@misc{Nolde2010, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Nolde, Hendrik}, title = {Imagebildung in Gebieten des Programms „Soziale Stadt" am Beispiel von Jena-Winzerla}, isbn = {978-3-639-32687-1}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1446}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20110218-15351}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Das Bund-L{\"a}nder-Programm "Soziale Stadt" hat die Aufgabe, Stadtteile mit besonderem Entwicklungsbedarf zu f{\"o}rdern. Das negative Image ist einerseits Ursache, andererseits auch Folge von sozialen und st{\"a}dtebaulichen Problemlagen und Entwicklungen im Stadtteil. Diese Abw{\"a}rtsspirale soll durch das Programm aufgebrochen werden. Der Autor n{\"a}hert sich interdisziplin{\"a}r dem Imagebegriff an und zeigt die Auswirkungen des Programms "Soziale Stadt" auf die Großwohnsiedlung Jena-Winzerla. Die Studie erfasst anhand des semantischen Differentials das Image im Stadtteil, wie es von den Bewohnern beurteilt wird und vergleicht es mit der Sicht von Außen. Der Einfluß des Programms auf das Image wird durch Experteninterviews beleuchtet. Das Beispiel eigt die Entwicklungen, die das Programm "Soziale Stadt" bewirken kann. Es werden aber auch Grenzen deutlich. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden abschließend {\"U}berlegungen angestellt, in welche Richtungen die Entwicklungen innerhalb des F{\"o}rderprogramms gelenkt werden sollten, um das Image nachhaltig zu verbessern und betroffene Stadtteile ad{\"a}quat zu f{\"o}rdern.}, subject = {Soziale Stadt }, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Du2010, author = {Du, Juan}, title = {The Shaping of People's Space - An Inquiry of Human Environmental Experiences and Planning Practice, China}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1432}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20100913-15191}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, year = {2010}, abstract = {One of the main focuses of recent Chinese urban development is the creation and retrofitting of public spaces driven by the market force and demand. However, researches concerning human and cultural influences on shaping public spaces have been scanty. There still exist many undefined ambiguous planning aspects institutionally and legislatively. This is an explanatory research to address interactions, incorporations and interrelationship between the lived environment and its peoples. It is knowledge-seeking and normative. Theoretically, public space in a Chinese context is conceptualized; empirically, a selected case is inquired. The research has unfolded a comparatively complete understanding of China's planning evolution and on-going practices. Data collection emphasizes the concept of 'people' and 'space'. First-hand data is derived from the intensive fieldwork and observatory and participatory documentations. The ample detailed authentic empirical data empowers space syntax as a strong analysis tool in decoding how human's activities influence the public space. Findings fall into two categories but interdependent. Firstly, it discloses the studied settlement as a generic, organic and incremental development model. Its growth and established environment is evolutionary and incremental, based on its intrinsic traditions, life values and available resources. As a self-sustaining settlement, it highlights certain vernacular traits of spatial development out of lifestyles and cultural practices. Its spatial articulation appears as a process parallel to socio-economic transitions. Secondly, crucial planning aspects are theoretically summarized to address the existing gap between current planning methodology and practicalities. It pinpoints several most significant and particular issues, namely, disintegrated land use system and urban planning; missing of urban design in the planning system, loss of a human-responsive environment resulted from standardized planning and under-estimation of heritage in urban development. The research challenges present Chinese planning laws and regulations through urban public space study; and pinpoints to yield certain growth leverage for planning and development. Thus, planning is able to empower inhabitants to make decisions along the process of shaping and sustaining their space. Therefore, it discusses not only legislative issues, concerning land use planning, urban design and heritage conservation. It leads to a pivotal proposal, i.e., the integration of human and their social spaces in formulating a new spatial strategy. It expects to inform policymakers of underpinning social values and cultural practices in reconfiguring postmodern Chinese spatiality. It propounds that social context endemic to communities shall be integrated as a crucial tool in spatial strategy design, hence to strengthen spatial attributes and improve life quality.}, subject = {{\"O}ffentlicher Raum}, language = {en} }