@phdthesis{Bockelmann, author = {Bockelmann, Leo}, title = {Zeit, dass sich was dreht. Windenergieanlagen aus denkmalkundlicher Perspektive}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4543}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20211210-45439}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {233}, abstract = {Knapp 30.000 Windenergieanlagen zwischen Nordsee und Alpen lassen un{\"u}bersehbar erkennen, dass sich unser Energiesystem in einer umfassenden Transformation befindet. Allenthalben erf{\"a}hrt diese Entwicklung eine breite und kontroverse Rezeption und auch in der Denkmalpflege werden Windenergieanlagen aufgrund ihrer mitunter erheblichen Auswirkungen auf die Landschaft noch {\"u}berwiegend als St{\"o}rung wahrgenommen. Diese Arbeit nimmt dagegen die historische Entwicklung in den Blick und pl{\"a}diert daf{\"u}r, Windenergieanlagen als bedeutendes Kulturerbe zu verstehen. Angesichts des Voranschreitens der Energiewende wird angenommen, dass gerade {\"a}lteren Modellen als baulichen Zeugnissen umfangreicher energiepolitischer Ver{\"a}nderungen seit den 1970er Jahren eine hohe Bedeutung zugeschrieben werden kann. Daher besteht das Ziel darin, Windenergieanlagen herauszuarbeiten, welche als hervorragende Zeugnisse der Entwicklung der Windenergienutzung in Deutschland zu bewerten sind. Zur Ann{\"a}herung werden diese zun{\"a}chst als Untersuchungsgegenstand typologisch abgegrenzt. Eine wesentliche Besonderheit von Windenergieanlagen besteht darin, dass sie im Verh{\"a}ltnis zur eigentlichen Fl{\"a}chenversiegelung durch ihre vertikale Struktur erhebliche visuelle Auswirkungen auf die Landschaft haben. Anschließend wird die Entwicklung der Windenergienutzung seit den 1970er Jahren genauer betrachtet, welche insgesamt nicht linear verlief und von vielen Konflikten gekennzeichnet ist. Diese muss im Kontext eines wachsenden Umweltbewusstseins verstanden werden, das umfangreiche energiepolitische Ver{\"a}nderungen zur Folge hatte. Auf dieser Grundlage werden schließlich in einer denkmalkundlichen Reihenuntersuchung Windenergieanlagen herausgearbeitet, welche in hervorragender Weise von der Entwicklung zeugen. Die Auswahl bleibt allerdings mit sechs Objekten im Verh{\"a}ltnis zum Gesamtbestand von knapp 30.000 Anlagen relativ beschr{\"a}nkt, weil das auf die Abgrenzung von Besonderheiten ausgelegte etablierte Denkmalverst{\"a}ndnis bei einem zeitlich so dichten Bestand gleichartiger Bauwerke an eine Grenze kommt. Abschließend werden m{\"o}gliche Erhaltungsperspektiven sowie denkmaltheoretische und -praktische Schlussfolgerungen diskutiert. Dabei ist unbedingt ein Erhalt am Ursprungsstandort anzustreben, wobei im Einzelfall entschieden werden muss, ob Belange des Funktions- oder Substanzerhaltes h{\"o}her zu gewichten sind. Die skizzierten Auswahlprobleme regen dar{\"u}ber hinaus zur Diskussion zus{\"a}tzlicher denkbarer Bewertungskategorien an, wobei sich insbesondere die gesellschaftliche Wahrnehmung und {\"o}kologische Werte aufdr{\"a}ngen. Zudem kann f{\"u}r die st{\"a}rkere Ber{\"u}cksichtigung von Funktionszusammenh{\"a}ngen bei der Betrachtung technischer Infrastruktur in der Denkmalpflege pl{\"a}diert werden. Insgesamt f{\"u}hrt die denkmalkundliche Auseinandersetzung mit Windenergieanlagen damit weit {\"u}ber die Herausarbeitung einzelner Objekte hinaus und macht eindr{\"u}cklich auf aktuelle Herausforderungen der Denkmalpflege und dar{\"u}ber hinaus aufmerksam.}, subject = {Industriekultur}, language = {de} } @misc{EckardtAlSadaty, author = {Eckardt, Frank and AlSadaty, Aliaa}, title = {Urban Heritage in Transformation: Physical and Non-Physical Dimensions of Changing Contexts}, series = {Urban Planning}, volume = {2023}, journal = {Urban Planning}, number = {Volume 8, No. 1}, publisher = {Cogitatio Press}, address = {Lissabon}, doi = {10.17645/up.v8i1.6633}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230524-63850}, pages = {4}, abstract = {Urban heritage is at the core of the process of many changes observable in the cities today. The pace of urban change in heritage contexts, however, differs widely across the globe. In some areas, it goes slowly, in others it is astonishingly rapid. In some cases, change is coupled with risks of erosion of heritage and urban areas of value and in others change is synonymous with prosperity and positive impacts. Change in urban heritage areas is not only confined to the physical and tangible aspects, but needs to be regarded as mirroring changes related socio-political practices, economic implications, and cultural impacts. In this regard, the present thematic issue looks at various patterns of the interrelationship between heritage and urban change from both the physical and the non-physical perspectives. This editorial presents the topic of urban heritage and patterns of physical and non-physical transformation in urban heritage contexts and introduces the thematic issue "Urban Heritage and Patterns of Change: Spatial Practices of Physical and Non-Physical Transformation."}, subject = {Stadt}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Arkarapotiwong, author = {Arkarapotiwong, Piyadech}, title = {THE INVESTIGATION OF LIVING HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES IN LIVING HERITAGE SITES}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2408}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20150619-24086}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {303}, abstract = {The conservation of living heritage sites is a highly complex process. Two factors need careful consideration in order to achieve a balance in the management of such sites: the conservation demands of conservation experts for built heritage and the needs of local people for development of their heritage living space. The complexity of factors involved make for an interesting study of living heritage, taken up by this research in its main case study of the town of Nan in Thailand. Research into the historical background of Nan and its cultural heritage reveals a living heritage site, which is both unique and diverse. Present day Nan was examined using a variety of analysis tools, which were applied to data from interviews, empirical data, field surveys, and documents, in order to better understand the nature of the living heritage site and changing trends over time. Luang Prabang in Lao PDR, a World Heritage site since 1995, was also selected as a further case study with which to compare Nan's potential World Heritage status from a point of view of changes to living heritage attributes. The outcomes of the research indicate the importance of the management of the sites, which can be at risk of losing balance by focusing on one aspect of heritage to the detriment of the other. The conservation perspective, if allowed to dominate, as in Luang Prabang, can cause irreparable damage to the social fabric, where the development needs of the town are not met. This research concludes that a balance of power amongst stakeholders in the collaborative networks managing such sites is vital to sustaining a balance of living heritage attributes.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Arzmi, author = {Arzmi, Azmah}, title = {Reinterpreting Marzahn, Berlin \& Petržalka, Bratislava: From Process of State Socialist Utopia to Utopia of State Capitalist Process}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4392}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210315-43927}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {Housing estates were fundamentally conceived upon state socialist utopia ideas to provide standard housing for citizens. While former state socialist housing estates have been extensively researched in the field of architecture, urban and sociology studies, there is still a gap in identifying how production processes affect morphological changes during the post-socialist era. This thesis compares the processes in the production of the largest housing estates of Marzahn in GDR and Petržalka in Czechoslovakia from 1970 to 1989 through contextual analysis of primary and secondary sources, which include visual maps, diagrams from professional architecture and planning journals, government documents and textbooks, as well as academic journals, books and newspaper articles. Then it discusses how these processes inadvertently created conducive conditions affecting their development in the market economy after 1989. It then interprets the results through application of Actor-Network Theory and Historical Institutionalism, while conceptualising them through David Harvey's dialectical utopianism theory. Harvey (2000) delineates two types of utopia, one of spatial form and one of process. The former refers to materialised ideals in physical forms whereas the latter refers to the ongoing process of spatializing. The thesis aims to show how the production of Marzahn in GDR was more path dependent on policies established in 1950s and 1960s whereas Petržalka was a product of new Czechoslovakian policies in 1970s, changing aspects of the urban planning process, a manifestation of a more emphatic technocratic thinking on a wider scale. This ultimately influences the trajectories of development after 1989, showing more effects in Petržalka.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Shakir, author = {Shakir, Masooma Mohib}, title = {Reconstructing the Sufi Shrine as a Living Heritage: Case of the Shrine of Shah Abdul Latif Bhitai, Sindh, Pakistan}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3770}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20180719-37708}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {Living heritage sites are strongly connected to their historical, geographical, socio-political and cultural context. A descriptive narrative of the evolutionary process of the living heritage site of a Sufi shrine is undertaken in this research. It focuses on the changing relationship between the spatial and socio-cultural aspects over time. The larger or macro regional context is interrelated to the micro architectural context. The tangible heritage is defined by and intimately tied to the intangible aspects of the heritage. It is these constituting macro and micro elements and their interrelationships particularly through space and architecture that the research thesis explores in its documentation and analysis. The Sufi shrine in the South Asian Pakistani context is representative of a larger culture in the precolonial era. It is an expression of an indigenous modernity, belonging to a certain time period, place and community. The Sufi shrine as a building type has evolved from the precolonial time period, particularly starting at the golden ages of the Muslim Empire in the world (9th - 12th century), through the colonial age when western modernity arrived until the current neoliberal paradigm within the post independence period. Continued and evolved use of space, ritualistic performances, multiple social groups using the site are various elements whose documentation and analysis can establish the essential co-relations that contribute to continuity of its historical living. Physical and social relation of the historic site to its immediate settlement context is also a significant element that preserves the socio-cultural context. The chosen case of the Shrine of Shah Abdul Latif Bhitai, situated in the small town of Bhitshah in the province of Sindh, Pakistan forms a unique example where the particular physical and socio-cultural environment forms the context within which the Sufi heritage lives and survives. It is well integrated within its context at multiple levels. What are these levels and how do the constituting elements integrate is a major subject of research? These form the background to defining some of the basic issues and questions addressed in this doctoral thesis. Given that living heritage sites are unique due to their particular association to the context, the case study method was used to gain deeper insight and understanding on the topic.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Arboleda, author = {Arboleda, Pablo}, title = {Reckoning with Incompiuto Siciliano: Unfinished Public Works as Modern Ruins and All which it Entails}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3265}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170715-32656}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {150}, abstract = {Since the end of the 1950s, Italy has focused part of its modernization on the erection of public works. Due to corruption, mafia, and further malpractice, this form of development has occasionally failed, producing a high number of constructions that have remained unfinished for decades. In 2007, the group of artists Alterazioni Video constructed an informal survey in the form of an on-line tool open to public contributions, which revealed that there are 395 unfinished public works in Italy from which 156, approximately 39.5\%, are located in Sicily alone. In view of such a statistic, Alterazioni Video opted to coin the term 'Incompiuto Siciliano' - literally 'Sicilian Incompletion' - to refer to unfinished public works as a formal architectural style. This re-interpretation, which aims to convey the recovered dignity of these 'modern ruins', considers unfinished public works a type of heritage with the potential to represent the entirety of Italian society. Furthermore, it goes as far as to say an unfinished public work is 'Incompiuto Siciliano' despite being located in another of the Italian regions. This doctoral dissertation embraces the artists' argument to develop a complete study of Incompiuto Siciliano by embedding this architectural style/artistic project within the main debates on modern ruins at present. This is important because it is expected to contribute to the revalorization and eventual recommissioning of unfinished sites by validating Incompiuto Siciliano in the realm of academia. Furthermore, this work aspires to be a worthwhile source of information for future investigations dealing with cultural interpretations of incompletion in any other context - a not unreasonable goal considering how unfinished works are one of the key urban topics after the 2008 financial crisis. Hence, this doctoral dissertation uses Incompiuto Siciliano to discuss a different perspective in each of the five chapters and, though these can be read as independent contributions, the objective is that all chapters read together, form a clear, concise, continuous unit. And so it must be said this is not a dissertation about unfinished public works in Italy; this is a dissertation about Incompiuto Siciliano as an artistic response to unfinished public works in Italy - which clearly requires an interdisciplinary analysis involving Urban Studies, Cultural Geography, Contemporary Archaeology, Critical Heritage and Visual Arts.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {en} } @periodical{BognerKarpfWilleretal., author = {Bogner, Simone and Karpf, Michael and Willer, Stefan and Aquilar, Giorgia and Springer, J{\"o}rg and Euler-Rolle, Bernd and Sikiaridi, Elizabeth and Vogelaar, Frans and von Beckerath, Verena and Klei, Alexandra and Raheem, Oluwafunminiyi and Grundig, Ronny and Sezer, {\"O}zge and Kutkina, Anna and Manka, Inge and Hettchen, Karolina and J{\"u}ttner, Monique and Blunk, Julian}, title = {Praktiken des Erbens. Metaphern, Materialisierungen, Machtkonstellationen}, editor = {Bogner, Simone and Karpf, Michael and Meier, Hans-Rudolf}, publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag}, address = {Weinstraße-Ilmtal}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4702}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220810-47025}, abstract = {Ausgehend von der Bemerkung des Philosophen Jacques Derrida, dass Erbe immer auch eine Aufgabe sei, widmet sich der dritte Band der Schriftenreihe des Graduiertenkollegs „Identit{\"a}t und Erbe" den sozialen und kulturellen Praktiken der Bezugnahme auf Vergangenheit(en) und Identit{\"a}t(en). Mit einem (kulturellen) Erbe soll und muss etwas getan werden, um es {\"u}berhaupt hervorzubringen. Es konstituiert sich erst im Akt des (Nicht-)Erbens, das heißt im Wechselverh{\"a}ltnis mit den mit und an ihm ausgef{\"u}hrten Praktiken. Gleichwohl erm{\"o}glicht erst deren Verbindung mit den materiellen {\"U}berresten und {\"U}berlieferungen des Erbes eine Aneignung oder Ablehnung der Vergangenheit sowie die Fort- und Umschreibung eines bereits bestehenden Erbes. Diese Vorg{\"a}nge sind nicht willk{\"u}rlicher Natur: Die M{\"o}glichkeiten zur Interpretation und Deutung werden durch die sozialen, politischen, kulturellen, {\"o}konomischen und technischen Bedingungen der Gegenwart sowie durch die Geschichte und Materialit{\"a}t des Erbes beschr{\"a}nkt, erweitert und gelenkt. Erbe und Erbeprozesse m{\"u}ssen deshalb notwendigerweise miteinander in Beziehung gesetzt werden. Mit Beitr{\"a}gen von Simone Bogner und Michael Karpf, Stefan Willer, Giorgia Aquilar, J{\"o}rg Springer, Bernd Euler-Rolle, Elizabeth Sikiaridi und Frans Vogelaar, Verena von Beckerath, Alexandra Klei, Oluwafunminiyi Raheem, Ronny Grundig, {\"O}zge Sezer, Anna Kutkina, Inge Manka, Karolina Hettchen und Monique J{\"u}ttner sowie Julian Blunk.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {de} } @book{deOliveiraPinto, author = {de Oliveira Pinto, Tiago}, title = {Music as living heritage}, publisher = {Edition EMVAS}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-9817865-2-1}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4071}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200123-40713}, publisher = {Hochschule f{\"u}r Musik FRANZ LISZT}, pages = {211}, abstract = {What is cultural heritage, and why has it received so much public interest in recent years? Almost three decades after the World Organization UNESCO defined and established international recognition of Cultural and Natural Heritage sites and devised ways of protecting them, a completely new approach to cultural heritage emerged with the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage in 2003. This global agreement for the maintenance, protection and dissemination of cultural manifestations and achievements that are not tangible objects or immobile monuments, like previous items classified as World Heritage, was a remarkable milestone of international cultural politics. This new understanding of cultural heritage owes much to representatives from Asian, African, and Latin American countries. In fact, just a few years after the promulgation of the 2003 Convention, the world cultural heritage map had already lost much of its European predominance. Asian countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, and India very soon showed up with lists of manifestations of their centenary (in some cases even millenary) national cultural heritages.}, subject = {Musik}, language = {en} } @article{Speitkamp, author = {Speitkamp, Winfried}, title = {Identit{\"a}t durch Erbe? Historische Jubil{\"a}en und Jahrestage in der Erinnerungskultur}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3646}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20171130-36467}, abstract = {Vortrag, gehalten am 13.12.2016 im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung des Graduiertenkollegs "Identit{\"a}t und Erbe" an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {de} } @book{RoseltHuberKiesslingetal., author = {Roselt, Sabine and Huber, Sophie and Kießling, Josepha and Neumeier, Lolina and Bahr, Linus}, title = {From Tradition to Television - Diverse Perspectives on Afghan Music}, editor = {Lell, Peter}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4368}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210510-43682}, publisher = {Hochschule f{\"u}r Musik FRANZ LISZT}, pages = {51}, abstract = {What is Afghan music and what is its contemporary state? This question seems important to ask, considering the conflictual recent past of the country that particularly affected cultural expressions such as music. In these four articles diverse perspectives on Afghan music are explored. From traditional music of the Afghan rubab and its masters up to popular music of the Afghan-German hiphop producer "Farhot", various insights are given into phenomena yet barely covered in academic works. This collection provides glimpses into the variety of the music of Afghanistan and the Afghan diaspora and help to shape the Western views on the music of the country into more diverse perspectives. We move further away from the bias of the majority of media representations predominantly showing the conflictual sides of Afghanistan, at the same time avoiding a limiting and narrow view on Afghanistan with solely a musical tradition located in the past. These essays go beyond and outline that apart from a rich tradition, there are present forms of musical expression. We move from "Tradition to Television" and beyond, exploring views on the future of music connected to Afghanistan.}, subject = {Musik}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Steiner, author = {Steiner, Marion}, title = {Die chilenische Steckdose. Kleine Weltgeschichte der deutschen Elektrifizierung von Valpara{\´i}so und Santiago, 1880-1920}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3925}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190517-39257}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {507, 155}, abstract = {Am Beispiel der Elektrifizierung zweier Großst{\"a}dte an der Westk{\"u}ste S{\"u}damerikas zeigt die Arbeit den globalen Einfluss deutscher Industrie- und Finanzakteure auf technische, st{\"a}dtebauliche und gesellschaftlich-kulturelle Entwicklungen zur Bl{\"u}tezeit des europ{\"a}ischen Imperialismus auf. Damit werden die Regionalgeschichten der chilenischen Hauptstadtregion und der Elektropolis Berlin zu einer Globalgeschichte miteinander verkn{\"u}pft. Ein Hauptaugenmerk der Analyse liegt dabei auf den weltweiten Akteursnetzwerken und Machtverh{\"a}ltnissen sowie dem kulturellen Erbe und seiner gegenw{\"a}rtigen Interpretation.}, subject = {Weltgeschichte}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Elrasoul, author = {Elrasoul, Riham}, title = {Designing Urban National Memory}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4048}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20191212-40489}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {The study of memory, architecture, and urban space has been the interest ‎of ‎researchers ‎from the diverse fields around the world due to, the significance of dealing ‎with ‎memories ‎especially after the tragedy of the Second World War. Nations in Europe has chosen ‎not to ‎neglect ‎their past, moreover, overcoming it by strengthening the national identity. An ‎approach was clear in ‎the literature, art, further in the way of rebuilding their cities; that mainly ‎has reflected on the ‎value of urban spaces and their role in narrating the country's national ‎memory. Thanks to this ‎approach, which has supported the post-war European nations to invite ‎to an act of ‎ forgiveness rather than to forget. ‎ On the contrary, memory, in relation to architecture is a form of knowledge has been ‎neglected in Egypt, especially during the previous decades after the declaration of independence ‎from the colonial power, and since 1952 revolution. Recently, a rising debate about Egypt ‎national history and the need to renationalize the Egyptian historical consciousness has rapidly ‎grown up, due to the political transformation has occurred because of the 25th uprising, 2011, ‎which unveiled the power of public spaces in constituting the nation thoughts, especially Tahrir ‎square.‎ At the same time, this has unveiled the results of neglecting the past instead of overcoming it; unveiled a present carries the danger of conflict and repeating previous mistakes. Researchers, historians, politicians, governmental organization, have ‎worked in the purpose of revisiting the historical information, and have tried to document the ‎current transformation of the 25th uprising. There was a public demand for redesigning Tahrir square to reflect the ‎memory of the uprising as a symbol of the power of the public. However, after eight years, those ‎memories have faded as if the 25th uprising has never happened. ‎ Those circumstances are very relevant to the gap between urban design and the art of ‎memory-work, in the scientific field. Few studies in Egypt conducted the concept of memory in ‎relation to urban spaces, however, the matter requires more attention, to associate the need for renationalizing Egypt ‎memory, with viewing urban space as a mean of narrating the country's national memory and ‎reflecting the citizens' current thoughts, as a try of nearing the distances between ‎competing ‎narratives. Therefore, the research aims at developing a methodological framework that should ‎contribute to renationalizing memory through urban space. Further, benefiting from the German experience by investigating lessons to learn. That is based on the hypothesis that, although there is no fixed formula for all countries to renationalize the historical ‎consciousness of memory through urban spaces, lessons to be learned from Germany experience ‎could be a driving dimension when designing Egyptian urban spaces with a concept of memory ‎as an essential factor. To guide the validity of the study's hypothesis, a set of research questions are thus ‎formulated: Starting from why memory is an essential factor when designing urban spaces? ‎Regarding Egypt national memory, how it was constituted through history and how to read its ‎representation on urban spaces? Also, the study quests the means of nationalizing memory ‎through urban spaces? And What are the learned lessons from the German experience?‎ The study tries to answer those questions. Via an inductive ‎analytical ‎methodology ‎which ‎moves from the gap of knowledge and from a particular situation ‎in Egypt, to study the German ‎experience in renationalizing the concept of memory through urban spaces.‎ ‎ Within the scope of the study, exploring Egypt prevailing narratives and the inherited ‎concepts which influenced the national memory is essential. Moreover, the research develops ‎analytical political psychosocial model that could help reading memories in urban spaces, ‎memory's actors, and memory influences. To validate this model, case studies are analysed in ‎light of the concluded aspects. Consequently, the expected result is to infer broad general ‎learned ‎lessons for the Egyptian case. ‎ Research findings and conclusions answer the research questions, interpret literature ‎review, recommend some guide points to three target groups: first, practice field; to encourage ‎designers to value the national and collective memories when designing urban spaces. Second, to ‎ask policymakers to take the public participation into consideration, when taking decisions related to urban ‎development. Third, the thesis recommends future researches of urban memory that connect ‎theoretical information with the practice field. ‎ Finally, enhancing the memory-work in relation to the national narrative, conveying a meaningful message, when ‎designing urban spaces could encourage citizens to learn, to interact, and to dissolve boundaries ‎between the competing narratives in post-conflict societies.‎}, subject = {Erinnerung}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Bleichner2008, author = {Bleichner, Stephan M.}, title = {Das elektronisch virtualisierte Baudenkmal}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1352}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20080930-14261}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, year = {2008}, abstract = {Die elektronische Virtualisierung von Baudenkmalen ist neues, außergew{\"o}hnlich vielf{\"a}ltiges medientechnisches Ph{\"a}nomen; es beschreibt die urspr{\"u}ngliche Form substanziell-realer Baudenkmale, transformiert sie von einer abstrakten Beschreibung in Wort und Bild in eine immaterielle Realit{\"a}t. Die Dissertation versucht Antworten zu geben auf folgende Fragen: Ist die elektronische Virtualisierung eine Methode der Stimulation der {\"O}ffentlichkeit im Umgang mit Baudenkmalen? Ist das elektronisch virtualisierte Baudenkmal ein immaterielles Zeugnis der Kulturgeschichte in der Zukunft? Ist das substanziell-reale und das virtualisierte Baudenkmal uneingeschr{\"a}nkt gegenseitig austauschbar, ist ersteres durch letzteres ersetzbar? Die Beantwortung der Fragen h{\"a}ngt ab von den Stufen der Perfektion der elektronischen Virtualsierung von Baudenkmalen.}, subject = {Baudenkmal}, language = {de} } @periodical{DolffBonekaemperPaulusSellmannetal., author = {Dolff-Bonek{\"a}mper, Gabi and Paulus, J{\"o}rg and Sellmann, Annika and Vogel, Carolin and Bargholz, Ortrun and Herrmann, Moritz Peter and L{\"o}ffler, Beate and Kretschmann, Schirin and Lotter, Stefanie and Ehrenpreis, David and Bockelmann, Leo and Langner, Sigrun and Sch{\"o}nberger, Sonya and Majdzadeh, Bahar}, title = {Collecting Loss}, editor = {Bogner, Simone and Dolff-Bonek{\"a}mper, Gabi and Meier, Hans-Rudolf}, publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag}, address = {Ilmtal-Weinstraße}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4321}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201221-43217}, pages = {168}, abstract = {Wer sich mit "Identit{\"a}t" und "Erbe" befasst, also mit dem Zusammenhang zwischen der Konstituierung und Stabilit{\"a}t von Gemeinwesen und dem Bewahren von G{\"u}tern, Orten und {\"U}berlieferungen, kommt nicht umhin, sich auch mit Verlusten zu befassen. Verlust bezeichnet hier nicht die Abwesenheit eines Gutes, das Erbe war oder h{\"a}tte werden k{\"o}nnen, sondern die soziale Beziehung zu dem verlorenen Gut und zu den Umst{\"a}nden seines Verlorengehens oder auch den Versuchen, es wiederzugewinnen.}, subject = {Verlust}, language = {mul} } @periodical{AinioBartetzkyGyőrffyetal., author = {Ainio, Anna and Bartetzky, Arnold and Győrffy, Rachel and Islam, Naslima and Khvadagiani, Irakli and Kibel, Jochen and Landau-Donnelly, Friederike and Leko, Kristina and Lenz, Patricia and Onuoha, Nnenna and Rathjen, Lukas and Reinsch, Natalie and Rykov, Anatol and Tajeri, Niloufar and Ullmanov{\´a}, Kl{\´a}ra}, title = {Censored? Conflicted Concepts of Cultural Heritage}, editor = {Din{\c{c}}{\c{c}}ağ Kahveci, Ay{\c{s}}eg{\"u}l and Hajdu, Marcell and H{\"o}hne, Wolfram and Jesse, Darja and Karpf, Michael and Torres Ruiz, Marta}, publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag}, address = {Weimar}, isbn = {978-3-95773-304-7}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4927}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230213-49276}, pages = {181}, abstract = {Those who ask how social entities relate to the past, enter a field defined by competing interpretations and contested practices of a collectively shared heritage. Dissent and conflict among heritage communities represent productive moments in the negotiation of these varying constructs of the past, identities, and heritage. At the same time, they lead to omissions, the overwriting and amendment of existing constructs. A closer look at all that is suppressed, excluded or rejected opens up new perspectives: It reveals how social groups are formed through public disputes upon the material foundations of heritage constructs. Taking the concept of censorship, the volume engages with the exclusionary and inclusionary mechanisms that underlie the construction of heritage and thus social identities. Censorship is understood here as a discursive strategy in public debates. In current debates, allegations of censorship surface primarily in cases where the handling of a certain heritage constructs is subjected to critical evaluation, or on the contrary, needs to be protected from criticism or even destruction. The authors trace the connection between heritage and identity and show that identity constructs are not only manifested within heritage but are actively negotiated through it.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Wieneke2009, author = {Wieneke, Lars}, title = {An analysis of productive user contributions in digital media applications for museums and cultural heritage.}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1442}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20101214-15285}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, year = {2009}, abstract = {In a historical perspective, the relationship between digital media and the museum environment is marked by the role of museums as example use cases for the appli- cation of digital media. Today, this exceptional use as an often technology oriented application has changed and instead digital media have turned into an integral part of mediation strategies in the museum environment. Alongside with this shift not only an increasing professionalization of application development but also a grow- ing demand for new content can be observed. Comparable to its role as the main cost factor in the media industry, the production of content rises to a challenge for museums. In particular small and medium scale european museums with limited funding and an often low level of staff coverage face this new demand and strive therefore for alternative production resources. While productive user contributions can be seen as such an alternative resource, user contributions are at the same time a manifestation for a different mode of in- teracting with content. In contrast to the dominantly passive role of audiences as re- ceivers of information, productive contributions emerge as a mode of content ex- ploration and become in this regard influential for museum mediation strategies. As applications of user contributions in museums and cultural heritage are currently rather seldom, a broader perspective towards user contributions becomes necessary to understand its specific challenges, opportunities and limitations. Productive user contributions can be found in a growing number of applications on the Internet where they either complement or fully substitute corporate content production processes. While the Wikipedia1, an online encyclopedia written entirely by a group of users and open to contributions by all its users, is one of the most prominent examples for this practice, several more applications emerged or are be- ing developed. In consequence user contributions are about to become a powerful source for the production of content in digital media environments.}, subject = {Neue Medien}, language = {en} } @book{OPUS4-2696, title = {Alles Heritage?}, editor = {Angermann, Kirsten and Engelberg-Dockal, Eva von and Warda, Johannes}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2696}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20161110-26961}, pages = {86}, abstract = {Die Erweiterung des Denkmalbegriffs hat zu einer Expansion des Erinnerns, Sch{\"u}tzens, Bewahrens und Tradierens auf alle Bereiche des Lebens gef{\"u}hrt. Heute werden nicht nur Scheunen, Tankstellen und Großwohnsiedlungen als Teil des historischen Erbes unter Denkmalschutz gestellt, sondern auch kulturelle Praktiken und Br{\"a}uche zum „immateriellen" Weltkulturerbe erkl{\"a}rt. Die Folge dieser als „Denkmal-Inflation" kritisierten Entwicklung ist eine versch{\"a}rfte Konkurrenz um Aufmerksamkeit und finanzielle Zuwendungen. Letzteres spiegelt sich nicht zuletzt in einer zunehmenden, maßgeblich von der Tourismusindustrie gef{\"o}rderten publikumswirksamen Inszenierung des Erbes. Im Zeitalter der „Heritage Industry" (Robert Hewison, 1987) bilden Kulturg{\"u}ter aber nicht nur einen wichtigen Standortfaktor, sondern wird das „Erbe" selbst zunehmend mittels internationaler Charten, Deklarationen, Plaketten und Social Media-Kampagnen konstruiert. Dies geschieht vorwiegend innerhalb eines anglophonen Diskurses, der aber an die deutschsprachigen begriffs- und ideengeschichtlich gepr{\"a}gten Diskussionen strenggenommen nicht anschlussf{\"a}hig ist. Dort l{\"a}sst sich ein - in einem {\"a}hnlichen Sinne umfassend zu nennender - Erbe-Begriff zwar bereits f{\"u}r die Heimatschutzbewegung konstatieren, eine fachlich ausdifferenzierte Denkmalpflege, wie wir sie heute kennen, tut sich jedoch schwer, ein solches universelles Konzept zu integrieren. W{\"a}hrend die „Heritagisierung" durch internationale Organisationen zu einer Verschiebung des Fokus von Baudenkmalen hin zur allgemeinen Bewahrung von Kulturerbe f{\"u}hrt (das immaterielle eingeschlossen, siehe etwa die Burra Charter), bleibt der Denkmal- und Erbe-Diskurs in den deutschsprachigen L{\"a}ndern bislang klar auf Baudenkmale und st{\"a}dtebauliche Ensembles konzentriert. Letzteres zeigt sich auch im Vorfeld des European Cultural Heritage Year 2018, das in Deutschland im Gegensatz zu anderen europ{\"a}ischen L{\"a}ndern maßgeblich von Denkmalschutzorganisationen getragen wird. Die Wende hin zum Heritage l{\"a}sst sich gleichermaßen bei neuen Forschungsfeldern und Ausbildungswegen der Denkmalpflege beobachten. So werden heute „Heritage Tourism" und „Dark Heritage" als spezifische Formen der „Denkmalnutzung" untersucht und bilden - in Erg{\"a}nzung zu den klassischen Disziplinen Kunstgeschichte, Architektur und Planung - „Heritage Management" und „Heritage Studies" grundst{\"a}ndige Studieng{\"a}nge. Letzteres gilt inzwischen auch f{\"u}r die deutschsprachigen L{\"a}nder. Der Weg f{\"u}hrt damit weg von der spezialisierten Kennerschaft zum Allrounder mit neuen Schwerpunkten auf Marketing, Verwaltung und Vermittlung. Mit Blick auf sozio-kulturelle Entwicklungen erweist sich, dass der Heritage-Begriff vor allem im {\"o}konomischen und politischen Diskurs weitgehend affirmativ gebraucht wird. Heritage geht demnach mit einem gewissen moralischen wie missionarischen Impetus einher, verbunden mit einer (Kultur-)Politik der „Identit{\"a}tsstiftung". In Zeiten, in denen „Identit{\"a}t" wieder als politisches Schlagwort im gesellschaftlichen Diskurs fungiert, scheint es um so wichtiger, die wissenschaftliche Besch{\"a}ftigung mit Heritage, die zugrunde liegenden begrifflichen Konzepte und pr{\"a}skriptiven Programme, kritisch zu reflektieren.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {de} } @article{SimonRitz, author = {Simon-Ritz, Frank}, title = {"Kultur ist Reichtum an Problemen": Wie sich der Kultur-Begriff der UNESCO an Egon Friedell ann{\"a}herte}, series = {Palmbaum: Literarisches Journal aus Th{\"u}ringen}, volume = {2023}, journal = {Palmbaum: Literarisches Journal aus Th{\"u}ringen}, number = {Heft 1}, publisher = {Quartus Verlag}, address = {Bucha bei Jena}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4952}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230411-49524}, pages = {4}, abstract = {Der in H. 1/2023 erschienene Essay f{\"u}hrt Gedanken einer in H. 1/2022 des "Palmbaum" erschienene Betrachtung (https://doi.org/10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4628) weiter. Im Zentrum stehen dabei die Bem{\"u}hungen der UNESCO um das immaterielle Kulturerbe.}, subject = {UNESCO}, language = {de} }