Why do the Archives archive? A journey from the hunko to the counter-ethnography and back},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4328},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210112-43280},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {A complex artistic research on the theme of cultural heritage and (neo)colonial processes of material and immaterial expropriation. Starting from the encounter with a phonographic relic at the Berliner Phonogramm-Archiv, the artist embarks on a journey to her own roots embodied in the practice of the Afro-Brazilian religion Candombl{\´e}. In the form of a theoretical treatise, an archive (photos, diagrams, maps, newspaper clippings, letters, documents), as well as a sound performance in the public space of the city of Weimar, several theoretical and performative elements are brought together in this transmedia artistic research that proposes a true decolonial practice.},
  subject      = {K{\"u}nstlerische Forschung},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Vittu,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Vittu, Elodie},
  title     = {Die Gestaltung eines Platzes in dem Sanierungs- und Quartiersmanagementgebiet Helmholtzplatz: „ein Platz f{\"u}r alle"? : Kritische Betrachtung gegens{\"a}tzlicher Positionen zur behutsamen Stadterneuerung am Prenzlauer Berg, Bilanz},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1956},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20130622-19565},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {Die Kurzfassung ist auf deutsch und die ganze Arbeit + Anh{\"a}nge auf franz{\"o}sisch. AUSGANGSPUNKT Die Spannung zwischen Sanierung und sozialem Wandel Nach dem Wegzug der mittleren Schichten aus den Innenst{\"a}dten gibt es seit mehr als 50 Jahren ein {\"o}ffentliches Bestreben, europ{\"a}ische St{\"a}dte zu sanieren. Damit soll die Attraktivit{\"a}t dieser Stadtteile gesteigert sowie Investitionen gef{\"o}rdert werden. In mehreren wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten und empirischen Untersuchungen {\"u}ber die Ergebnisse dieser Sanierungspolitik haben Forscher vor den negativen Effekten f{\"u}r die Anwohner gewarnt und den Begriff der „Gentrifizierung" eingef{\"u}hrt. Die Aufwertung der Innenst{\"a}dte sei mit einem sozialen Umstrukturierungsprozess durch den wachsenden Druck am Wohnungsmarkt und eine kontinuierliche Mietpreiserh{\"o}hung verbunden. FRAGESTELLUNG Die Sanierungsprojekte, die in den 80er-Jahren im Rahmen der I.B.A. entwickelt wurden, sind international als „good practice" bezeichnet worden. Die zw{\"o}lf Leits{\"a}tze der „behutsamen Stadterneuerung" sind das Vorzeigekind der deutschen Sanierungspraxis. Diese Erfahrungen wurden nach dem Fall der Mauer auf die Situation im Prenzlauer Berg {\"u}bertragen. Die vorliegende Arbeit (in franz{\"o}sischer Sprache) ist der Frage nachgegangen, inwiefern die behutsame Stadterneuerung in Berlin Prenzlauer Berg als Modell st{\"a}dtebaulicher Politik im Altbaugebiet dienen kann? „Modell" ist dabei nicht als Reproduktionsmodell, sondern im Sinne von „Vorbild" gemeint. ...},
  subject      = {Stadt / Planung},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Genc,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Genc, Emir},
  title     = {Decoding Public Life in Urban Soundscape: The Case of Weimar},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2743},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170213-27438},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {INTRODUCTION The research field of sound landscape and public life, initially drew my attention during the master class of 'Media of the Urban', originally 'Medien des Urbanen, which was given by Prof. Dr. Gabriele Schabacher in the 2015 summer semester. For the relevant class, I conducted an conceptual case study in Istanbul, Beyoglu District, with the intention of analysing the perception of the space by urban sound. During the summer 2015 I recorded various sounds of different spatial settings and developed the analysis by comparing the situations. By that time, I realized the inherent property of the sound as a medium for our perception in urban context. In the 2015-2016 winter semester, I participated in the master class of the architectural project, named 'Build Allegory', which was given by Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Heike B{\"u}ttner. The project was situated in Berlin Westkreuz, AVUS north curve, on the highway and was originally a race track from 1921. In this context, the aim of my project was to answer various questions, main of which was, how does the architectural form shape the sound of the place? And, how does the sound of the place shape the architectural from? Since the place is still serving mainly to the vehicles, although the function has differed, the sound objects and the context have remained. Through the existence of contextual references, I started with creating a computational tool for analysing the acoustic characteristics of this urban setting, which is fundamentally providing results as the sound cloud, driven from the sound ray tracing method. Regarding to this soundscape analysis method, which I developed, this computational tool assisted me to find an optimum reciprocal relation between architecture and sound. Since I have been working on soundscape in the context of architecture, urban situations, public life and public space, I was determined to produce a comprehensive research in this field and propound the hypothesis; the existence of the reciprocity between the social behaviours in public space and the sound landscape. In which extent does this reciprocity exist? What are the effects of the public life on the sonic configurations of the space and the other way around?},
  subject      = {{\"O}ffentlicher Raum},
  language  = {en}
}