@article{Stadler,
  author    = {Stadler, Max},
  title     = {Gr{\"u}nderzeit. Hightech und Alternativen der Wissenschaft in West-Berlin},
  series = {NTM Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {NTM Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin},
  number    = {30 (2022)},
  publisher = {Basel},
  address   = {Birkh{\"a}user},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00048-022-00352-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230124-48800},
  pages     = {599 -- 632},
  abstract  = {Zu den diversen Unternehmungen sozialbewegter „Gegenwissenschaft", die um 1980 auf der Bildfl{\"a}che der BRD erschienen, z{\"a}hlte der 1982 gegr{\"u}ndete Berliner Wissenschaftsladen e. V., kurz WILAB - eine Art „alternatives" Spin-off der Technischen Universit{\"a}t Berlin. Der vorliegende Beitrag situiert die Ausgr{\"u}ndung des „Ladens" im Kontext zeitgen{\"o}ssischer Fortschritte der (regionalen) Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Gezeigt wird, wie der deindustrialisierenden Inselstadt, qua „innovationspolitischer" Gegensteuerung, dabei sogar eine gewisse Vorreiterrolle zukam: {\"u}ber die Stadtgrenzen hinaus sichtbare Neuerungen wie die Gr{\"u}ndermesse BIG TECH oder das 1983 er{\"o}ffnete Berliner Innovations- und Gr{\"u}nderzentrum (BIG), der erste „Incubator" [sic] der BRD, etwa gingen auf das Konto der 1977/78 lancierten Technologie-Transferstelle der TU Berlin, TU-transfer. Anders gesagt: tendenziell bekam man es hier nun mit Verh{\"a}ltnissen zu tun, die immer weniger mit den Tr{\"a}umen einer „kritischen", nicht-fremdbestimmten (Gegen‑)Wissenschaft kompatibel waren. Latent kontr{\"a}r zur historiographischen Prominenz des wissenschaftskritischen Zeitgeists fristeten „alternativen" Zielsetzungen verpflichtete Unternehmungen wie „WILAB" ein relativ marginalisiertes Nischendasein. Dennoch wirft das am WILAB verfolgte, so gesehen wenig aussichtsreiche Anliegen, eine andere, n{\"a}mlich „humanere" Informationstechnologie in die Wege zu leiten, ein instruktives Licht auf die Aufbr{\"u}che „unternehmerischer" Wissenschaft in der BRD um 1980.},
  subject      = {Berlin <West>},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{HijaziHusseinKoenig,
  author    = {Hijazi, Ihab Hamzi and Hussein, M. H. and K{\"o}nig, Reinhard},
  title     = {Enabling geo-design: Evaluating the capacity of 3D city model to support thermal design in building},
  series = {9th 3DGeoInfo Conference},
  booktitle = {9th 3DGeoInfo Conference},
  address   = {Dubai, UAE},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2508},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20160118-25089},
  pages     = {4},
  abstract  = {Enabling geo-design: Evaluating the capacity of 3D city model to support thermal design in building},
  subject      = {Informatik},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KoenigKnecht,
  author    = {K{\"o}nig, Reinhard and Knecht, Katja},
  title     = {Comparing two evolutionary algorithm based methods for layout generation: Dense packing versus subdivision},
  series = {Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing},
  journal   = {Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing},
  pages     = {285 -- 299},
  abstract  = {We present and compare two evolutionary algorithm based methods for rectangular architectural layout generation: dense packing and subdivision algorithms.We analyze the characteristics of the two methods on the basis of three floor plan sce- narios. Our analyses include the speed with which solutions are generated, the reliability with which optimal solutions can be found, and the number of different solutions that can be found overall. In a following step, we discuss the methods with respect to their different user interaction capabilities. In addition, we show that each method has the capability to generate more complex L-shaped layouts. Finally,we conclude that neither of the methods is superior but that each of them is suitable for use in distinct application scenarios because of its different properties.},
  subject      = {Architektur},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{TreyerKleinKoenigetal.,
  author    = {Treyer, Lukas and Klein, Bernhard and K{\"o}nig, Reinhard and Meixner, Christine},
  title     = {Lightweight urban computation interchange (LUCI) system},
  series = {FOSS4G 2015 Conference},
  booktitle = {FOSS4G 2015 Conference},
  publisher = {FOSS4G},
  address   = {Seoul, South Korea},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2504},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20160118-25042},
  pages     = {12},
  abstract  = {In this paper we introduce LUCI, a Lightweight Urban Calculation Interchange system, designed to bring the advantages of a calculation and content co-ordination system to small planning and design groups by the means of an open source middle-ware. The middle-ware focuses on problems typical to urban planning and therefore features a geo-data repository as well as a job runtime administration, to coordinate simulation models and its multiple views. The described system architecture is accompanied by two exemplary use cases that have been used to test and further develop our concepts and implementations.},
  subject      = {Architektur},
  language  = {en}
}