@article{BielikSchneiderKuligaetal., author = {Bielik, Martin and Schneider, Sven and Kuliga, Saskia and Griego, Danielle and Ojha, Varun and K{\"o}nig, Reinhard and Schmitt, Gerhard and Donath, Dirk}, title = {Examining Trade-Offs between Social, Psychological, and Energy Potential of Urban Form}, series = {ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information}, volume = {2019}, journal = {ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information}, editor = {Resch, Bernd and Szell, Michael}, doi = {10.3390/ijgi8020052}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190408-38695}, abstract = {Urban planners are often challenged with the task of developing design solutions which must meet multiple, and often contradictory, criteria. In this paper, we investigated the trade-offs between social, psychological, and energy potential of the fundamental elements of urban form: the street network and the building massing. Since formal mehods to evaluate urban form from the psychological and social point of view are not readily available, we developed a methodological framework to quantify these criteria as the first contribution in this paper. To evaluate the psychological potential, we conducted a three-tiered empirical study starting from real world environments and then abstracting them to virtual environments. In each context, the implicit (physiological) response and explicit (subjective) response of pedestrians were measured. To quantify the social potential, we developed a street network centrality-based measure of social accessibility. For the energy potential, we created an energy model to analyze the impact of pure geometric form on the energy demand of the building stock. The second contribution of this work is a method to identify distinct clusters of urban form and, for each, explore the trade-offs between the select design criteria. We applied this method to two case studies identifying nine types of urban form and their respective potential trade-offs, which are directly applicable for the assessment of strategic decisions regarding urban form during the early planning stages.}, subject = {Planung}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Lee, author = {Lee, Sunju}, title = {Die kinder- und jugendfreundliche Stadtentwicklung in Korea}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3971}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190902-39718}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {378}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Arbeit hat die Absicht, den Bedarf der Umsetzung der Planungsidee ‚kinder- und jugendfreundliche Stadtentwicklung' in Korea zu erforschen und Vorschl{\"a}ge f{\"u}r die Umsetzung zu machen. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus will sie herausfinden, warum man sich bez{\"u}glich der Durchf{\"u}hrung der kinder- und jugendfreundlichen Stadtentwicklung zun{\"a}chst auf die Schulen und deren Umgebungen konzentrieren soll. Deshalb widmet sich die Dissertation zuerst der Literaturrecherche, sowohl was den Begriff der kinder- und jugendfreundlichen Stadtentwicklung angeht als auch der Literatur bez{\"u}glich des Beitrags der Schulen zur Realisierung der kinder- und jugendfreundlichen Stadtentwicklung. Danach wird untersucht, ob das deutsche Instrument ‚Spielleitplanung' sich als Leitfaden f{\"u}r die gesamte Konzeption der koreanischen kinder- und jugendfreundlichen Stadtentwicklung eignet. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus werden Interviews mit koreanischen Experten aus Stadtplanung und Architektur, P{\"a}dagogik und {\"o}ffentlicher Verwaltung als Forschungsmethode verwendet, um in Bezug auf die kinder- jungendfreundliche Stadtentwicklung den koreanischen Zustand zu analysieren. Zuletzt werden anhand der Untersuchungsergebnisse Handlungs-empfehlungen f{\"u}r die Durchf{\"u}hrung der koreanischen kinder- und jugend-freundlichen Stadtentwicklung formuliert. Anhand dieser Forschung kann konstatiert werden, dass die kinder- und jugendfreundliche Stadtentwicklung eine wichtige Planungsidee ist, weil dadurch Stadtplanerinnen und Stadtplaner sowohl zum k{\"o}rperlichen und geistigen gesunden Aufwachsen von Kindern und Jugendlichen als auch zur Entwicklung ihrer sozialen Kompetenzen erheblich beitragen k{\"o}nnen. Vor allem soll man die koreanische kinder- und jugendfreundliche Stadtentwicklung zun{\"a}chst auf den Schulen und den schulischen Umgebungen umsetzen. Denn dadurch lassen sich vielseitige eventuelle Hindernisse bei der Durchf{\"u}hrung der kinder- und jugendfreundlichen Stadtentwicklung vermeiden. Ein weiterer Grund ist, dass die Schulen in Korea nicht nur in der Gesellschaft eine zentrale Rolle spielen, sondern auch im Rahmen der Stadtplanung. Auff{\"a}llig ist, dass die kinder- und jugendfreundliche Stadtentwicklung sowohl auf die r{\"a}umlichen Gestaltungen als auch auf die Beteiligung von Kindern und Jugendlichen in der st{\"a}dtischen Planung fokussiert ist. Allerdings werden bei der Stadtentwicklung die Kinder und Jugendliche in Korea noch nicht als wichtige Akteure angesehen. Darum soll man die Spielleitplanung in Korea einbeziehen, weil sie als Leitbild bei einer Konzeption der koreanischen kinder- und jugendlichen Stadtentwicklung fungieren kann. Jedoch m{\"u}ssen dabei die kulturellen Unterschiede zwischen Deutschland und Korea ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden. Weiterhin wurde durch die Interviews festgestellt, dass das Interesse und der Wille von Experten aus der Stadtplanung an Kinder- und Jugendfreundlichkeit die wichtigsten Voraussetzungen sind, um die kinder- und jugendfreundliche Stadtentwicklung in Korea zu verankern und zu verbreiten.}, subject = {Stadtentwicklung}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Chen, author = {Chen, Na}, title = {A Balance between Ideals and Reality — Establishing and Evaluating a Resilient City Indicator System for Central Chinese Cities}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4030}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20191121-40309}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {212}, abstract = {Recent years have seen a gradual shift in focus of international policies from a national and regional perspective to that of cities, a shift which is closely related to the rapid urbanization of developing countries. As revealed in the 2011 Revision of the World Urbanization Prospects published by the United Nations, 51\% of the global population (approximately 3.6 billion people) lives in cities. The report predicts that by 2050, the world's urban population will increase by 2.3 billion, making up 68\% of the population. The growth of urbanization in the next few decades is expected to primarily come from developing countries, one third of which will be in China and India. With rapid urbanization and the ongoing growth of mega cities, cities must become increasingly resilient and intelligent to cope with numerous challenges and crises like droughts and floods arising from extreme climate, destruction brought by severe natural disasters, and aggregated social contradictions resulting from economic crises. All cities face the urban development dynamics and uncertainties arising from these problems. Under such circumstances, cities are considered the critical path from crisis to prosperity, so scholars and organizations have proposed the construction of "resilient cities." On the one hand, this theory emphasizes cities' defenses and buffering capacity against disasters, crises and uncertainties, as well as recovery after destruction; on the other hand, it highlights the learning capacity of urban systems, identification of opportunities amid challenges, and maintenance of development vitality. Some scholars even believe that urban resilience is a powerful supplement to sustainable development. Hence, resilience assessment has become the latest and most important perspective for evaluating the development and crisis defense capacity of cities. Rather than a general abstract concept, urban resilience is a comprehensive measurement of a city's level of development. The dynamic development of problems is reflected through quantitative indicators and appraisal systems not only from the perspective of academic research, but also governmental policy, so as to scientifically guide development, and measure and compare cities' development levels. Although international scholars have proposed quantitative methods for urban resilience assessment, they are however insufficiently systematic and regionally adaptive for China's current urban development needs. On the basis of comparative study on European and North American resilient city theories, therefore, this paper puts forwards a theoretical framework for resilient city systems consistent with China's national conditions in light of economic development pressure, natural resource depletion, pollution, and other salient development crises in China. The key factors influencing urban resilience are taken into full consideration; expert appraisal is conducted based on the Delphi Method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to design an extensible and updatable resilient city evaluation system which is sufficiently systematic, geographically adaptable, and sustainable for China's current urban development needs. Finally, Changsha is taken as the main case for empirical study on comprehensive evaluation of similar cities in Central China to improve the indicator system.}, subject = {Stadtplanung}, language = {en} } @article{Vollmer, author = {Vollmer, Lisa}, title = {Der Gentrifizierungsbegriff in wohnungspolitischen Protesten. Kommentar zu Neil Smiths „F{\"u}r eine Theorie der Gentrifizierung: ‚Zur{\"u}ck in die Stadt' als Bewegung des Kapitals, nicht der Menschen" (2019 [1979])}, series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung}, volume = {2019}, journal = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung}, number = {Band 7, Heft 3}, doi = {10.36900/suburban.v7i3.493}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200122-40643}, pages = {113 -- 118}, abstract = {Seit 50 Jahren wird {\"u}ber Erkl{\"a}rungsans{\"a}tze f{\"u}r Gentrifizierung gestritten. Sehr viel l{\"a}nger schon wandert anlagesuchendes Kapital von einem Ort zum anderen und hinterl{\"a}sst dabei Investitionsruinen einerseits und Menschen, die durch Verdr{\"a}ngung ihr Zuhause verlieren, andererseits. Sehr viel k{\"u}rzer erst wird der Begriff Gentrifizierung hier und da von sozialen Bewegungen aufgegriffen, die sich mit letzterem Ph{\"a}nomen auseinandersetzen. In diesem Beitrag soll es nicht um die wissenschaftliche Debatte um Erkl{\"a}rungsans{\"a}tze f{\"u}r Gentrifizierung und auch nicht um die wissenschaftliche Relevanz des Begriffes gehen, sondern um seine Rolle und Funktion in sozialen Bewegungen.}, subject = {Soziale Bewegung}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Elazzazy, author = {Elazzazy, Mohamed}, title = {The Garden Suburbs of Cairo. A morphological urban analysis of Zamālik, Ma'ādī, and Heliopolis}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4149}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200506-41491}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {222}, abstract = {During the British occupation of Egypt in the beginning of the 20th century, several suburban developments were established on the periphery of the city of Cairo. These initially attracted the small British community and later foreigners and Egyptians, mainly from the elite community. These suburban developments, including Ma'ādī, Zamālik, Heliopolis, Qubbah-Gardens, and Garden City, became the fashionable residential quarters of Cairo. Until now, some of these areas still represent the distinguishable residential settlements of the city. Ma'ādī, Zamālik, and Heliopolis specifically are nostalgically appropriated in the design of recent suburban developments around Greater Cairo. Some of the 20th century suburban developments around Cairo are labeled or described as "garden cities." During the early 20th century, two thriving British town planning movements emerged, namely, the garden city movement and the garden suburb movement. This study investigates the hypothesis that these suburban developments, are indeed "garden suburbs" like the British movement, despite that few are labeled or described as "garden cities,". Although several studies have examined the historical development of such settlements, their relation, however, to the British planning movements and their transfer process received little attention from planning historians. Few studies also analyze the urban design aspects that made these suburban developments distinguishable since their foundation and until today. To guide the validity of this study's hypothesis, a set of research questions are formulated: (1) What is the difference between the garden city and the garden suburb movements? (2) How were the British planning movements transferred to Egypt? (3) What are the urban design aspects that makes these suburban developments distinguishable as garden suburbs? To answer these research questions, a historical morphological urban analysis is conducted through case studies. The study first studies the difference between the garden city and the garden suburb movements, mainly in Britain, through the analysis of publications on the promoter of both movements: for the garden city, E. Howards' book "The Garden City of Tomorrow," published in 1902, and for the garden suburb, R. Unwin's books "Town Planning in Practice," published in 1909, and "Nothing Gained from Overcrowding," published in 1912. Then a morphological urban analysis of Letchworth Garden City and Brentham Garden Suburb, considered the first examples of each movement, is conducted. In order to analyze the transfer process, the study adopts M. Volait and J. Nasr's theory on transporting planning, through investigating the authority in power responsible for the establishment of these suburban developments. This is followed by the morphological urban analysis of three suburban developments around Cairo, namely, Zamālik, Ma'ādī, and Heliopolis. The morphological analysis focuses on the background of their establishment, authority in power responsible for the development, design principles, urban context, street typology, residential block typology, social infrastructure, and social target group. Finally, the study compares between Brentham, Letchworth, Zamālik, Ma'ādī, and Heliopolis. The comparative analysis aims to highlight the differences between the studied cases of Cairo and how they are different from or alike the British movements. This study concludes that the suburban developments around Cairo during the British occupation, are in fact garden suburbs, despite that some are being described or labeled as garden city. This movement was exported via urban land development companies with foreign European capital, rather than via colonial dominance. It finally highlights a set of urban design aspects that distinguish them as garden suburbs of Cairo. This study hopes to support future conservation plan of these areas and the design of future suburban developments.}, subject = {Kairo}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{OPUS4-4304, title = {Second urbanHIST Conference. Interpreting 20th Century European Urbanism}, editor = {Abarkan, Abdellah and Bihlmaier, Helene and Gimeno S{\´a}nchez, Andrea and Blaga, Andreea}, address = {Karlskrona}, organization = {urbanHIST}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4304}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201218-43046}, pages = {135}, abstract = {urbanHIST (2019). Second urbanHIST Conference. Interpreting 20th Century European Urbanism. Stockholm, 21-23 October 2019 Conference Booklet}, subject = {St{\"a}dtebau}, language = {en} } @misc{OPUS4-6370, title = {Gemeinwohlbilanz Fragenleitfaden. Kampagne 2019}, organization = {Ajuntament de Barcelona}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.6370}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230523-63706}, pages = {45}, abstract = {In diesem Dokument gehen wir den gesamten Fragebogen f{\"u}r die vollst{\"a}ndige Gemeinwohlbilanz (kurz GB, katalanisch Balan{\c{c}} Comunitari bzw. BC) Frage f{\"u}r Frage durch und erkl{\"a}ren, was mit jeder einzelnen Frage gemeint ist und welche Informationen anzugeben sind. Es wird daher sehr empfohlen, vor dem Ausf{\"u}llen des Fragebogens in der App einen Blick auf den gesamten Fragenkatalog zu werfen, weil dies die Erhebung der Daten und die Verteilung der Aufgaben auf die verschiedenen mit der Erstellung der GB befassten Personen erleichtert. Die GB ist ein Selbstevaluierungstool, mit dem Organisationen ihre T{\"a}tigkeit unter Umwelt-, Sozial- und Governance-Aspekten bewerten k{\"o}nnen.}, subject = {Gemeinwohl}, language = {de} }