@book{BrokowLogaEckardt2021,
  author    = {Brokow-Loga, Anton and Eckardt, Frank},
  title     = {Stadtpolitik f{\"u}r alle},
  publisher = {Graswurzelrevolution},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4390},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210315-43904},
  publisher      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {68},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Die Corona-Krise hat die Erosion st{\"a}dtischer Solidarit{\"a}t offen zu Tage treten lassen. Dagegen bringen Anton Brokow-Loga und Frank Eckardt in dieser Schrift die praktische Utopie einer solidarischen Postwachstumsstadt „auf den Punkt". Vom Commoning {\"u}ber die Umverteilung der st{\"a}dtischen Fl{\"a}chen bis zu einer sozial-{\"o}kologischen Verkehrswende: Eine progressive Stadtpolitik f{\"u}r alle {\"u}berwindet bisheriges Schubladendenken. Sie setzt stattdessen auf heterogene Zusammenh{\"a}nge und ungew{\"o}hnliche B{\"u}ndnisse. Zu dem hier umrissenen Vorhaben geh{\"o}rt auch, eine basisdemokratisch orientierte Stadtpolitik mit dem Ziel einer umfassenden Transformation von Stadt und Gesellschaft zu verkn{\"u}pfen. Wie kann ein Blick auf die kommunale Ebene helfen, globalen Ungerechtigkeiten zu begegnen? Welchen Weg weisen munizipalistische Plattformen und Vergemeinschaftungen jenseits von Privat- oder Staatseigentum?},
  subject      = {Transformation},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WernerHaaseRenneretal.,
  author    = {Werner, Franziska and Haase, Annegret and Renner, Nona and Rink, Dieter and Rottwinkel, Malena and Schmidt, Anika},
  title     = {The Local Governance of Arrival in Leipzig: Housing of Asylum-Seeking Persons as a Contested Field},
  series = {Urban Planning},
  journal   = {Urban Planning},
  number    = {Volume 3, Issue 4},
  editor    = {Eckardt, Frank},
  publisher = {Cogitatio Press},
  doi       = {10.17645/up.v3i4.1708},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190122-38460},
  pages     = {116 -- 128},
  abstract  = {The article examines how the German city of Leipzig governs the housing of asylum seekers. Leipzig was a frontrunner in organizing the decentralized accommodation of asylum seekers when adopting its accommodation concept in 2012. This concept aimed at integrating asylum-seeking persons in the regular housing market at an early stage of arrival. However, since then, the city of Leipzig faces more and more challenges in implementing the concept. This is particularly due to the increasingly tight situation on the housing market while the number of people seeking protection increased and partly due to discriminating and xenophobic attitudes on the side of house owners and managers. Therefore, we argue that the so-called refugee crisis of 2015-2016 has to be seen in close interaction with a growing general housing shortage in Leipzig like in many other large European cities. Furthermore, we understand the municipal governing of housing as a contested field regarding its entanglement of diverse federal levels and policy scales, the diversity of stakeholders involved, and its dynamic change over the last years. We analyze this contested field set against the current context of arrival and dynamic urban growth on a local level. Based on empirical qualitative research that was conducted by us in 2016, Leipzig's local specifics will be investigated under the umbrella of our conceptual framework of Governance of Arrival. The issues of a strained housing market and the integration of asylum seekers in it do not apply only to Leipzig, but shed light on similar developments in other European Cities.},
  subject      = {Stadtplanung},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Eckardt,
  author    = {Eckardt, Frank},
  title     = {European Cities Planning for Asylum},
  series = {Urban Planning},
  journal   = {Urban Planning},
  number    = {Volume 3, Issue 4},
  publisher = {Cogitatio Press},
  doi       = {10.17645/up.v3i4.1834},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190111-38424},
  pages     = {61 -- 63},
  abstract  = {Despite the high priority refugees are given in the public and political discussion, urban planning has not yet started to systematically consider the role of planning in asylum policy. Mostly, the subject of refugees' arrival is addressed in local projects and housing without framing challenges and opportunities in the national and European context. A wider discussion on the used terminology of "integration" is missing just as much as a self-critical reflection on the orientation of planning discourses on the issue of housing only. In this editorial our thematic issue "European Cities Planning for Asylum" is introduced andresented.},
  subject      = {Stadtplanung},
  language  = {en}
}