@article{Schoenig,
  author    = {Sch{\"o}nig, Barbara},
  title     = {Ererbte Transformation. Kommentar zu Matthias Bernt und Andrej Holm „Die Ostdeutschlandforschung muss das Wohnen in den Blick nehmen"},
  series = {s u b \ u r b a n. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {s u b \ u r b a n. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 8, Heft 3},
  publisher = {Sub\urban e.V.},
  address   = {Leipzig},
  doi       = {10.36900/suburban.v8i3.620},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210122-43296},
  pages     = {115 -- 122},
  abstract  = {Matthias Bernt und Andrej Holm weisen zu Recht darauf hin, dass es einer Forschung zu ostdeutschen St{\"a}dten als konzeptionell eigenst{\"a}ndigem Feld bedarf, die die spezifische Verr{\"a}umlichung des tiefgreifenden gesellschaftlichen Transformationsprozesses nach 1990 ins Zentrum stellt. Dabei betrachten sie insbesondere das Feld des Wohnens als produktiv, um Kenntnis {\"u}ber die Struktur und Wirkung dieses Prozesses zu erlangen. Allerdings bleiben sie vage dabei, wie eine solche spezifisch auf Ostdeutschland gerichtete Wohnungsforschung zu konzipieren w{\"a}re und in welcher Weise die Besonderheiten und Parallelit{\"a}ten ostdeutscher Entwicklungen zu den Transformationen von Wohnungs- und Stadtentwicklungspolitik in Westdeutschland, aber auch international, in Bezug zu setzen w{\"a}ren.},
  subject      = {Deutschland <{\"O}stliche L{\"a}nder>},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schoenig,
  author    = {Sch{\"o}nig, Barbara},
  title     = {Paradigm Shifts in Social Housing After Welfare-State Transformation : Learning from the German Experience},
  series = {International Journal of Urban and Regional Research},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {International Journal of Urban and Regional Research},
  publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
  doi       = {10.1111/1468-2427.12914},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200709-41966},
  pages     = {18},
  abstract  = {Welfare-state transformation and entrepreneurial urban politics in Western welfare states since the late 1970s have yielded converging trends in the transformation of the dominant Fordist paradigm of social housing in terms of its societal function and institutional and spatial form. In this article I draw from a comparative case study on two cities in Germany to show that the resulting new paradigm is simultaneously shaped by the idiosyncrasies of the country's national housing regime and local housing policies. While German governments have successively limited the societal function of social housing as a legitimate instrument only for addressing exceptional housing crises, local policies on providing and organizing social housing within this framework display significant variation. However, planning and design principles dominating the spatial forms of social housing have been congruent. They may be interpreted as both an expression of the marginalization of social housing within the restructured welfare housing regime and a tool of its implementation according to the logics of entrepreneurial urban politics.},
  subject      = {Deutschland},
  language  = {en}
}