@article{MotraHildebrandDimmigOsburg,
  author    = {Motra, Hem Bahadur and Hildebrand, J{\"o}rg and Dimmig-Osburg, Andrea},
  title     = {Assessment of strain measurement techniques to characterise mechanical properties of structural steel},
  series = {Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal},
  journal   = {Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jestch.2014.07.006},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170425-31540},
  pages     = {260 -- 269},
  abstract  = {Strain measurement is important in mechanical testing. A wide variety of techniques exists for measuring strain in the tensile test; namely the strain gauge, extensometer, stress and strain determined by machine crosshead motion, Geometric Moire technique, optical strain measurement techniques and others. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the strain measurement techniques. To carry out the tensile test experiments for S 235, sixty samples were cut from the web of the I-profile in longitudinal and transverse directions in four different dimensions. The geometry of samples are analysed by 3D scanner and vernier caliper. In addition, the strain values were determined by using strain gauge, extensometer and machine crosshead motion. Three techniques of strain measurement are compared in quantitative manner based on the calculation of mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity, yield strength, tensile strength, percentage elongation at maximum force) of structural steel. A statistical information was used for evaluating the results. It is seen that the extensometer and strain gauge provided reliable data, however the extensometer offers several advantages over the strain gauge and crosshead motion for testing structural steel in tension. Furthermore, estimation of measurement uncertainty is presented for the basic material parameters extracted through strain measurement.},
  subject      = {Baustahl},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Goebel,
  author    = {G{\"o}bel, Luise},
  title     = {Experimental and semi-analytical multiscale approaches for the characterization of the elastic and viscoelastic behavior of polymer-modified cement-based materials},
  publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag},
  address   = {Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-95773-269-9},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3827},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20181211-38279},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {259},
  abstract  = {Polymer-modified cement concrete (PCC) is a heterogeneous building material with a hierarchically organized microstructure. Therefore, continuum micromechanics-based multiscale models represent a promising method to estimate the mechanical properties. By means of a bottom-up approach, homogenized properties at the macroscopic scale are derived considering microstructural characteristics. The extension of existing multiscale models for the application to PCC is the main objective of this work. For that, cross-scale experimental studies are required. Both macroscopic and microscopic mechanical tests are performed to characterize the elastic and viscoelastic properties of different PCC. The comparison between experiment and model prediction illustrates the success of the modeling approach.},
  subject      = {Elastizit{\"a}tsmodul},
  language  = {en}
}