@article{KavrakovKareemMorgenthal, author = {Kavrakov, Igor and Kareem, Ahsan and Morgenthal, Guido}, title = {Comparison Metrics for Time-histories: Application to Bridge Aerodynamics}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4186}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200625-41863}, pages = {28}, abstract = {Wind effects can be critical for the design of lifelines such as long-span bridges. The existence of a significant number of aerodynamic force models, used to assess the performance of bridges, poses an important question regarding their comparison and validation. This study utilizes a unified set of metrics for a quantitative comparison of time-histories in bridge aerodynamics with a host of characteristics. Accordingly, nine comparison metrics are included to quantify the discrepancies in local and global signal features such as phase, time-varying frequency and magnitude content, probability density, nonstationarity and nonlinearity. Among these, seven metrics available in the literature are introduced after recasting them for time-histories associated with bridge aerodynamics. Two additional metrics are established to overcome the shortcomings of the existing metrics. The performance of the comparison metrics is first assessed using generic signals with prescribed signal features. Subsequently, the metrics are applied to a practical example from bridge aerodynamics to quantify the discrepancies in the aerodynamic forces and response based on numerical and semi-analytical aerodynamic models. In this context, it is demonstrated how a discussion based on the set of comparison metrics presented here can aid a model evaluation by offering deeper insight. The outcome of the study is intended to provide a framework for quantitative comparison and validation of aerodynamic models based on the underlying physics of fluid-structure interaction. Immediate further applications are expected for the comparison of time-histories that are simulated by data-driven approaches.}, subject = {Ingenieurwissenschaften}, language = {en} } @article{ArtusKoch, author = {Artus, Mathias and Koch, Christian}, title = {Object-Oriented Damage Information Modeling Concepts and Implementation for Bridge Inspection}, series = {Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering}, volume = {2022}, journal = {Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering}, number = {Volume 36, issue 6}, doi = {10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001030}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220826-47087}, pages = {1 -- 21}, abstract = {Bridges are designed to last for more than 50 years and consume up to 50\% of their life-cycle costs during their operation phase. Several inspections and assessment actions are executed during this period. Bridge and damage information must be gathered, digitized, and exchanged between different stakeholders. Currently, the inspection and assessment practices rely on paper-based data collection and exchange, which is time-consuming and error-prone, and leads to loss of information. Storing and exchanging damage and building information in a digital format may lower costs and errors during inspection and assessment and support future needs, for example, immediate simulations regarding performance assessment, automated maintenance planning, and mixed reality inspections. This study focused on the concept for modeling damage information to support bridge reviews and structural analysis. Starting from the definition of multiple use cases and related requirements, the data model for damage information is defined independently from the subsequent implementation. In the next step, the implementation via an established standard is explained. Functional tests aim to identify problems in the concept and implementation. To show the capability of the final model, two example use cases are illustrated: the inspection review of the entire bridge and a finite-element analysis of a single component. Main results are the definition of necessary damage data, an object-oriented damage model, which supports multiple use cases, and the implementation of the model in a standard. Furthermore, the tests have shown that the standard is suitable to deliver damage information; however, several software programs lack proper implementation of the standard.}, subject = {Building Information Modeling}, language = {en} } @article{ArtusAlabassyKoch, author = {Artus, Mathias and Alabassy, Mohamed Said Helmy and Koch, Christian}, title = {A BIM Based Framework for Damage Segmentation, Modeling, and Visualization Using IFC}, series = {Applied Sciences}, volume = {2022}, journal = {Applied Sciences}, number = {volume 12, issue 6, article 2772}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, doi = {10.3390/app12062772}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220314-46059}, pages = {1 -- 24}, abstract = {Paper-based data acquisition and manual transfer between incompatible software or data formats during inspections of bridges, as done currently, are time-consuming, error-prone, cumbersome, and lead to information loss. A fully digitized workflow using open data formats would reduce data loss, efforts, and the costs of future inspections. On the one hand, existing studies proposed methods to automatize data acquisition and visualization for inspections. These studies lack an open standard to make the gathered data available for other processes. On the other hand, several studies discuss data structures for exchanging damage information among different stakeholders. However, those studies do not cover the process of automatic data acquisition and transfer. This study focuses on a framework that incorporates automatic damage data acquisition, transfer, and a damage information model for data exchange. This enables inspectors to use damage data for subsequent analyses and simulations. The proposed framework shows the potentials for a comprehensive damage information model and related (semi-)automatic data acquisition and processing.}, subject = {Building Information Modeling}, language = {en} }