@article{TarabenMorgenthal,
  author    = {Taraben, Jakob and Morgenthal, Guido},
  title     = {Integration and Comparison Methods for Multitemporal Image-Based 2D Annotations in Linked 3D Building Documentation},
  series = {Remote Sensing},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Remote Sensing},
  number    = {Volume 14, issue 9, article 2286},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  doi       = {10.3390/rs14092286},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220513-46488},
  pages     = {1 -- 20},
  abstract  = {Data acquisition systems and methods to capture high-resolution images or reconstruct 3D point clouds of existing structures are an effective way to document their as-is condition. These methods enable a detailed analysis of building surfaces, providing precise 3D representations. However, for the condition assessment and documentation, damages are mainly annotated in 2D representations, such as images, orthophotos, or technical drawings, which do not allow for the application of a 3D workflow or automated comparisons of multitemporal datasets. In the available software for building heritage data management and analysis, a wide range of annotation and evaluation functions are available, but they also lack integrated post-processing methods and systematic workflows. The article presents novel methods developed to facilitate such automated 3D workflows and validates them on a small historic church building in Thuringia, Germany. Post-processing steps using photogrammetric 3D reconstruction data along with imagery were implemented, which show the possibilities of integrating 2D annotations into 3D documentations. Further, the application of voxel-based methods on the dataset enables the evaluation of geometrical changes of multitemporal annotations in different states and the assignment to elements of scans or building models. The proposed workflow also highlights the potential of these methods for condition assessment and planning of restoration work, as well as the possibility to represent the analysis results in standardised building model formats.},
  subject      = {Bauwesen},
  language  = {en}
}
@periodical{AinioBartetzkyGyőrffyetal.,
  author    = {Ainio, Anna and Bartetzky, Arnold and Győrffy, Rachel and Islam, Naslima and Khvadagiani, Irakli and Kibel, Jochen and Landau-Donnelly, Friederike and Leko, Kristina and Lenz, Patricia and Onuoha, Nnenna and Rathjen, Lukas and Reinsch, Natalie and Rykov, Anatol and Tajeri, Niloufar and Ullmanov{\´a}, Kl{\´a}ra},
  title     = {Censored? Conflicted Concepts of Cultural Heritage},
  editor    = {Din{\c{c}}{\c{c}}ağ Kahveci, Ay{\c{s}}eg{\"u}l and Hajdu, Marcell and H{\"o}hne, Wolfram and Jesse, Darja and Karpf, Michael and Torres Ruiz, Marta},
  publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag},
  address   = {Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-95773-304-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4927},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230213-49276},
  pages     = {181},
  abstract  = {Those who ask how social entities relate to the past, enter a field defined by competing interpretations and contested practices of a collectively shared heritage. Dissent and conflict among heritage communities represent productive moments in the negotiation of these varying constructs of the past, identities, and heritage. At the same time, they lead to omissions, the overwriting and amendment of existing constructs. A closer look at all that is suppressed, excluded or rejected opens up new perspectives: It reveals how social groups are formed through public disputes upon the material foundations of heritage constructs. Taking the concept of censorship, the volume engages with the exclusionary and inclusionary mechanisms that underlie the construction of heritage and thus social identities. Censorship is understood here as a discursive strategy in public debates. In current debates, allegations of censorship surface primarily in cases where the handling of a certain heritage constructs is subjected to critical evaluation, or on the contrary, needs to be protected from criticism or even destruction. The authors trace the connection between heritage and identity and show that identity constructs are not only manifested within heritage but are actively negotiated through it.},
  subject      = {Kulturerbe},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Wellnitz,
  author    = {Wellnitz, Felix},
  title     = {BAUKLIMATISCHE ERT{\"U}CHTIGUNG UND NACHHALTIGE INSTANDSETZUNG DENKMALGESCH{\"U}TZTER VERWALTUNGSBAUTEN DER 1950er JAHRE AM BEISPIEL DER EHEMALIGEN BAYERISCHEN LANDESVERTRETUNG VON SEP RUF IN BONN},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2303},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20140919-23031},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {172},
  abstract  = {Viele Baudenkmale sind dem Konflikt aus baulichem Instandsetzungsbedarf f{\"u}r eine zeitgem{\"a}ße Nutzung und einer sich m{\"o}glicherweise daraus ergebenden Gef{\"a}hrdung der Denkmalsubstanz ausgesetzt. Gr{\"u}nde sind steigende Energiekosten f{\"u}r den Geb{\"a}udebetrieb, zeitgem{\"a}ße Anforderungen an Behaglichkeit und Arbeitsschutz, sowie die Vermeidung von Sch{\"a}den an der Substanz aufgrund baulicher M{\"a}ngel des konstruktiven W{\"a}rme- und Feuchteschutzes. Gleichzeitig gilt f{\"u}r viele Bauten aber auch die Notwendigkeit regelm{\"a}ßiger Nutzung und Bewirtschaftung, um den Erhalt {\"u}berhaupt zu sichern. Die energetische Ert{\"u}chtigung von Baudenkmalen scheitert in diesem Spannungsfeld oft am unl{\"o}sbaren Konflikt zwischen dem Erhalt der bauzeitlichen Substanz auf der einen und der notwendigen energetischen Optimierung der Geb{\"a}udeh{\"u}lle auf der anderen Seite. Zielsetzung dieser Fallstudie ist die beispielhafte Entwicklung einer bauklimatischen und denkmalgerechten Ert{\"u}chtigungsstrategie am Beispiel eines Verwaltungsgeb{\"a}udes der Nachkriegsmoderne als Beitrag zur L{\"o}sung dieses Konfliktes.},
  subject      = {Denkmalpflege},
  language  = {de}
}