@article{XinHijaziKoenigetal.,
  author    = {Xin, Li and Hijazi, Ihab Hamzi and K{\"o}nig, Reinhard and Lv, Zhihan and Zhong, Chen and Schmitt, Gerhard},
  title     = {Assessing Essential Qualities of Urban Space with Emotional and Visual Data Based on GIS Technique},
  series = {ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION},
  journal   = {ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijgi5110218},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20170401-30995},
  abstract  = {Finding a method to evaluate people's emotional responses to urban spaces in a valid and objective way is fundamentally important for urban design practices and related policy making. Analysis of the essential qualities of urban space could be made both more effective and more accurate using innovative information techniques that have become available in the era of big data. This study introduces an integrated method based on geographical information systems (GIS) and an emotion-tracking technique to quantify the relationship between people's emotional responses and urban space. This method can evaluate the degree to which people's emotional responses are influenced by multiple urban characteristics such as building shapes and textures, isovist parameters, visual entropy, and visual fractals. The results indicate that urban spaces may influence people's emotional responses through both spatial sequence arrangements and shifting scenario sequences. Emotional data were collected with body sensors and GPS devices. Spatial clustering was detected to target effective sampling locations; then, isovists were generated to extract building textures. Logistic regression and a receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to determine the key isovist parameters and the probabilities that they influenced people's emotion. Finally, based on the results, we make some suggestions for design professionals in the field of urban space optimization.},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wray2003,
  author    = {Wray, Tim},
  title     = {The queer gaze},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1267},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20080304-13356},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 24. bis 27. April 2003 in Weimar an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t zum Thema: ‚MediumArchitektur - Zur Krise der Vermittlung'},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Willenbacher2000,
  author    = {Willenbacher, Susanne},
  title     = {Untersuchungen zu r{\"a}umlichen Benutzerschnittstellen am Beispiel der Pr{\"a}sentation von Stadtinformationen},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.34},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20040218-363},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  year      = {2000},
  abstract  = {Schwerpunkt der Arbeit ist die Auseinandersetzung mit den M{\"o}glichkeiten und Grenzen der Desktop-VR als neue Generation der Benutzerschnittstellen. Besondere Bedeutung bei dieser Art des Interface-Designs kommt den Metaphern zu. Ein großer Teil der Arbeit besch{\"a}ftigt sich mit der Klassifikation, der Auswahl und dem Einsatz passender Metaphern unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung der in der Applikation darzustellenden Informationsinhalte. Aus der Kombination dieser beiden Merkmale (Art der Metapher, Informationsinhalt) ergeben sich vier verschiedene virtuelle Umgebungen, deren Eigenschaften und Besonderheiten konkretisiert und an Beispielen aus dem Anwendungsgebiet der Stadtinformationssysteme vorgestellt werden. Als praktischer Untersuchungsgegenstand dient das Anwendungsgebiet der Stadtinformationssysteme. Die theoretisch basierten Erkenntnisse und Schlußfolgerungen werden durch statistische Untersuchungen, in Form von Frageb{\"o}gen zu Stadtinformationssystemen, {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft und konkretisiert.},
  subject      = {Virtuelle Realit{\"a}t},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WelchGuerra,
  author    = {Welch Guerra, Max},
  title     = {Fach, Gesellschaft und Wissenschaft. Beitrag zur Debatte „Was ist Stadt? Was ist Kritik?"},
  series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 10, Nr. 1},
  publisher = {Sub\urban e.V.},
  address   = {Leipzig},
  doi       = {10.36900/suburban.v10i1.779},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220810-46855},
  pages     = {188 -- 190},
  abstract  = {Der Aufruf, die Begriffe Stadt und Kritik in das Zentrum einer Debatte zu stellen, bietet die große Chance, uns weit {\"u}ber begriffliche Kl{\"a}rungen unseres gemeinsamen Arbeitsgegenstands hinaus - die ja auch f{\"u}r sich selbst sehr fruchtbar sein k{\"o}nnen - {\"u}ber die Funktion zu verst{\"a}ndigen, die wir in der Gesellschaft aus{\"u}ben, wenn wir r{\"a}umliche Planung praktizieren, erforschen und lehren. Da in der Bundesrepublik nicht nur ein großer Bedarf, sondern auch eine betr{\"a}chtliche Nachfrage nach {\"o}ffentlicher Planung besteht und die planungsbezogenen Wissenschaften sich eines insgesamt stabilen institutionellen Standes erfreuen, laufen wir Gefahr, die gesellschaftspolitische Legitimation von Berufsfeld und Wissenschaft zu vernachl{\"a}ssigen, sie als gegeben zu behandeln. Wir m{\"u}ssen uns ja kaum rechtfertigen.},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Siegert2003,
  author    = {Siegert, Bernhard},
  title     = {(Nicht) Am Ort : zum Raster als Kulturtechnik},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1237},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20080227-13049},
  series    = {Thesis // Bauhaus-Universit{\~A}\it <Weimar> ; Jg. 49, 2003},
  number    = {Heft 3},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 24. bis 27. April 2003 in Weimar an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t zum Thema: ‚MediumArchitektur - Zur Krise der Vermittlung'},
  subject      = {Architektur},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Sassen2000,
  author    = {Sassen, Saskia},
  title     = {The global city : the de-nationalizing of time and space},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1214},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-12148},
  year      = {2000},
  abstract  = {Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 14. bis 16. Oktober 1999 in Weimar an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t zum Thema: ‚global village - Perspektiven der Architektur'},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RoskammVollmer,
  author    = {Roskamm, Nikolai and Vollmer, Lisa},
  title     = {Was ist Stadt? Was ist Kritik? Einf{\"u}hrung in die Debatte zum Jubil{\"a}umsheft von sub\urban},
  series = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  journal   = {sub\urban. zeitschrift f{\"u}r kritische stadtforschung},
  number    = {Band 10, Nr. 1,},
  publisher = {Sub\urban e.V.},
  address   = {Leipzig},
  doi       = {10.36900/suburban.v10i1.798},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220811-46847},
  pages     = {127 -- 130},
  abstract  = {Im Heft zum zehnj{\"a}hrigen Jubil{\"a}um von sub\urban mit dem Themenschwerpunkt „sub\x: Verortungen, Entortungen" ver{\"o}ffentlichen wir eine Debatte, die von den bisherigen in unserer Zeitschrift in dieser Rubrik gef{\"u}hrten textlichen Diskussionen abweicht. Im Vorfeld der Planungen f{\"u}r unsere Jubil{\"a}umsausgabe haben wir die aktuellen Mitglieder unseres wissenschaftlichen Beirats darum gebeten, zwei grundlegende Fragen von kritischer Stadtforschung in kurzen Beitr{\"a}gen zu diskutieren: Was ist Stadt? Was ist Kritik?},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Paetzold2000,
  author    = {Paetzold, Heinz},
  title     = {Zentrum, Peripherie, Zone, Globalisierung : Umrisse einer zeitgen{\"o}ssischen kritischen Philosophie der Stadtkultur},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1217},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-12177},
  year      = {2000},
  abstract  = {Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 14. bis 16. Oktober 1999 in Weimar an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t zum Thema: ‚global village - Perspektiven der Architektur'},
  subject      = {Stadt},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Morris1997,
  author    = {Morris, Marc},
  title     = {American images of Utopia},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1219},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20111215-12195},
  year      = {1997},
  abstract  = {Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium vom 27. - 30. Juni 1996 in Weimar an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t zum Thema: ‚ Techno-Fiction. Zur Kritik der technologischen Utopien'},
  subject      = {Celebration <Fla.>},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{MendoncadeAlmeida,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Mendon{\c{c}}a de Almeida, Karina},
  title     = {Why isn't Google welcome in Kreuzberg? Social movement and the effects of Internet on urban space},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4244},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200924-42446},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {132},
  abstract  = {Advances in information and communication technologies such as the Internet have driven a great transformation in the interactions between individuals and the urban environment. As the use of the Internet in cities becomes more intense and diverse, there is also a restructuring of urban space, which is experienced by groups in society in various ways, according to the specificity of each context. Accordingly, large Internet companies have emerged as new players in the processes of urbanization, either through partnerships with the public administration or through various services offered directly to urban residents. Once these corporations are key actors in the digitalization of urban services, their operations can affect the patterns of urban inequality and generate a series of new struggles over the production of space. Interested in analyzing this phenomena from the perspective of civil society, the present Master Thesis examined a social movement that prevented Google to settle a new startup campus in the district of Kreuzberg, in Berlin. By asking why Google was not welcome in that context, this study also sought to understand how internet, as well as its main operators, has affected everyday life in the city. Thus, besides analyzing the movement, I investigated the particularities of the urban context where it arose and the elements that distinguish the mobilization's opponent. In pursuit of an interdisciplinary approach, I analyzed and discussed the results of empirical research in dialogue with critical theories in the fields of urban studies and the Internet, with emphasis on Castells' definitions of urban social movements and network society (1983, 2009, 2015), Couldry's and Mejias' (2019) idea of data colonialism, Lef{\`e}bvre's (1991, 1996) concepts of abstract space and the right to the city, as well as Zuboff's (2019) theory of surveillance capitalism. The case at hand has exposed that Google plays a prominent role in the way the Internet has been developed and deployed in cities. From the perspective accessed, the current appropriation of Internet technologies has been detrimental to individual autonomy and has contributed to intensifying existing inequalities in the city. The alternative vision to this relies mainly on the promotion of decentralized solidarity networks.},
  subject      = {Soziale Bewegung},
  language  = {en}
}