@article{HarirchianLahmerBuddhirajuetal.,
  author    = {Harirchian, Ehsan and Lahmer, Tom and Buddhiraju, Sreekanth and Mohammad, Kifaytullah and Mosavi, Amir},
  title     = {Earthquake Safety Assessment of Buildings through Rapid Visual Screening},
  series = {Buildings},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {Buildings},
  number    = {Volume 10, Issue 3},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  doi       = {10.3390/buildings10030051},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200331-41153},
  pages     = {15},
  abstract  = {Earthquake is among the most devastating natural disasters causing severe economical, environmental, and social destruction. Earthquake safety assessment and building hazard monitoring can highly contribute to urban sustainability through identification and insight into optimum materials and structures. While the vulnerability of structures mainly depends on the structural resistance, the safety assessment of buildings can be highly challenging. In this paper, we consider the Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) method, which is a qualitative procedure for estimating structural scores for buildings suitable for medium- to high-seismic cases. This paper presents an overview of the common RVS methods, i.e., FEMA P-154, IITK-GGSDMA, and EMPI. To examine the accuracy and validation, a practical comparison is performed between their assessment and observed damage of reinforced concrete buildings from a street survey in the Bing{\"o}l region, Turkey, after the 1 May 2003 earthquake. The results demonstrate that the application of RVS methods for preliminary damage estimation is a vital tool. Furthermore, the comparative analysis showed that FEMA P-154 creates an assessment that overestimates damage states and is not economically viable, while EMPI and IITK-GGSDMA provide more accurate and practical estimation, respectively.},
  subject      = {Maschinelles Lernen},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MousaviSteinkeJuniorTeixeiraetal.,
  author    = {Mousavi, Seyed Nasrollah and Steinke J{\´u}nior, Renato and Teixeira, Eder Daniel and Bocchiola, Daniele and Nabipour, Narjes and Mosavi, Amir and Shamshirband, Shahaboddin},
  title     = {Predictive Modeling the Free Hydraulic Jumps Pressure through Advanced Statistical Methods},
  series = {Mathematics},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {Mathematics},
  number    = {Volume 8, Issue 3, 323},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  doi       = {10.3390/math8030323},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200402-41140},
  pages     = {16},
  abstract  = {Pressure fluctuations beneath hydraulic jumps potentially endanger the stability of stilling basins. This paper deals with the mathematical modeling of the results of laboratory-scale experiments to estimate the extreme pressures. Experiments were carried out on a smooth stilling basin underneath free hydraulic jumps downstream of an Ogee spillway. From the probability distribution of measured instantaneous pressures, pressures with different probabilities could be determined. It was verified that maximum pressure fluctuations, and the negative pressures, are located at the positions near the spillway toe. Also, minimum pressure fluctuations are located at the downstream of hydraulic jumps. It was possible to assess the cumulative curves of pressure data related to the characteristic points along the basin, and different Froude numbers. To benchmark the results, the dimensionless forms of statistical parameters include mean pressures (P*m), the standard deviations of pressure fluctuations (σ*X), pressures with different non-exceedance probabilities (P*k\%), and the statistical coefficient of the probability distribution (Nk\%) were assessed. It was found that an existing method can be used to interpret the present data, and pressure distribution in similar conditions, by using a new second-order fractional relationships for σ*X, and Nk\%. The values of the Nk\% coefficient indicated a single mean value for each probability.},
  subject      = {Maschinelles Lernen},
  language  = {en}
}