@misc{MendoncadeAlmeida, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Mendon{\c{c}}a de Almeida, Karina}, title = {Why isn't Google welcome in Kreuzberg? Social movement and the effects of Internet on urban space}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4244}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200924-42446}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {132}, abstract = {Advances in information and communication technologies such as the Internet have driven a great transformation in the interactions between individuals and the urban environment. As the use of the Internet in cities becomes more intense and diverse, there is also a restructuring of urban space, which is experienced by groups in society in various ways, according to the specificity of each context. Accordingly, large Internet companies have emerged as new players in the processes of urbanization, either through partnerships with the public administration or through various services offered directly to urban residents. Once these corporations are key actors in the digitalization of urban services, their operations can affect the patterns of urban inequality and generate a series of new struggles over the production of space. Interested in analyzing this phenomena from the perspective of civil society, the present Master Thesis examined a social movement that prevented Google to settle a new startup campus in the district of Kreuzberg, in Berlin. By asking why Google was not welcome in that context, this study also sought to understand how internet, as well as its main operators, has affected everyday life in the city. Thus, besides analyzing the movement, I investigated the particularities of the urban context where it arose and the elements that distinguish the mobilization's opponent. In pursuit of an interdisciplinary approach, I analyzed and discussed the results of empirical research in dialogue with critical theories in the fields of urban studies and the Internet, with emphasis on Castells' definitions of urban social movements and network society (1983, 2009, 2015), Couldry's and Mejias' (2019) idea of data colonialism, Lef{\`e}bvre's (1991, 1996) concepts of abstract space and the right to the city, as well as Zuboff's (2019) theory of surveillance capitalism. The case at hand has exposed that Google plays a prominent role in the way the Internet has been developed and deployed in cities. From the perspective accessed, the current appropriation of Internet technologies has been detrimental to individual autonomy and has contributed to intensifying existing inequalities in the city. The alternative vision to this relies mainly on the promotion of decentralized solidarity networks.}, subject = {Soziale Bewegung}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Sung, author = {Sung, Younkyoung}, title = {Cultural Tourism and Social Resilience: Discourse of Historic Cities in East Germany, the Case of Gotha and Eisenach}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4092}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200212-40920}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {This thesis explores how cultural heritage plays a role in the development of urban identity by engaging both actively and passively with memory, i.e. remembering and forgetting. I argue that architectural heritage is a medium where specific cultural and social decisions form its way of presentation, and it reflects the values and interests of the period. By the process of remembering and forgetting, the meanings between inhabitant and object in urban environment are practiced, and the meanings are created. To enable the research in narrative observation, cultural tourism management is chosen as the main research object, which reflects the alteration of interaction between the architectural heritage and urban identity. Identifying the role of heritage management, the definition of social resilience and the prospects of cultural heritage as a means of social resilience are addressed. Case region of the research is East Ger- many, thereby, the study examines the distinct approaches and objectives regarding heritage management under the different political systems along the German reunification process. The framework is based on various theoretical paradigms to investigate the broad research questions: 1) What is the role of historic urban quarters in the revitalisation of East German towns? 2) How was the transition processed by cultural heritage management? 3) How did policy affect residents' lives? The case study is applied to macro level (city level: Gotha and Eisenach) and micro level study (object level: specific heritage sites), to analyse the performance of selective remembering and making tourist destination through giving significance to specific heritage. By means of site observations, archival research, qualitative inter- views, photographs, and discourse analysis on printed tourism materials, the study demonstrates that certain sites and characteristics of the city enable creating and focusing messages, which aids the social resilience. Combining theory and empirical studies this thesis attempts to widen the academic discussion regarding the practice of remembering and forgetting driven by cultural heritage. The thesis argues for cultural heritage tourism as an element of social resilience and one that embraces the historic and cultural identity of the inhabitants.}, subject = {Stadtmarketing}, language = {en} } @misc{Vollmer, author = {Vollmer, Lisa}, title = {Aber das sind doch die Guten - oder? Wohnungsgenossenschaften in Hamburg. Rezension zu Jo-scha Metzger (2021): Genossenschaften und die Wohnungsfrage. Konflikte im Feld der Sozialen Wohnungswirtschaft. M{\"u}nster: Westf{\"a}lisches Dampfboot}, series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung}, volume = {2022}, journal = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung}, number = {Band 10, Nr. 1}, publisher = {sub\urban e. V.}, address = {Berlin}, doi = {10.36900/suburban.v10i1.795}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220713-46691}, pages = {261 -- 267}, abstract = {Warum werden in aktuellen Diskussionen Wohnungsgenossenschaften immer wieder als zentrale Akteure einer gemeinwohlorientierten Wohnraumversorgung benannt - obwohl sie kaum zur Schaffung neuen bezahlbaren Wohnraums beitragen? Warum wehrt sich die Mehrzahl der Wohnungsgenossenschaften mit H{\"a}nden und F{\"u}ßen gegen die Wiedereinf{\"u}hrung eines Gesetzes zur Wohnungsgemeinn{\"u}tzigkeit, obwohl es doch gerade dieses Gesetz war, dass sie im 20. Jahrhundert zu im internationalen Vergleich großen Unternehmen wachsen ließ? Sind Wohnungsgenossenschaften nun klientilistische, wenig demokratische und nur halb dekommodifizierte Marktteilnehmer oder wichtiger Teil der Wohnungsversorgung der unteren Mittelschicht? Wer Antworten auf diese und andere Fragen sucht und Differenziertheit in ihrer Beantwortung aush{\"a}lt, lese Joscha Metzers Dissertation „Genossenschaften und die Wohnungsfrage.}, subject = {Gentrifizierung}, language = {de} } @misc{KleineCalbetiElias, author = {Kleine, Aya and Calbet i Elias, Laura}, title = {Gemeinwohlorientierte Bodennutzung in Kooperation. Ein Handlungsleitfaden f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentlich-zivielgesellschaftliche Partnerschaften}, editor = {Calbet i Elias, Laura and Vollmer, Lisa and Kleine, Aya}, edition = {Erste Auflage}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.6398}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230609-63988}, pages = {56}, abstract = {Dieser Handlungsleitfaden m{\"o}chte die gemeinwohlorientierte Vergabe von R{\"a}umen und Fl{\"a}chen an zivilgesellschaftliche Gruppen st{\"a}rken. Er ist als Inspirationssammlung zu verstehen, die den Weg zu neuen Kooperationen zwischen {\"o}ffentlichen und zivilgesellschaftlichen Akteuren erleichtern soll. Wissenswertesund inspirierende Beispiele bieten eine Starthilfe, um nicht nur einzelne stadtr{\"a}umliche Experimente zu wagen, sondern die gemeinwohlorientierte Fl{\"a}chen- und Raumvergabe an zivilgesellschaftliche Gruppen kommunal zu verankern. Denn {\"o}ffentliche Liegenschaften sind nach vielen Jahren der Privatisierung eine rare Ressource, die umso mehr dem Gemeinwohl dienen sollte.}, subject = {Liegenschaftspolitik}, language = {de} } @misc{Pessoa, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Pessoa, Suelen}, title = {Why do the Archives archive? A journey from the hunko to the counter-ethnography and back}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4328}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210112-43280}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {A complex artistic research on the theme of cultural heritage and (neo)colonial processes of material and immaterial expropriation. Starting from the encounter with a phonographic relic at the Berliner Phonogramm-Archiv, the artist embarks on a journey to her own roots embodied in the practice of the Afro-Brazilian religion Candombl{\´e}. In the form of a theoretical treatise, an archive (photos, diagrams, maps, newspaper clippings, letters, documents), as well as a sound performance in the public space of the city of Weimar, several theoretical and performative elements are brought together in this transmedia artistic research that proposes a true decolonial practice.}, subject = {K{\"u}nstlerische Forschung}, language = {en} } @incollection{BerndtBogojević, author = {Berndt, Arpana Aischa and Bogojević, Maja}, title = {How to be an ally? Gespr{\"a}ch {\"u}ber ein Format f{\"u}r rasssimuskritische Lehre und aktiven Support}, series = {Experimente lernen, techniken tauschen. Ein spekulatives Handbuch}, booktitle = {Experimente lernen, techniken tauschen. Ein spekulatives Handbuch}, publisher = {Nocturne}, address = {Berlin/Weimar}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4267}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201008-42679}, publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {291 -- 311}, abstract = {Gespr{\"a}ch {\"u}ber die intersektionalen Workshops von Arpana Berndt und Maja Bogojević, antirassistische Arbeit an der Hochschule und Allyship.}, subject = {Antirassismus}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Camerin, author = {Camerin, Federico}, title = {THE ROLE OF THE GREAT PROPERTY IN THE EUROPEAN CITY-MAKING PROCESS IN THE LAST THIRD OF THE 20th CENTURY. MILITARY PROPERTY AS REFERENCE}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4201}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200714-42018}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {453}, abstract = {The thesis concerns a work of urban history intended not to describe the city but rather to interpret it. By doing so, I have interpreted the city by means of the role played by the so-called 'great property' in the European city-making process during the last three decades of the 20th century, specifically focused on the concrete case of military properties in Italy. I have also considered the role played by other kinds of great properties, i.e. industries and railway, which previously acted in the production of the built environment in a different way respect to the military one. As all of them have as common denominator the fact of being 'capital in land', I analysed great industrial and railway properties in order to extrapolate a methodology which helped me to interpret the relationship between military properties and city-making process in Europe in the late 20th century. I have analysed the relationship between the capital in land and the city-making process on the ground of the understanding the interrelation between the great property, the urban development, and the agents involved in the urban and territorial planning. Here I have showed that urban planning is not the decisive factor influencing the citymaking process, but instead the power held by the capital in land. I have found that is the great property the trigger of the creation of new 'areas of centrality' intended as large areas for consumerism. As far as the role played by great property is concerned, I have also discovered that it has evolved over time. Originally, industrial and railway properties have been regenerated into a wide range of new profit-driven spaces; successively, I have found out that most of the regeneration of military premises aimed to materialise areas of centrality. The way of interpreting this factor has been based on focusing my attention on the military premises in Italy: I have classified their typology when they have been built and, most importantly, when they have been regenerated into new areas of centrality.}, subject = {Stadtplanung}, language = {en} } @periodical{BeeKlemsteinHallmannetal., author = {Bee, Julia and Klemstein, Franziska and Hallmann, Lilli and Noeske, Jannik and Bachrach Barzilai, Yael and Bauche, Manuela and Beck, Erik and Logemann, Daniel and Marshall, Danna and Paulus, J{\"o}rg and Schl{\"u}ter, Dorothee and Schubert-Lehnhardt, Viola and Schwoch, Rebecca and Str{\"a}hle, Volker and Stubenvoll, Kerstin and Victor, Kristin and Wagner, Jens-Christian and Welch Guerra, Max}, title = {Auf dem Weg zum Erinnerungsort - das Geb{\"a}ude der NS-Medizinb{\"u}rokratie in Weimar}, editor = {Bee, Julia and Hallmann, Lilli and Klemstein, Franziska and Noeske, Jannik}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.6461}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20231012-64617}, abstract = {Die Bauhausstraße 11 war in der NS-Zeit Sitz von zahlreichen Institutionen der Gesundheitspolitik. Jetzt ist das Geb{\"a}ude zum Gegenstand eines Forschungsprojektes geworden, in Zukunft wird auch vor Ort an seine Einbindung in nationalsozialistische Verbrechen erinnert. Dieses Buch dokumentiert und reflektiert die Erinnerungsarbeit auf dem Campus der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar und dar{\"u}ber hinaus. Anhand der interdisziplin{\"a}ren Beitr{\"a}ge wird das Geb{\"a}ude in der heutigen Bauhausstraße 11 r{\"a}umlich in Weimar und Th{\"u}ringen, erinnerungspolitisch aber in einer seit Jahrzehnten erk{\"a}mpften Landschaft des Gedenkens an nationalsozialistische Verbrechen verortet.}, subject = {Kollektives Ged{\"a}chtnis}, language = {de} } @misc{Vittu, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Vittu, Elodie}, title = {Die Gestaltung eines Platzes in dem Sanierungs- und Quartiersmanagementgebiet Helmholtzplatz: „ein Platz f{\"u}r alle"? : Kritische Betrachtung gegens{\"a}tzlicher Positionen zur behutsamen Stadterneuerung am Prenzlauer Berg, Bilanz}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1956}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20130622-19565}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {Die Kurzfassung ist auf deutsch und die ganze Arbeit + Anh{\"a}nge auf franz{\"o}sisch. AUSGANGSPUNKT Die Spannung zwischen Sanierung und sozialem Wandel Nach dem Wegzug der mittleren Schichten aus den Innenst{\"a}dten gibt es seit mehr als 50 Jahren ein {\"o}ffentliches Bestreben, europ{\"a}ische St{\"a}dte zu sanieren. Damit soll die Attraktivit{\"a}t dieser Stadtteile gesteigert sowie Investitionen gef{\"o}rdert werden. In mehreren wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten und empirischen Untersuchungen {\"u}ber die Ergebnisse dieser Sanierungspolitik haben Forscher vor den negativen Effekten f{\"u}r die Anwohner gewarnt und den Begriff der „Gentrifizierung" eingef{\"u}hrt. Die Aufwertung der Innenst{\"a}dte sei mit einem sozialen Umstrukturierungsprozess durch den wachsenden Druck am Wohnungsmarkt und eine kontinuierliche Mietpreiserh{\"o}hung verbunden. FRAGESTELLUNG Die Sanierungsprojekte, die in den 80er-Jahren im Rahmen der I.B.A. entwickelt wurden, sind international als „good practice" bezeichnet worden. Die zw{\"o}lf Leits{\"a}tze der „behutsamen Stadterneuerung" sind das Vorzeigekind der deutschen Sanierungspraxis. Diese Erfahrungen wurden nach dem Fall der Mauer auf die Situation im Prenzlauer Berg {\"u}bertragen. Die vorliegende Arbeit (in franz{\"o}sischer Sprache) ist der Frage nachgegangen, inwiefern die behutsame Stadterneuerung in Berlin Prenzlauer Berg als Modell st{\"a}dtebaulicher Politik im Altbaugebiet dienen kann? „Modell" ist dabei nicht als Reproduktionsmodell, sondern im Sinne von „Vorbild" gemeint. ...}, subject = {Stadt / Planung}, language = {de} } @misc{Genc, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Genc, Emir}, title = {Decoding Public Life in Urban Soundscape: The Case of Weimar}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2743}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170213-27438}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {INTRODUCTION The research field of sound landscape and public life, initially drew my attention during the master class of 'Media of the Urban', originally 'Medien des Urbanen, which was given by Prof. Dr. Gabriele Schabacher in the 2015 summer semester. For the relevant class, I conducted an conceptual case study in Istanbul, Beyoglu District, with the intention of analysing the perception of the space by urban sound. During the summer 2015 I recorded various sounds of different spatial settings and developed the analysis by comparing the situations. By that time, I realized the inherent property of the sound as a medium for our perception in urban context. In the 2015-2016 winter semester, I participated in the master class of the architectural project, named 'Build Allegory', which was given by Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Heike B{\"u}ttner. The project was situated in Berlin Westkreuz, AVUS north curve, on the highway and was originally a race track from 1921. In this context, the aim of my project was to answer various questions, main of which was, how does the architectural form shape the sound of the place? And, how does the sound of the place shape the architectural from? Since the place is still serving mainly to the vehicles, although the function has differed, the sound objects and the context have remained. Through the existence of contextual references, I started with creating a computational tool for analysing the acoustic characteristics of this urban setting, which is fundamentally providing results as the sound cloud, driven from the sound ray tracing method. Regarding to this soundscape analysis method, which I developed, this computational tool assisted me to find an optimum reciprocal relation between architecture and sound. Since I have been working on soundscape in the context of architecture, urban situations, public life and public space, I was determined to produce a comprehensive research in this field and propound the hypothesis; the existence of the reciprocity between the social behaviours in public space and the sound landscape. In which extent does this reciprocity exist? What are the effects of the public life on the sonic configurations of the space and the other way around?}, subject = {{\"O}ffentlicher Raum}, language = {en} }