@article{Eckardt,
  author    = {Eckardt, Frank},
  title     = {Kassel ohne Athen: die documenta 14 zerbricht an ihrer Ortslosigkeit},
  series = {sub/urban. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische Stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2017},
  journal   = {sub/urban. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische Stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 5, Heft 3},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3715},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20171219-37152},
  pages     = {157 -- 166},
  abstract  = {Dieser Artikel analysiert, in welcher Weise sich die Weltkunstausstellung documenta 14 mit dem {\"o}ffentlichen Raum in Kassel auseinandersetzte. Als Kritik an globalen Unrechtszust{\"a}nden konzipiert, ging die diesj{\"a}hrige Documenta nicht auf die lokalen Umst{\"a}nde in Kassel ein und benutzte die Stadt stattdessen als B{\"u}hne. Statt sich mit den konkreten Prozessen vor Ort auseinanderzusetzen, wie die Ausstellung dies in Athen getan hat, wird die Tradition der Documenta gebrochen, einen Beitrag zur gesellschaftlichen Stadtentwicklung leisten zu wollen.},
  subject      = {Kassel / Documenta},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BrokowLogaKrueger,
  author    = {Brokow-Loga, Anton and Kr{\"u}ger, Timmo},
  title     = {Potentials of Climate Emergency Declarations for degrowth transformations. The ambivalent stance of German municipalities in conflicts over a post-fossil future},
  series = {Raumforschung und Raumordnung},
  volume    = {2023},
  journal   = {Raumforschung und Raumordnung},
  number    = {Vol. 81, No. 5},
  publisher = {oekom Verlag},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  doi       = {10.14512/rur.1666},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20231204-64984},
  pages     = {523 -- 537},
  abstract  = {This paper addresses the scope for action by municipalities in a climate emergency and places it in the framework of ecomodern (urban) policy. We analyse the way in which two German 'climate emergency municipalities' translate conflicts of post-fossil transformation into concrete political and planning strategies. Although more than 2,200 authorities around the world have already declared a climate emergency, research on the impact of these resolutions on the political orientation of municipalities is very limited. Our research focus is on the (potentially agonistic) treatment of conflicts in planning. We argue that in times of a socio-ecological crisis, success in conflict resolution cannot refer to appeasement and depoliticisation. Instead, we propose a framework of five criteria, based on critical theory on ecomodern strategies, planning processes and degrowth. Thus, this practice-related and explorative paper connects empirical insights from the German cities of Constance and Berlin with an innovative normative framework. The findings tell a complex story of an, at least partial, admission of the failure of previous climate mitigation strategies, a lack of social institutions of limits, an instrumental relation to nature and a disregard for social injustices. The paper discusses how municipalities, in the context of ongoing tensions over the post-fossil transformation in Germany, on the one hand hold on to business-as-usual approaches, but on the other hand also set political impulses for change.},
  subject      = {Stadtentwicklung},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WernerHaaseRenneretal.,
  author    = {Werner, Franziska and Haase, Annegret and Renner, Nona and Rink, Dieter and Rottwinkel, Malena and Schmidt, Anika},
  title     = {The Local Governance of Arrival in Leipzig: Housing of Asylum-Seeking Persons as a Contested Field},
  series = {Urban Planning},
  journal   = {Urban Planning},
  number    = {Volume 3, Issue 4},
  editor    = {Eckardt, Frank},
  publisher = {Cogitatio Press},
  doi       = {10.17645/up.v3i4.1708},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190122-38460},
  pages     = {116 -- 128},
  abstract  = {The article examines how the German city of Leipzig governs the housing of asylum seekers. Leipzig was a frontrunner in organizing the decentralized accommodation of asylum seekers when adopting its accommodation concept in 2012. This concept aimed at integrating asylum-seeking persons in the regular housing market at an early stage of arrival. However, since then, the city of Leipzig faces more and more challenges in implementing the concept. This is particularly due to the increasingly tight situation on the housing market while the number of people seeking protection increased and partly due to discriminating and xenophobic attitudes on the side of house owners and managers. Therefore, we argue that the so-called refugee crisis of 2015-2016 has to be seen in close interaction with a growing general housing shortage in Leipzig like in many other large European cities. Furthermore, we understand the municipal governing of housing as a contested field regarding its entanglement of diverse federal levels and policy scales, the diversity of stakeholders involved, and its dynamic change over the last years. We analyze this contested field set against the current context of arrival and dynamic urban growth on a local level. Based on empirical qualitative research that was conducted by us in 2016, Leipzig's local specifics will be investigated under the umbrella of our conceptual framework of Governance of Arrival. The issues of a strained housing market and the integration of asylum seekers in it do not apply only to Leipzig, but shed light on similar developments in other European Cities.},
  subject      = {Stadtplanung},
  language  = {en}
}