@inproceedings{Schneider,
  author    = {Schneider, Tatjana},
  title     = {ARCHITECTURE FIDDLES WHILE THE WORLD BURNS},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3063},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30639},
  pages     = {9},
  abstract  = {Tatjana Schneider is lecturer at the School of Architecture, University of Sheffield. She holds a PhD in architecture. She worked in architectural practice in Germany and the UK, and has taught, lectured and published widely (including 'Flexible Housing' with Jeremy Till). She was a member of the worker's cooperative G.L.A.S. (Glasgow Letters on Architecture and Space), which undertook agit-prop works, educational workshops, community based design consultancy and produced the quarterly journal glaspaper. Her work focuses on the production and political economy of the built environment. Current work includes the research 'Spatial Agency'.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Homsi,
  author    = {Homsi, Eymen},
  title     = {GENUFLECTION AND EMPIRE},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3062},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30624},
  pages     = {15},
  abstract  = {Eymen Homsi has degrees in architecture from the Ohio State University and biology/botany from the University of Southern Colorado. He taught design and theory at the Ohio State University (1991-99), worked at the Atelier Jose Oubrerie (1991-1995), and was Director of Design at the Columbus Neighborhood Design Centre (1998-99), where he designed the Salvation Army Transitional Housing, Friends of the Homeless Dormitory, and other public projects. He established Studio Noni in Helsinki (2000-04) for experimental projects, speculative works, competitions. He was coordinator of Habitation Studio at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (2004-09). He returned to Istanbul in 2009 after an absence of thirty five years to teach studio at Mimar Sinan University of Fine Arts (2009-10). Currently he teaches studio at Istanbul Technical University, and theory at K{\"u}lt{\"u}r University. His research concerns the relationship between rites of worship in Islam and the space of the mosque.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Hoekstra,
  author    = {Hoekstra, Rixt},
  title     = {HOW CRITICAL IS CRITICALITY?},
  editor    = {Faschingeder, Kristian and Jormakka, Kari and Korrek, Norbert and Pfeifer, Olaf and Zimmermann, Gerd},
  publisher = {Verlag der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Weimar},
  organization    = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-86068-417-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3064},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170329-30648},
  pages     = {7},
  abstract  = {Rixt Hoekstra is an architectural historian and a Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin at the Leopold Franzens University of Innsbruck, where she teaches theory and history of architecture. Hoekstra studied architectural history in Groningen, the Netherlands, and received her PhD in architectural history in 2005. Her publications include: Building versus Bildung, Manfredo Tafuri and the construction of a historical discipline (2005) and Lost in Translation? Tafuri on Germany, Tafuri in Germany, a history of reception (2008). Currently, her research interests focus on the status of criticality in architecture in relationship to the legacy of the Venice School and on genderstudies in architecture.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-4620,
  title     = {Henry van de Velde and the total work of art},
  editor    = {Ruhl, Carsten},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4620},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220330-46201},
  publisher      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {33},
  abstract  = {Tagungsband des 12. Internationalen Bauhaus-Kolloquiums Weimar vom 04.-07.04.2013},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {mul}
}
@phdthesis{Faschingeder,
  author    = {Faschingeder, Kristian},
  title     = {Das Unheimliche in der Stadt. Die urbane Vision Ludwig Hilberseimers},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2133},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20140226-21333},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {454},
  abstract  = {Ausgangspunkt der Arbeit ist der Aspekt des Unheimlichen in jener Hochhausstadt, deren Entwurf Ludwig Hilberseimer 1924 zum ersten Mal publizierte und die sp{\"a}ter zum Synonym f{\"u}r die Aberrationen modernistischen St{\"a}dtebaus wurde. Daraus geht die Forschungsfrage hervor, wie der Eindruck des Unheimlichen evoziert wird und an welchen Elementen des Entwurfs und/oder der Darstellung dieser festgemacht werden kann. Hier geht es nicht um eine Analyse der Intentionen des Autors der Hochhausstadt, der diese ja als Verbesserung zu den herrschenden Wohnverh{\"a}ltnissen anpries; stattdessen wird eine Reihe von unterschiedlichen interpretatorischen Ans{\"a}tzen gew{\"a}hlt (von Nelson Goodmans Theorie der Notation {\"u}ber Norman Brysons visuelles Zeichensystem bis hin zu Adornos Negativer Dialektik; von der „Bildwissenschaft" bis hin zur „visual theory"). In diesem Zusammenhang werden schließlich auch jene Divergenzen herausgearbeitet, die zwischen der Architektur der Moderne und der Kunst der Avantgarde herrschten. Da aufgrund der Frage nach der Bildwirkung der beiden Perspektiven der Hochhausstadt die {\"A}sthetik des Erhabenen eine besondere Rolle spielt, reicht der Fokus der Arbeit bis in den kunst- und architekturtheoretischen Diskurs des 18. Jahrhundert zur{\"u}ck. Zuletzt m{\"u}ndet die Arbeit in eine Diskussion von Interpretation selbst und der M{\"o}glichkeit einer kritischen Architekturtheorie.},
  subject      = {Architekturtheorie},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{BlasiusBeenenBrandtetal.,
  author    = {Blasius, Clara Maria and Beenen, Paul and Brandt, Marvin and Bulic, Selma and Chen, Mu and Claus, Leon and Ellguth, Fabian and Elshani, Diellza and Hainich, Jakob and Kolbe, Simon and Oehler, Louis and Pullmann, Isabella and Ratz, Rosalie and Regueiro Candina, Andoni and Reusch, Marco and Thurow, Katharina and Weski, Lennart and Wittke, Katharina},
  title     = {TIRANA. Architecture as Political Actor},
  editor    = {Adam, Tobias and Kuch, Ulrike},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3995},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20191014-39951},
  publisher      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {This book on the architecture of Tirana contains findings of the interdisciplinary seminar "TIRANA. Architecture as Political Actor" at Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar. In photographs, texts and diagrams it shows the approach to an unknown city that was explored following the ideas of the Actor Network Theory (ANT). Thus, the book gives an insight into scientific as well as artistic works, both mirroring the attempt to grasp the role of architecture within political processes in the 20th century and today. In this compilation of the architectural-political networks, an image of the city of Tirana emerges that gives an idea of specific built structures as well as of the architecture as political actor on a meta-level. In doing so, the book itself becomes an actor in the discussion of the relationship of architecture and politics in Albania and an example for the use of ANT as scientific-artistic tool for the research on architectural "things" in the context of a city.},
  subject      = {Architektur},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Noeske,
  author    = {Noeske, Jannik},
  title     = {Campus Bockenheim Revisited},
  series = {sub\urban. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kritische Stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2019},
  journal   = {sub\urban. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kritische Stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 9, Nr. 3},
  publisher = {sub\urban e. V.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  doi       = {10.36900/suburban.v7i3.553},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220112-45583},
  pages     = {144 -- 150},
  abstract  = {J{\"u}rgen Schardt legt eine umfassende Studie zur Architektur der Stadt- und Universit{\"a}tsbauten in Frankfurt am Main von 1906 bis 1956 vor. Besonderer Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf den gesellschaftlichen und politischen Rahmenbedingungen der Architekturproduktion und einer kritischen Revision der etablierten Historiografie der Goethe-Universit{\"a}t. Der Autor widmet sich in drei Teilen jeweils dem Kaiserreich und der Gr{\"u}ndung der Hochschule im Jahr 1914, der Zeit der Weimarer Republik sowie der Jahre des Aufbaus nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Schardt untersucht die entstandenen Geb{\"a}ude hinsichtlich schl{\"u}ssiger Kriterien b{\"u}rgerlicher Architektur, beleuchtet aber auch andere f{\"u}r die Hochschulgeschichte relevante Rahmenbedingungen. Die lesenswerte Studie verbindet dabei Aspekte der Sozial-, Wissenschafts- und Architekturgeschichte.},
  subject      = {Frankfurt am Main},
  language  = {de}
}