@misc{Lenz,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Lenz, Juliane},
  title     = {„Baus{\"u}nde" oder Denkmal? Zur Diskussion {\"u}ber den Umgang mit verschm{\"a}hten Bauwerken},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.6397},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230606-63979},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {187},
  abstract  = {F{\"u}r die einen also „Baus{\"u}nde", f{\"u}r die anderen ein erhaltenswertes Bauwerk - wie geht man damit um? F{\"u}r wen gilt wann etwas als „Baus{\"u}nde" und wann als erhaltenswert, welche Ziele werden damit verfolgt und Konzepte aufgezeigt? Inwieweit spielen beispielsweise Aspekte wie {\"A}sthetik, Funktionalit{\"a}t oder der allgemeine gesellschaftliche Kontext bzw. Wandel sowie das jeweils aktuelle und bauzeitliche planerische Leitbild bzw. Verst{\"a}ndnis eine Rolle bei der Verwendung des Begriffs und den Umgang f{\"u}r konkrete Bauwerke? Und inwieweit steht der Erhaltungswert bzw. eine Denkmalw{\"u}rdigkeit damit im Verh{\"a}ltnis und wie kann damit planerisch umgegangen werden? Der Diskussion {\"u}ber den Umgang mit verschm{\"a}hten Bauwerken will sich die vorliegende Abschlussarbeit n{\"a}hern. Als Bauwerke werden hierbei sowohl Geb{\"a}ude und Pl{\"a}tze als auch zur Erinnerung gesetzte Objekte wie Statuen verstanden.},
  subject      = {Denkmalpflege},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Elrasoul,
  author    = {Elrasoul, Riham},
  title     = {Designing Urban National Memory},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4048},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20191212-40489},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {The study of memory, architecture, and urban space has been the interest ‎of ‎researchers ‎from the diverse fields around the world due to, the significance of dealing ‎with ‎memories ‎especially after the tragedy of the Second World War. Nations in Europe has chosen ‎not to ‎neglect ‎their past, moreover, overcoming it by strengthening the national identity. An ‎approach was clear in ‎the literature, art, further in the way of rebuilding their cities; that mainly ‎has reflected on the ‎value of urban spaces and their role in narrating the country's national ‎memory. Thanks to this ‎approach, which has supported the post-war European nations to invite ‎to an act of ‎ forgiveness rather than to forget. ‎ On the contrary, memory, in relation to architecture is a form of knowledge has been ‎neglected in Egypt, especially during the previous decades after the declaration of independence ‎from the colonial power, and since 1952 revolution. Recently, a rising debate about Egypt ‎national history and the need to renationalize the Egyptian historical consciousness has rapidly ‎grown up, due to the political transformation has occurred because of the 25th uprising, 2011, ‎which unveiled the power of public spaces in constituting the nation thoughts, especially Tahrir ‎square.‎ At the same time, this has unveiled the results of neglecting the past instead of overcoming it; unveiled a present carries the danger of conflict and repeating previous mistakes. Researchers, historians, politicians, governmental organization, have ‎worked in the purpose of revisiting the historical information, and have tried to document the ‎current transformation of the 25th uprising. There was a public demand for redesigning Tahrir square to reflect the ‎memory of the uprising as a symbol of the power of the public. However, after eight years, those ‎memories have faded as if the 25th uprising has never happened. ‎ Those circumstances are very relevant to the gap between urban design and the art of ‎memory-work, in the scientific field. Few studies in Egypt conducted the concept of memory in ‎relation to urban spaces, however, the matter requires more attention, to associate the need for renationalizing Egypt ‎memory, with viewing urban space as a mean of narrating the country's national memory and ‎reflecting the citizens' current thoughts, as a try of nearing the distances between ‎competing ‎narratives. Therefore, the research aims at developing a methodological framework that should ‎contribute to renationalizing memory through urban space. Further, benefiting from the German experience by investigating lessons to learn. That is based on the hypothesis that, although there is no fixed formula for all countries to renationalize the historical ‎consciousness of memory through urban spaces, lessons to be learned from Germany experience ‎could be a driving dimension when designing Egyptian urban spaces with a concept of memory ‎as an essential factor. To guide the validity of the study's hypothesis, a set of research questions are thus ‎formulated: Starting from why memory is an essential factor when designing urban spaces? ‎Regarding Egypt national memory, how it was constituted through history and how to read its ‎representation on urban spaces? Also, the study quests the means of nationalizing memory ‎through urban spaces? And What are the learned lessons from the German experience?‎ The study tries to answer those questions. Via an inductive ‎analytical ‎methodology ‎which ‎moves from the gap of knowledge and from a particular situation ‎in Egypt, to study the German ‎experience in renationalizing the concept of memory through urban spaces.‎ ‎ Within the scope of the study, exploring Egypt prevailing narratives and the inherited ‎concepts which influenced the national memory is essential. Moreover, the research develops ‎analytical political psychosocial model that could help reading memories in urban spaces, ‎memory's actors, and memory influences. To validate this model, case studies are analysed in ‎light of the concluded aspects. Consequently, the expected result is to infer broad general ‎learned ‎lessons for the Egyptian case. ‎ Research findings and conclusions answer the research questions, interpret literature ‎review, recommend some guide points to three target groups: first, practice field; to encourage ‎designers to value the national and collective memories when designing urban spaces. Second, to ‎ask policymakers to take the public participation into consideration, when taking decisions related to urban ‎development. Third, the thesis recommends future researches of urban memory that connect ‎theoretical information with the practice field. ‎ Finally, enhancing the memory-work in relation to the national narrative, conveying a meaningful message, when ‎designing urban spaces could encourage citizens to learn, to interact, and to dissolve boundaries ‎between the competing narratives in post-conflict societies.‎},
  subject      = {Erinnerung},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Chilingaryan,
  author    = {Chilingaryan, Naira},
  title     = {Industrial Heritage: In-Between Memory and Transformation},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2229},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20140624-22291},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {Exploratory Research into Transformation Processes of Former Industrial Complexes of Leipziger Baumwollspinnerei (Leipzig) and Mattatoio di Testaccio (Rome); New Meanings of Industrial Heritage Physical manifestations of the Industrial Revolution left a permanent imprint on the complexion of cities. Abandonment that followed the deindustrialization contributed to an estrangement, turning derelict industrial spaces and run-down factories into a ballast to conjure with. At present, industrial heritage management applies flexibility and creativity, partially overcoming the essentially traditional paradigm of heritage preservation. This approach permits sustainable conservation - utilization and integration of disused industrial constructs in the contemporary urban landscape. Being a part of the European cultural stock, industrial heritage is an exciting and unique setting from many perspectives. It is defined and consumed by many markets, ranging from the industrial heritage tourism to the market of special events and festivals. Reused industrial buildings and factories come into view as products of post-industrial societies, fitting to the Western post-industrial (consumer) culture, offering a field of activities that are at an interface between the industrial history and contemporary socio-cultural milieu. Alteration of values, growth of new roles and definitions of industrial heritage, generated by functional restructuring, is a subject which is often left behind the general discussion about sustainable conservation and adaptive reuse of industrial heritage. Yet, in the modified state, industrial heritage is very complex to understand and to define. By conducting a desk and a case study research of former industrial complexes - Leipziger Baumwollspinnerei and Mattatoio di Testaccio, this doctoral thesis aims to identify industrial heritage as a contemporary (post-industrial) concept. Observation of ideas, values and definitions that emerge as a consequence of the transformation and re-conceptualization of industrial heritage are intended to raise awareness and appreciation of industrial heritage in the full richness of its contemporary interpretation.},
  subject      = {Denkmal},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Brock,
  author    = {Brock, Ingrid},
  title     = {Das faschistische Erbe im Herzen Roms - Das Beispiel Piazza Augusto Imperatore},
  series = {Denkmale und Gedenkst{\"a}tten. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift // Hochschule f{\"u}r Architektur und Bauwesen Weimar ; Jg. 41.1995, H. 4/5},
  journal   = {Denkmale und Gedenkst{\"a}tten. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift // Hochschule f{\"u}r Architektur und Bauwesen Weimar ; Jg. 41.1995, H. 4/5},
  editor    = {Hubel, Achim and Wirth, Hermann},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2074},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20131122-20740},
  pages     = {S. 129 -- S. 156},
  abstract  = {Im Rahmen eines Vortrags wurde ein begrenzter Bereich ausgew{\"a}hlt, an dessen Entstehung alle f{\"u}nf Disziplinen, die "la Grande Roma di Mussolini" gestalteten, gleichermaßen Anteil haben. Der St{\"a}dtebau - wie er bis zum 2. Weltkrieg praktiziert wurde -, die Architektur, die bildenden K{\"u}nste, die Denkmalpflege und vor allem die Arch{\"a}ologie in einer bis dahin unbekannten Vorreiterrolle. ...},
  subject      = {Denkmal},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Wirth1997,
  author    = {Wirth, Hermann},
  title     = {"Auch Schandmale sind denkmalwert" : zum Umgang mit baulich-r{\"a}umlichen Sachzeugen technischer und technologischer Fehlorientierung},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1186},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-11866},
  year      = {1997},
  abstract  = {Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 27. bis 30. Juni 1996 in Weimar an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t zum Thema: ‚Techno-Fiction. Zur Kritik der technologischen Utopien'},
  subject      = {Architektur},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schaebitz1993,
  author    = {Sch{\"a}bitz, Sabine},
  title     = {Bismarckturm und Totenburg : Machtsymbole im Schaffen von Wilhelm Kreis},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1130},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-11305},
  year      = {1993},
  abstract  = {Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 18. bis 21. Juni 1992 in Weimar an der Hochschule f{\"u}r Architektur und Bauwesen zum Thema: ‚Architektur und Macht'},
  subject      = {Kreis},
  language  = {de}
}