@article{Metzner,
  author    = {Metzner, Steffen},
  title     = {Regional Influences on Yields of Logistics Properties},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3181},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170516-31817},
  pages     = {1 -- 14},
  abstract  = {By allocating real estate investments into the logistics sector, investors highly participate in the economic development of the respective country or city. However, the submarket is very cyclical and special economic influences - such as growing online trade and new logistic networks - affect the performance of the properties. Important parameters on the potential returns are found not only within the real estate market, but also within the global economy and the development of specific industries. This paper aims at examining factors affecting the performance of logistics properties. Expected dependencies between macroeconomic factors and real estate economic indicators are examined for six major European logistics locations using econometric models, especially correlation and regression. Data series over a period of 25 years were used. The construction of an econometric model was an iterative process integrating both the statistical result and the economic causality.},
  subject      = {Grundst{\"u}ck},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Assmann,
  author    = {Assmann, Aleida},
  title     = {Welche Zuk{\"u}nfte?},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3613},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20171130-36136},
  abstract  = {Vortrag, gehalten am 20.04.2017 zur Einf{\"u}hrung von Prof. Dr. Winfried Speitkamp in das Amt des Pr{\"a}sidenten der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  subject      = {Fortschritt},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KraazKoopWunschetal.,
  author    = {Kraaz, Luise and Koop, Maria and Wunsch, Maximilian and Plank-Wiedenbeck, Uwe},
  title     = {The Scaling Potential of Experimental Knowledge in the Case of the Bauhaus.MobilityLab, Erfurt (Germany)},
  series = {Urban Planning},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Urban Planning},
  number    = {Volume 7, Issue 3},
  doi       = {10.17645/up.v7i3.5329},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230509-63633},
  pages     = {274 -- 284},
  abstract  = {Real-world labs hold the potential to catalyse rapid urban transformations through real-world experimentation. Characterised by a rather radical, responsive, and location-specific nature, real-world labs face constraints in the scaling of experimental knowledge. To make a significant contribution to urban transformation, the produced knowledge must go beyond the level of a building, street, or small district where real-world experiments are conducted. Thus, a conflict arises between experimental boundaries and the stimulation of broader implications. The challenges of scaling experimental knowledge have been recognised as a problem, but remain largely unexplained. Based on this, the article will discuss the applicability of the "typology of amplification processes" by Lam et al. (2020) to explore and evaluate the potential of scaling experimental knowledge from real-world labs. The application of the typology is exemplified in the case of the Bauhaus.MobilityLab. The Bauhaus.MobilityLab takes a unique approach by testing and developing cross-sectoral mobility, energy, and logistics solutions with a distinct focus on scaling knowledge and innovation. For this case study, different qualitative research techniques are combined according to "within-method triangulation" and synthesised in a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. The analysis of the Bauhaus.MobilityLab proves that the "typology of amplification processes" is useful as a systematic approach to identifying and evaluating the potential of scaling experimental knowledge.},
  subject      = {Stadtplanung},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WelchGuerra,
  author    = {Welch Guerra, Max},
  title     = {Fach, Gesellschaft und Wissenschaft. Beitrag zur Debatte „Was ist Stadt? Was ist Kritik?"},
  series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 10, Nr. 1},
  publisher = {Sub\urban e.V.},
  address   = {Leipzig},
  doi       = {10.36900/suburban.v10i1.779},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220810-46855},
  pages     = {188 -- 190},
  abstract  = {Der Aufruf, die Begriffe Stadt und Kritik in das Zentrum einer Debatte zu stellen, bietet die große Chance, uns weit {\"u}ber begriffliche Kl{\"a}rungen unseres gemeinsamen Arbeitsgegenstands hinaus - die ja auch f{\"u}r sich selbst sehr fruchtbar sein k{\"o}nnen - {\"u}ber die Funktion zu verst{\"a}ndigen, die wir in der Gesellschaft aus{\"u}ben, wenn wir r{\"a}umliche Planung praktizieren, erforschen und lehren. Da in der Bundesrepublik nicht nur ein großer Bedarf, sondern auch eine betr{\"a}chtliche Nachfrage nach {\"o}ffentlicher Planung besteht und die planungsbezogenen Wissenschaften sich eines insgesamt stabilen institutionellen Standes erfreuen, laufen wir Gefahr, die gesellschaftspolitische Legitimation von Berufsfeld und Wissenschaft zu vernachl{\"a}ssigen, sie als gegeben zu behandeln. Wir m{\"u}ssen uns ja kaum rechtfertigen.},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RoskammVollmer,
  author    = {Roskamm, Nikolai and Vollmer, Lisa},
  title     = {Was ist Stadt? Was ist Kritik? Einf{\"u}hrung in die Debatte zum Jubil{\"a}umsheft von sub\urban},
  series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  journal   = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 10, Nr. 1,},
  publisher = {Sub\urban e.V.},
  address   = {Leipzig},
  doi       = {10.36900/suburban.v10i1.798},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220811-46847},
  pages     = {127 -- 130},
  abstract  = {Im Heft zum zehnj{\"a}hrigen Jubil{\"a}um von sub\urban mit dem Themenschwerpunkt „sub\x: Verortungen, Entortungen" ver{\"o}ffentlichen wir eine Debatte, die von den bisherigen in unserer Zeitschrift in dieser Rubrik gef{\"u}hrten textlichen Diskussionen abweicht. Im Vorfeld der Planungen f{\"u}r unsere Jubil{\"a}umsausgabe haben wir die aktuellen Mitglieder unseres wissenschaftlichen Beirats darum gebeten, zwei grundlegende Fragen von kritischer Stadtforschung in kurzen Beitr{\"a}gen zu diskutieren: Was ist Stadt? Was ist Kritik?},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BockGoesVollmer,
  author    = {Bock, Violetta and Goes, Thomas and Vollmer, Lisa},
  title     = {Elitenkritik, populare B{\"u}ndnisse und inklusive Solidarit{\"a}r. Interview zur Debatte um Linkspopulismus},
  series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2018},
  journal   = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 6, Heft 1},
  issn      = {2197-2567},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3758},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20180710-37582},
  pages     = {119 -- 128},
  abstract  = {In der aktuellen {\"o}konomischen und politischen Krise haben Debatten um linke Strategien wieder Hochkonjunktur. Besonders kontrovers werden Vorschl{\"a}ge diskutiert, die einen Linkspopulismus als Alternative zum rechten politischen Projekt, zum Neoliberalismus und als Transformationsstrategie hin zu einer sozialistischen Gesellschaft propagieren. Thomas Goes und Violetta Bock haben mit ihrem Buch Ein unanst{\"a}ndiges Angebot? Mit linkem Populismus gegen Eliten und Rechte (2017) eine programmatische Aufarbeitung existierender linker Populismuskonzepte und ihre eigene Vorstellung davon, wie ein linker Populismus gelingen kann, vorgelegt. Damit haben sie die Debatte um Linkspopulismus in Deutschland befeuert. Im Interview werden sie nach ihren Positionen und den Kontroversen um das Buch befragt. Das Interview soll als Aufschlag f{\"u}r eine Debatte dienen. Antworten zu den dargestellten Positionen und Bez{\"u}ge zu st{\"a}dtischen Themen und st{\"a}dtischen sozialen Bewegungen sind sehr willkommen.},
  subject      = {Populismus},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Vollmer,
  author    = {Vollmer, Lisa},
  title     = {Keine Angst vor Alternativen. Ein neuer Munizipalismus},
  series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2017},
  journal   = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 5, Heft 3},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3712},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20171130-37124},
  pages     = {147 -- 156},
  abstract  = {Die Idee eines neuen Munizipalismus wird in den linken sozialen Bewegungen Europas und dar{\"u}ber hinaus breit diskutiert. Munizipalistische Bewegungen streben es an, kommunale Regierungen zu {\"u}bernehmen oder zu beeinflussen, um lokale Institutionen (wieder) gemeinwohlorientiert auszurichten, ein neues Verh{\"a}ltnis zwischen kommunalen Regierungen und sozialen Bewegungen zu schaffen und so die Art wie Politik gestaltet wird von unten her zu demokratisieren und institutionelle Rahmenbedingungen zu ver{\"a}ndern. Sie entstehen in Reaktion auf die aktuelle {\"o}konomische und politische Krise - ebenso wie neue rechte und rechtspopulistische Bewegungen, als deren Gegenpart sie sich verstehen. Mit Mut und konkreten Utopien will man der multiplen st{\"a}dtischen Krise begegnen, statt mit Angst und Angstmacherei wie rechte Bewegungen. Deshalb trafen sich im Juni 2017 {\"u}ber 600 Vertreter_innen dieser munizipalistischen Bewegungen auf Einladung Barcelona en Com{\´u}s.},
  subject      = {Stadtforschung},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Eckardt,
  author    = {Eckardt, Frank},
  title     = {Kassel ohne Athen: die documenta 14 zerbricht an ihrer Ortslosigkeit},
  series = {sub/urban. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische Stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2017},
  journal   = {sub/urban. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische Stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 5, Heft 3},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3715},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20171219-37152},
  pages     = {157 -- 166},
  abstract  = {Dieser Artikel analysiert, in welcher Weise sich die Weltkunstausstellung documenta 14 mit dem {\"o}ffentlichen Raum in Kassel auseinandersetzte. Als Kritik an globalen Unrechtszust{\"a}nden konzipiert, ging die diesj{\"a}hrige Documenta nicht auf die lokalen Umst{\"a}nde in Kassel ein und benutzte die Stadt stattdessen als B{\"u}hne. Statt sich mit den konkreten Prozessen vor Ort auseinanderzusetzen, wie die Ausstellung dies in Athen getan hat, wird die Tradition der Documenta gebrochen, einen Beitrag zur gesellschaftlichen Stadtentwicklung leisten zu wollen.},
  subject      = {Kassel / Documenta},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BrokowLogaKrueger,
  author    = {Brokow-Loga, Anton and Kr{\"u}ger, Timmo},
  title     = {Potentials of Climate Emergency Declarations for degrowth transformations. The ambivalent stance of German municipalities in conflicts over a post-fossil future},
  series = {Raumforschung und Raumordnung},
  volume    = {2023},
  journal   = {Raumforschung und Raumordnung},
  number    = {Vol. 81, No. 5},
  publisher = {oekom Verlag},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  doi       = {10.14512/rur.1666},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20231204-64984},
  pages     = {523 -- 537},
  abstract  = {This paper addresses the scope for action by municipalities in a climate emergency and places it in the framework of ecomodern (urban) policy. We analyse the way in which two German 'climate emergency municipalities' translate conflicts of post-fossil transformation into concrete political and planning strategies. Although more than 2,200 authorities around the world have already declared a climate emergency, research on the impact of these resolutions on the political orientation of municipalities is very limited. Our research focus is on the (potentially agonistic) treatment of conflicts in planning. We argue that in times of a socio-ecological crisis, success in conflict resolution cannot refer to appeasement and depoliticisation. Instead, we propose a framework of five criteria, based on critical theory on ecomodern strategies, planning processes and degrowth. Thus, this practice-related and explorative paper connects empirical insights from the German cities of Constance and Berlin with an innovative normative framework. The findings tell a complex story of an, at least partial, admission of the failure of previous climate mitigation strategies, a lack of social institutions of limits, an instrumental relation to nature and a disregard for social injustices. The paper discusses how municipalities, in the context of ongoing tensions over the post-fossil transformation in Germany, on the one hand hold on to business-as-usual approaches, but on the other hand also set political impulses for change.},
  subject      = {Stadtentwicklung},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WernerHaaseRenneretal.,
  author    = {Werner, Franziska and Haase, Annegret and Renner, Nona and Rink, Dieter and Rottwinkel, Malena and Schmidt, Anika},
  title     = {The Local Governance of Arrival in Leipzig: Housing of Asylum-Seeking Persons as a Contested Field},
  series = {Urban Planning},
  journal   = {Urban Planning},
  number    = {Volume 3, Issue 4},
  editor    = {Eckardt, Frank},
  publisher = {Cogitatio Press},
  doi       = {10.17645/up.v3i4.1708},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190122-38460},
  pages     = {116 -- 128},
  abstract  = {The article examines how the German city of Leipzig governs the housing of asylum seekers. Leipzig was a frontrunner in organizing the decentralized accommodation of asylum seekers when adopting its accommodation concept in 2012. This concept aimed at integrating asylum-seeking persons in the regular housing market at an early stage of arrival. However, since then, the city of Leipzig faces more and more challenges in implementing the concept. This is particularly due to the increasingly tight situation on the housing market while the number of people seeking protection increased and partly due to discriminating and xenophobic attitudes on the side of house owners and managers. Therefore, we argue that the so-called refugee crisis of 2015-2016 has to be seen in close interaction with a growing general housing shortage in Leipzig like in many other large European cities. Furthermore, we understand the municipal governing of housing as a contested field regarding its entanglement of diverse federal levels and policy scales, the diversity of stakeholders involved, and its dynamic change over the last years. We analyze this contested field set against the current context of arrival and dynamic urban growth on a local level. Based on empirical qualitative research that was conducted by us in 2016, Leipzig's local specifics will be investigated under the umbrella of our conceptual framework of Governance of Arrival. The issues of a strained housing market and the integration of asylum seekers in it do not apply only to Leipzig, but shed light on similar developments in other European Cities.},
  subject      = {Stadtplanung},
  language  = {en}
}