@periodical{AinioBartetzkyGyőrffyetal.,
  author    = {Ainio, Anna and Bartetzky, Arnold and Győrffy, Rachel and Islam, Naslima and Khvadagiani, Irakli and Kibel, Jochen and Landau-Donnelly, Friederike and Leko, Kristina and Lenz, Patricia and Onuoha, Nnenna and Rathjen, Lukas and Reinsch, Natalie and Rykov, Anatol and Tajeri, Niloufar and Ullmanov{\´a}, Kl{\´a}ra},
  title     = {Censored? Conflicted Concepts of Cultural Heritage},
  editor    = {Din{\c{c}}{\c{c}}ağ Kahveci, Ay{\c{s}}eg{\"u}l and Hajdu, Marcell and H{\"o}hne, Wolfram and Jesse, Darja and Karpf, Michael and Torres Ruiz, Marta},
  publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag},
  address   = {Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-95773-304-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4927},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230213-49276},
  pages     = {181},
  abstract  = {Those who ask how social entities relate to the past, enter a field defined by competing interpretations and contested practices of a collectively shared heritage. Dissent and conflict among heritage communities represent productive moments in the negotiation of these varying constructs of the past, identities, and heritage. At the same time, they lead to omissions, the overwriting and amendment of existing constructs. A closer look at all that is suppressed, excluded or rejected opens up new perspectives: It reveals how social groups are formed through public disputes upon the material foundations of heritage constructs. Taking the concept of censorship, the volume engages with the exclusionary and inclusionary mechanisms that underlie the construction of heritage and thus social identities. Censorship is understood here as a discursive strategy in public debates. In current debates, allegations of censorship surface primarily in cases where the handling of a certain heritage constructs is subjected to critical evaluation, or on the contrary, needs to be protected from criticism or even destruction. The authors trace the connection between heritage and identity and show that identity constructs are not only manifested within heritage but are actively negotiated through it.},
  subject      = {Kulturerbe},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Sidjimovska,
  author    = {Sidjimovska, Ivana},
  title     = {Out of the Periphery. Museum of Solidarity},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4902},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230228-49021},
  pages     = {13 -- 98},
  abstract  = {The artistic research work is concerned with webs of transnational artistic solidarity, especially those ingrained in the Nonaligned Movement (NAM), which embraced differences and united them in a common anti-imperialist and anti-colonial fight. Taking the museum as an artefact of historically situated solidarity, the project examines the instruments of transnational art solidarity for conceiving, developing and implementing decolonial cultural practices today. The main research question regards thinking about whether and how the emancipatory potential of the transnational art solidarity can be extracted, recuperated and translated when dealing with present issues of cultural decolonisation. Three museums founded on the bases of international solidarity and donations of artworks form the case study. Consequently, the research findings are systematised in three discourses: The Autonomous Museum; The Decolonial Museum; and The Museum in Exile.},
  subject      = {Kunst},
  language  = {en}
}