@article{SimonRitz,
  author    = {Simon-Ritz, Frank},
  title     = {"Kultur ist Reichtum an Problemen": Wie sich der Kultur-Begriff der UNESCO an Egon Friedell ann{\"a}herte},
  series = {Palmbaum: Literarisches Journal aus Th{\"u}ringen},
  volume    = {2023},
  journal   = {Palmbaum: Literarisches Journal aus Th{\"u}ringen},
  number    = {Heft 1},
  publisher = {Quartus Verlag},
  address   = {Bucha bei Jena},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4952},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230411-49524},
  pages     = {4},
  abstract  = {Der in H. 1/2023 erschienene Essay f{\"u}hrt Gedanken einer in H. 1/2022 des "Palmbaum" erschienene Betrachtung (https://doi.org/10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4628) weiter. Im Zentrum stehen dabei die Bem{\"u}hungen der UNESCO um das immaterielle Kulturerbe.},
  subject      = {UNESCO},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-2696,
  title     = {Alles Heritage?},
  editor    = {Angermann, Kirsten and Engelberg-Dockal, Eva von and Warda, Johannes},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.2696},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20161110-26961},
  pages     = {86},
  abstract  = {Die Erweiterung des Denkmalbegriffs hat zu einer Expansion des Erinnerns, Sch{\"u}tzens, Bewahrens und Tradierens auf alle Bereiche des Lebens gef{\"u}hrt. Heute werden nicht nur Scheunen, Tankstellen und Großwohnsiedlungen als Teil des historischen Erbes unter Denkmalschutz gestellt, sondern auch kulturelle Praktiken und Br{\"a}uche zum „immateriellen" Weltkulturerbe erkl{\"a}rt. Die Folge dieser als „Denkmal-Inflation" kritisierten Entwicklung ist eine versch{\"a}rfte Konkurrenz um Aufmerksamkeit und finanzielle Zuwendungen. Letzteres spiegelt sich nicht zuletzt in einer zunehmenden, maßgeblich von der Tourismusindustrie gef{\"o}rderten publikumswirksamen Inszenierung des Erbes. Im Zeitalter der „Heritage Industry" (Robert Hewison, 1987) bilden Kulturg{\"u}ter aber nicht nur einen wichtigen Standortfaktor, sondern wird das „Erbe" selbst zunehmend mittels internationaler Charten, Deklarationen, Plaketten und Social Media-Kampagnen konstruiert. Dies geschieht vorwiegend innerhalb eines anglophonen Diskurses, der aber an die deutschsprachigen begriffs- und ideengeschichtlich gepr{\"a}gten Diskussionen strenggenommen nicht anschlussf{\"a}hig ist. Dort l{\"a}sst sich ein - in einem {\"a}hnlichen Sinne umfassend zu nennender - Erbe-Begriff zwar bereits f{\"u}r die Heimatschutzbewegung konstatieren, eine fachlich ausdifferenzierte Denkmalpflege, wie wir sie heute kennen, tut sich jedoch schwer, ein solches universelles Konzept zu integrieren. W{\"a}hrend die „Heritagisierung" durch internationale Organisationen zu einer Verschiebung des Fokus von Baudenkmalen hin zur allgemeinen Bewahrung von Kulturerbe f{\"u}hrt (das immaterielle eingeschlossen, siehe etwa die Burra Charter), bleibt der Denkmal- und Erbe-Diskurs in den deutschsprachigen L{\"a}ndern bislang klar auf Baudenkmale und st{\"a}dtebauliche Ensembles konzentriert. Letzteres zeigt sich auch im Vorfeld des European Cultural Heritage Year 2018, das in Deutschland im Gegensatz zu anderen europ{\"a}ischen L{\"a}ndern maßgeblich von Denkmalschutzorganisationen getragen wird. Die Wende hin zum Heritage l{\"a}sst sich gleichermaßen bei neuen Forschungsfeldern und Ausbildungswegen der Denkmalpflege beobachten. So werden heute „Heritage Tourism" und „Dark Heritage" als spezifische Formen der „Denkmalnutzung" untersucht und bilden - in Erg{\"a}nzung zu den klassischen Disziplinen Kunstgeschichte, Architektur und Planung - „Heritage Management" und „Heritage Studies" grundst{\"a}ndige Studieng{\"a}nge. Letzteres gilt inzwischen auch f{\"u}r die deutschsprachigen L{\"a}nder. Der Weg f{\"u}hrt damit weg von der spezialisierten Kennerschaft zum Allrounder mit neuen Schwerpunkten auf Marketing, Verwaltung und Vermittlung. Mit Blick auf sozio-kulturelle Entwicklungen erweist sich, dass der Heritage-Begriff vor allem im {\"o}konomischen und politischen Diskurs weitgehend affirmativ gebraucht wird. Heritage geht demnach mit einem gewissen moralischen wie missionarischen Impetus einher, verbunden mit einer (Kultur-)Politik der „Identit{\"a}tsstiftung". In Zeiten, in denen „Identit{\"a}t" wieder als politisches Schlagwort im gesellschaftlichen Diskurs fungiert, scheint es um so wichtiger, die wissenschaftliche Besch{\"a}ftigung mit Heritage, die zugrunde liegenden begrifflichen Konzepte und pr{\"a}skriptiven Programme, kritisch zu reflektieren.},
  subject      = {Kulturerbe},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Wieneke2009,
  author    = {Wieneke, Lars},
  title     = {An analysis of productive user contributions in digital media applications for museums and cultural heritage.},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1442},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20101214-15285},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {In a historical perspective, the relationship between digital media and the museum environment is marked by the role of museums as example use cases for the appli- cation of digital media. Today, this exceptional use as an often technology oriented application has changed and instead digital media have turned into an integral part of mediation strategies in the museum environment. Alongside with this shift not only an increasing professionalization of application development but also a grow- ing demand for new content can be observed. Comparable to its role as the main cost factor in the media industry, the production of content rises to a challenge for museums. In particular small and medium scale european museums with limited funding and an often low level of staff coverage face this new demand and strive therefore for alternative production resources. While productive user contributions can be seen as such an alternative resource, user contributions are at the same time a manifestation for a different mode of in- teracting with content. In contrast to the dominantly passive role of audiences as re- ceivers of information, productive contributions emerge as a mode of content ex- ploration and become in this regard influential for museum mediation strategies. As applications of user contributions in museums and cultural heritage are currently rather seldom, a broader perspective towards user contributions becomes necessary to understand its specific challenges, opportunities and limitations. Productive user contributions can be found in a growing number of applications on the Internet where they either complement or fully substitute corporate content production processes. While the Wikipedia1, an online encyclopedia written entirely by a group of users and open to contributions by all its users, is one of the most prominent examples for this practice, several more applications emerged or are be- ing developed. In consequence user contributions are about to become a powerful source for the production of content in digital media environments.},
  subject      = {Neue Medien},
  language  = {en}
}
@periodical{AinioBartetzkyGyőrffyetal.,
  author    = {Ainio, Anna and Bartetzky, Arnold and Győrffy, Rachel and Islam, Naslima and Khvadagiani, Irakli and Kibel, Jochen and Landau-Donnelly, Friederike and Leko, Kristina and Lenz, Patricia and Onuoha, Nnenna and Rathjen, Lukas and Reinsch, Natalie and Rykov, Anatol and Tajeri, Niloufar and Ullmanov{\´a}, Kl{\´a}ra},
  title     = {Censored? Conflicted Concepts of Cultural Heritage},
  editor    = {Din{\c{c}}{\c{c}}ağ Kahveci, Ay{\c{s}}eg{\"u}l and Hajdu, Marcell and H{\"o}hne, Wolfram and Jesse, Darja and Karpf, Michael and Torres Ruiz, Marta},
  publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag},
  address   = {Weimar},
  isbn      = {978-3-95773-304-7},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4927},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230213-49276},
  pages     = {181},
  abstract  = {Those who ask how social entities relate to the past, enter a field defined by competing interpretations and contested practices of a collectively shared heritage. Dissent and conflict among heritage communities represent productive moments in the negotiation of these varying constructs of the past, identities, and heritage. At the same time, they lead to omissions, the overwriting and amendment of existing constructs. A closer look at all that is suppressed, excluded or rejected opens up new perspectives: It reveals how social groups are formed through public disputes upon the material foundations of heritage constructs. Taking the concept of censorship, the volume engages with the exclusionary and inclusionary mechanisms that underlie the construction of heritage and thus social identities. Censorship is understood here as a discursive strategy in public debates. In current debates, allegations of censorship surface primarily in cases where the handling of a certain heritage constructs is subjected to critical evaluation, or on the contrary, needs to be protected from criticism or even destruction. The authors trace the connection between heritage and identity and show that identity constructs are not only manifested within heritage but are actively negotiated through it.},
  subject      = {Kulturerbe},
  language  = {en}
}
@periodical{DolffBonekaemperPaulusSellmannetal.,
  author    = {Dolff-Bonek{\"a}mper, Gabi and Paulus, J{\"o}rg and Sellmann, Annika and Vogel, Carolin and Bargholz, Ortrun and Herrmann, Moritz Peter and L{\"o}ffler, Beate and Kretschmann, Schirin and Lotter, Stefanie and Ehrenpreis, David and Bockelmann, Leo and Langner, Sigrun and Sch{\"o}nberger, Sonya and Majdzadeh, Bahar},
  title     = {Collecting Loss},
  editor    = {Bogner, Simone and Dolff-Bonek{\"a}mper, Gabi and Meier, Hans-Rudolf},
  publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag},
  address   = {Ilmtal-Weinstraße},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4321},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201221-43217},
  pages     = {168},
  abstract  = {Wer sich mit "Identit{\"a}t" und "Erbe" befasst, also mit dem Zusammenhang zwischen der Konstituierung und Stabilit{\"a}t von Gemeinwesen und dem Bewahren von G{\"u}tern, Orten und {\"U}berlieferungen, kommt nicht umhin, sich auch mit Verlusten zu befassen. Verlust bezeichnet hier nicht die Abwesenheit eines Gutes, das Erbe war oder h{\"a}tte werden k{\"o}nnen, sondern die soziale Beziehung zu dem verlorenen Gut und zu den Umst{\"a}nden seines Verlorengehens oder auch den Versuchen, es wiederzugewinnen.},
  subject      = {Verlust},
  language  = {mul}
}
@phdthesis{Bleichner2008,
  author    = {Bleichner, Stephan M.},
  title     = {Das elektronisch virtualisierte Baudenkmal},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.1352},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20080930-14261},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Die elektronische Virtualisierung von Baudenkmalen ist neues, außergew{\"o}hnlich vielf{\"a}ltiges medientechnisches Ph{\"a}nomen; es beschreibt die urspr{\"u}ngliche Form substanziell-realer Baudenkmale, transformiert sie von einer abstrakten Beschreibung in Wort und Bild in eine immaterielle Realit{\"a}t. Die Dissertation versucht Antworten zu geben auf folgende Fragen: Ist die elektronische Virtualisierung eine Methode der Stimulation der {\"O}ffentlichkeit im Umgang mit Baudenkmalen? Ist das elektronisch virtualisierte Baudenkmal ein immaterielles Zeugnis der Kulturgeschichte in der Zukunft? Ist das substanziell-reale und das virtualisierte Baudenkmal uneingeschr{\"a}nkt gegenseitig austauschbar, ist ersteres durch letzteres ersetzbar? Die Beantwortung der Fragen h{\"a}ngt ab von den Stufen der Perfektion der elektronischen Virtualsierung von Baudenkmalen.},
  subject      = {Baudenkmal},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Elrasoul,
  author    = {Elrasoul, Riham},
  title     = {Designing Urban National Memory},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4048},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20191212-40489},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  abstract  = {The study of memory, architecture, and urban space has been the interest ‎of ‎researchers ‎from the diverse fields around the world due to, the significance of dealing ‎with ‎memories ‎especially after the tragedy of the Second World War. Nations in Europe has chosen ‎not to ‎neglect ‎their past, moreover, overcoming it by strengthening the national identity. An ‎approach was clear in ‎the literature, art, further in the way of rebuilding their cities; that mainly ‎has reflected on the ‎value of urban spaces and their role in narrating the country's national ‎memory. Thanks to this ‎approach, which has supported the post-war European nations to invite ‎to an act of ‎ forgiveness rather than to forget. ‎ On the contrary, memory, in relation to architecture is a form of knowledge has been ‎neglected in Egypt, especially during the previous decades after the declaration of independence ‎from the colonial power, and since 1952 revolution. Recently, a rising debate about Egypt ‎national history and the need to renationalize the Egyptian historical consciousness has rapidly ‎grown up, due to the political transformation has occurred because of the 25th uprising, 2011, ‎which unveiled the power of public spaces in constituting the nation thoughts, especially Tahrir ‎square.‎ At the same time, this has unveiled the results of neglecting the past instead of overcoming it; unveiled a present carries the danger of conflict and repeating previous mistakes. Researchers, historians, politicians, governmental organization, have ‎worked in the purpose of revisiting the historical information, and have tried to document the ‎current transformation of the 25th uprising. There was a public demand for redesigning Tahrir square to reflect the ‎memory of the uprising as a symbol of the power of the public. However, after eight years, those ‎memories have faded as if the 25th uprising has never happened. ‎ Those circumstances are very relevant to the gap between urban design and the art of ‎memory-work, in the scientific field. Few studies in Egypt conducted the concept of memory in ‎relation to urban spaces, however, the matter requires more attention, to associate the need for renationalizing Egypt ‎memory, with viewing urban space as a mean of narrating the country's national memory and ‎reflecting the citizens' current thoughts, as a try of nearing the distances between ‎competing ‎narratives. Therefore, the research aims at developing a methodological framework that should ‎contribute to renationalizing memory through urban space. Further, benefiting from the German experience by investigating lessons to learn. That is based on the hypothesis that, although there is no fixed formula for all countries to renationalize the historical ‎consciousness of memory through urban spaces, lessons to be learned from Germany experience ‎could be a driving dimension when designing Egyptian urban spaces with a concept of memory ‎as an essential factor. To guide the validity of the study's hypothesis, a set of research questions are thus ‎formulated: Starting from why memory is an essential factor when designing urban spaces? ‎Regarding Egypt national memory, how it was constituted through history and how to read its ‎representation on urban spaces? Also, the study quests the means of nationalizing memory ‎through urban spaces? And What are the learned lessons from the German experience?‎ The study tries to answer those questions. Via an inductive ‎analytical ‎methodology ‎which ‎moves from the gap of knowledge and from a particular situation ‎in Egypt, to study the German ‎experience in renationalizing the concept of memory through urban spaces.‎ ‎ Within the scope of the study, exploring Egypt prevailing narratives and the inherited ‎concepts which influenced the national memory is essential. Moreover, the research develops ‎analytical political psychosocial model that could help reading memories in urban spaces, ‎memory's actors, and memory influences. To validate this model, case studies are analysed in ‎light of the concluded aspects. Consequently, the expected result is to infer broad general ‎learned ‎lessons for the Egyptian case. ‎ Research findings and conclusions answer the research questions, interpret literature ‎review, recommend some guide points to three target groups: first, practice field; to encourage ‎designers to value the national and collective memories when designing urban spaces. Second, to ‎ask policymakers to take the public participation into consideration, when taking decisions related to urban ‎development. Third, the thesis recommends future researches of urban memory that connect ‎theoretical information with the practice field. ‎ Finally, enhancing the memory-work in relation to the national narrative, conveying a meaningful message, when ‎designing urban spaces could encourage citizens to learn, to interact, and to dissolve boundaries ‎between the competing narratives in post-conflict societies.‎},
  subject      = {Erinnerung},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Steiner,
  author    = {Steiner, Marion},
  title     = {Die chilenische Steckdose. Kleine Weltgeschichte der deutschen Elektrifizierung von Valpara{\´i}so und Santiago, 1880-1920},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3925},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20190517-39257},
  school      = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  pages     = {507, 155},
  abstract  = {Am Beispiel der Elektrifizierung zweier Großst{\"a}dte an der Westk{\"u}ste S{\"u}damerikas zeigt die Arbeit den globalen Einfluss deutscher Industrie- und Finanzakteure auf technische, st{\"a}dtebauliche und gesellschaftlich-kulturelle Entwicklungen zur Bl{\"u}tezeit des europ{\"a}ischen Imperialismus auf. Damit werden die Regionalgeschichten der chilenischen Hauptstadtregion und der Elektropolis Berlin zu einer Globalgeschichte miteinander verkn{\"u}pft. Ein Hauptaugenmerk der Analyse liegt dabei auf den weltweiten Akteursnetzwerken und Machtverh{\"a}ltnissen sowie dem kulturellen Erbe und seiner gegenw{\"a}rtigen Interpretation.},
  subject      = {Weltgeschichte},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{RoseltHuberKiesslingetal.,
  author    = {Roselt, Sabine and Huber, Sophie and Kießling, Josepha and Neumeier, Lolina and Bahr, Linus},
  title     = {From Tradition to Television - Diverse Perspectives on Afghan Music},
  editor    = {Lell, Peter},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4368},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210510-43682},
  publisher      = {Hochschule f{\"u}r Musik FRANZ LISZT},
  pages     = {51},
  abstract  = {What is Afghan music and what is its contemporary state? This question seems important to ask, considering the conflictual recent past of the country that particularly affected cultural expressions such as music. In these four articles diverse perspectives on Afghan music are explored. From traditional music of the Afghan rubab and its masters up to popular music of the Afghan-German hiphop producer "Farhot", various insights are given into phenomena yet barely covered in academic works. This collection provides glimpses into the variety of the music of Afghanistan and the Afghan diaspora and help to shape the Western views on the music of the country into more diverse perspectives. We move further away from the bias of the majority of media representations predominantly showing the conflictual sides of Afghanistan, at the same time avoiding a limiting and narrow view on Afghanistan with solely a musical tradition located in the past. These essays go beyond and outline that apart from a rich tradition, there are present forms of musical expression. We move from "Tradition to Television" and beyond, exploring views on the future of music connected to Afghanistan.},
  subject      = {Musik},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Speitkamp,
  author    = {Speitkamp, Winfried},
  title     = {Identit{\"a}t durch Erbe? Historische Jubil{\"a}en und Jahrestage in der Erinnerungskultur},
  doi       = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.3646},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20171130-36467},
  abstract  = {Vortrag, gehalten am 13.12.2016 im Rahmen der Ringvorlesung des Graduiertenkollegs "Identit{\"a}t und Erbe" an der Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar},
  subject      = {Kulturerbe},
  language  = {de}
}