@article{AlYasiriMutasharGuerlebecketal.,
  author    = {Al-Yasiri, Zainab Riyadh Shaker and Mutashar, Hayder Majid and G{\"u}rlebeck, Klaus and Lahmer, Tom},
  title     = {Damage Sensitive Signals for the Assessment of the Conditions of Wind Turbine Rotor Blades Using Electromagnetic Waves},
  series = {Infrastructures},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Infrastructures},
  number    = {Volume 7, Issue 8 (August 2022), article 104},
  editor    = {Shafiullah, GM},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  doi       = {10.3390/infrastructures7080104},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220831-47093},
  pages     = {18},
  abstract  = {One of the most important renewable energy technologies used nowadays are wind power turbines. In this paper, we are interested in identifying the operating status of wind turbines, especially rotor blades, by means of multiphysical models. It is a state-of-the-art technology to test mechanical structures with ultrasonic-based methods. However, due to the density and the required high resolution, the testing is performed with high-frequency waves, which cannot penetrate the structure in depth. Therefore, there is a need to adopt techniques in the fields of multiphysical model-based inversion schemes or data-driven structural health monitoring. Before investing effort in the development of such approaches, further insights and approaches are necessary to make the techniques applicable to structures such as wind power plants (blades). Among the expected developments, further accelerations of the so-called "forward codes" for a more efficient implementation of the wave equation could be envisaged. Here, we employ electromagnetic waves for the early detection of cracks. Because in many practical situations, it is not possible to apply techniques from tomography (characterized by multiple sources and sensor pairs), we focus here on the question of whether the existence of cracks can be determined by using only one source for the sent waves.},
  subject      = {Windkraftwerk},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GuerlebeckLegatiukWebber,
  author    = {G{\"u}rlebeck, Klaus and Legatiuk, Dmitrii and Webber, Kemmar},
  title     = {Operator Calculus Approach to Comparison of Elasticity Models for Modelling of Masonry Structures},
  series = {Mathematics},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Mathematics},
  number    = {Volume 10, issue 10, article 1670},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  doi       = {10.3390/math10101670},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220721-46726},
  pages     = {1 -- 22},
  abstract  = {The solution of any engineering problem starts with a modelling process aimed at formulating a mathematical model, which must describe the problem under consideration with sufficient precision. Because of heterogeneity of modern engineering applications, mathematical modelling scatters nowadays from incredibly precise micro- and even nano-modelling of materials to macro-modelling, which is more appropriate for practical engineering computations. In the field of masonry structures, a macro-model of the material can be constructed based on various elasticity theories, such as classical elasticity, micropolar elasticity and Cosserat elasticity. Evidently, a different macro-behaviour is expected depending on the specific theory used in the background. Although there have been several theoretical studies of different elasticity theories in recent years, there is still a lack of understanding of how modelling assumptions of different elasticity theories influence the modelling results of masonry structures. Therefore, a rigorous approach to comparison of different three-dimensional elasticity models based on quaternionic operator calculus is proposed in this paper. In this way, three elasticity models are described and spatial boundary value problems for these models are discussed. In particular, explicit representation formulae for their solutions are constructed. After that, by using these representation formulae, explicit estimates for the solutions obtained by different elasticity theories are obtained. Finally, several numerical examples are presented, which indicate a practical difference in the solutions.},
  subject      = {Mauerwerk},
  language  = {en}
}