@periodical{AinioBartetzkyGyőrffyetal., author = {Ainio, Anna and Bartetzky, Arnold and Győrffy, Rachel and Islam, Naslima and Khvadagiani, Irakli and Kibel, Jochen and Landau-Donnelly, Friederike and Leko, Kristina and Lenz, Patricia and Onuoha, Nnenna and Rathjen, Lukas and Reinsch, Natalie and Rykov, Anatol and Tajeri, Niloufar and Ullmanov{\´a}, Kl{\´a}ra}, title = {Censored? Conflicted Concepts of Cultural Heritage}, editor = {Din{\c{c}}{\c{c}}ağ Kahveci, Ay{\c{s}}eg{\"u}l and Hajdu, Marcell and H{\"o}hne, Wolfram and Jesse, Darja and Karpf, Michael and Torres Ruiz, Marta}, publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag}, address = {Weimar}, isbn = {978-3-95773-304-7}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4927}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230213-49276}, pages = {181}, abstract = {Those who ask how social entities relate to the past, enter a field defined by competing interpretations and contested practices of a collectively shared heritage. Dissent and conflict among heritage communities represent productive moments in the negotiation of these varying constructs of the past, identities, and heritage. At the same time, they lead to omissions, the overwriting and amendment of existing constructs. A closer look at all that is suppressed, excluded or rejected opens up new perspectives: It reveals how social groups are formed through public disputes upon the material foundations of heritage constructs. Taking the concept of censorship, the volume engages with the exclusionary and inclusionary mechanisms that underlie the construction of heritage and thus social identities. Censorship is understood here as a discursive strategy in public debates. In current debates, allegations of censorship surface primarily in cases where the handling of a certain heritage constructs is subjected to critical evaluation, or on the contrary, needs to be protected from criticism or even destruction. The authors trace the connection between heritage and identity and show that identity constructs are not only manifested within heritage but are actively negotiated through it.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {en} } @article{EckardtAlSadaty, author = {Eckardt, Frank and AlSadaty, Aliaa}, title = {Urban Heritage in Transformation: Physical and Non-Physical Dimensions of Changing Contexts}, series = {Urban Planning}, volume = {2023}, journal = {Urban Planning}, number = {Volume 8, No. 1}, publisher = {Cogitatio Press}, address = {Lissabon}, doi = {10.17645/up.v8i1.6633}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230524-63850}, pages = {4}, abstract = {Urban heritage is at the core of the process of many changes observable in the cities today. The pace of urban change in heritage contexts, however, differs widely across the globe. In some areas, it goes slowly, in others it is astonishingly rapid. In some cases, change is coupled with risks of erosion of heritage and urban areas of value and in others change is synonymous with prosperity and positive impacts. Change in urban heritage areas is not only confined to the physical and tangible aspects, but needs to be regarded as mirroring changes related socio-political practices, economic implications, and cultural impacts. In this regard, the present thematic issue looks at various patterns of the interrelationship between heritage and urban change from both the physical and the non-physical perspectives. This editorial presents the topic of urban heritage and patterns of physical and non-physical transformation in urban heritage contexts and introduces the thematic issue "Urban Heritage and Patterns of Change: Spatial Practices of Physical and Non-Physical Transformation."}, subject = {Stadt}, language = {en} } @article{SimonRitz, author = {Simon-Ritz, Frank}, title = {"Kultur ist Reichtum an Problemen": Wie sich der Kultur-Begriff der UNESCO an Egon Friedell ann{\"a}herte}, series = {Palmbaum: Literarisches Journal aus Th{\"u}ringen}, volume = {2023}, journal = {Palmbaum: Literarisches Journal aus Th{\"u}ringen}, number = {Heft 1}, publisher = {Quartus Verlag}, address = {Bucha bei Jena}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4952}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20230411-49524}, pages = {4}, abstract = {Der in H. 1/2023 erschienene Essay f{\"u}hrt Gedanken einer in H. 1/2022 des "Palmbaum" erschienene Betrachtung (https://doi.org/10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4628) weiter. Im Zentrum stehen dabei die Bem{\"u}hungen der UNESCO um das immaterielle Kulturerbe.}, subject = {UNESCO}, language = {de} } @periodical{BognerKarpfWilleretal., author = {Bogner, Simone and Karpf, Michael and Willer, Stefan and Aquilar, Giorgia and Springer, J{\"o}rg and Euler-Rolle, Bernd and Sikiaridi, Elizabeth and Vogelaar, Frans and von Beckerath, Verena and Klei, Alexandra and Raheem, Oluwafunminiyi and Grundig, Ronny and Sezer, {\"O}zge and Kutkina, Anna and Manka, Inge and Hettchen, Karolina and J{\"u}ttner, Monique and Blunk, Julian}, title = {Praktiken des Erbens. Metaphern, Materialisierungen, Machtkonstellationen}, editor = {Bogner, Simone and Karpf, Michael and Meier, Hans-Rudolf}, publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag}, address = {Weinstraße-Ilmtal}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4702}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20220810-47025}, abstract = {Ausgehend von der Bemerkung des Philosophen Jacques Derrida, dass Erbe immer auch eine Aufgabe sei, widmet sich der dritte Band der Schriftenreihe des Graduiertenkollegs „Identit{\"a}t und Erbe" den sozialen und kulturellen Praktiken der Bezugnahme auf Vergangenheit(en) und Identit{\"a}t(en). Mit einem (kulturellen) Erbe soll und muss etwas getan werden, um es {\"u}berhaupt hervorzubringen. Es konstituiert sich erst im Akt des (Nicht-)Erbens, das heißt im Wechselverh{\"a}ltnis mit den mit und an ihm ausgef{\"u}hrten Praktiken. Gleichwohl erm{\"o}glicht erst deren Verbindung mit den materiellen {\"U}berresten und {\"U}berlieferungen des Erbes eine Aneignung oder Ablehnung der Vergangenheit sowie die Fort- und Umschreibung eines bereits bestehenden Erbes. Diese Vorg{\"a}nge sind nicht willk{\"u}rlicher Natur: Die M{\"o}glichkeiten zur Interpretation und Deutung werden durch die sozialen, politischen, kulturellen, {\"o}konomischen und technischen Bedingungen der Gegenwart sowie durch die Geschichte und Materialit{\"a}t des Erbes beschr{\"a}nkt, erweitert und gelenkt. Erbe und Erbeprozesse m{\"u}ssen deshalb notwendigerweise miteinander in Beziehung gesetzt werden. Mit Beitr{\"a}gen von Simone Bogner und Michael Karpf, Stefan Willer, Giorgia Aquilar, J{\"o}rg Springer, Bernd Euler-Rolle, Elizabeth Sikiaridi und Frans Vogelaar, Verena von Beckerath, Alexandra Klei, Oluwafunminiyi Raheem, Ronny Grundig, {\"O}zge Sezer, Anna Kutkina, Inge Manka, Karolina Hettchen und Monique J{\"u}ttner sowie Julian Blunk.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Bockelmann, author = {Bockelmann, Leo}, title = {Zeit, dass sich was dreht. Windenergieanlagen aus denkmalkundlicher Perspektive}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4543}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20211210-45439}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, pages = {233}, abstract = {Knapp 30.000 Windenergieanlagen zwischen Nordsee und Alpen lassen un{\"u}bersehbar erkennen, dass sich unser Energiesystem in einer umfassenden Transformation befindet. Allenthalben erf{\"a}hrt diese Entwicklung eine breite und kontroverse Rezeption und auch in der Denkmalpflege werden Windenergieanlagen aufgrund ihrer mitunter erheblichen Auswirkungen auf die Landschaft noch {\"u}berwiegend als St{\"o}rung wahrgenommen. Diese Arbeit nimmt dagegen die historische Entwicklung in den Blick und pl{\"a}diert daf{\"u}r, Windenergieanlagen als bedeutendes Kulturerbe zu verstehen. Angesichts des Voranschreitens der Energiewende wird angenommen, dass gerade {\"a}lteren Modellen als baulichen Zeugnissen umfangreicher energiepolitischer Ver{\"a}nderungen seit den 1970er Jahren eine hohe Bedeutung zugeschrieben werden kann. Daher besteht das Ziel darin, Windenergieanlagen herauszuarbeiten, welche als hervorragende Zeugnisse der Entwicklung der Windenergienutzung in Deutschland zu bewerten sind. Zur Ann{\"a}herung werden diese zun{\"a}chst als Untersuchungsgegenstand typologisch abgegrenzt. Eine wesentliche Besonderheit von Windenergieanlagen besteht darin, dass sie im Verh{\"a}ltnis zur eigentlichen Fl{\"a}chenversiegelung durch ihre vertikale Struktur erhebliche visuelle Auswirkungen auf die Landschaft haben. Anschließend wird die Entwicklung der Windenergienutzung seit den 1970er Jahren genauer betrachtet, welche insgesamt nicht linear verlief und von vielen Konflikten gekennzeichnet ist. Diese muss im Kontext eines wachsenden Umweltbewusstseins verstanden werden, das umfangreiche energiepolitische Ver{\"a}nderungen zur Folge hatte. Auf dieser Grundlage werden schließlich in einer denkmalkundlichen Reihenuntersuchung Windenergieanlagen herausgearbeitet, welche in hervorragender Weise von der Entwicklung zeugen. Die Auswahl bleibt allerdings mit sechs Objekten im Verh{\"a}ltnis zum Gesamtbestand von knapp 30.000 Anlagen relativ beschr{\"a}nkt, weil das auf die Abgrenzung von Besonderheiten ausgelegte etablierte Denkmalverst{\"a}ndnis bei einem zeitlich so dichten Bestand gleichartiger Bauwerke an eine Grenze kommt. Abschließend werden m{\"o}gliche Erhaltungsperspektiven sowie denkmaltheoretische und -praktische Schlussfolgerungen diskutiert. Dabei ist unbedingt ein Erhalt am Ursprungsstandort anzustreben, wobei im Einzelfall entschieden werden muss, ob Belange des Funktions- oder Substanzerhaltes h{\"o}her zu gewichten sind. Die skizzierten Auswahlprobleme regen dar{\"u}ber hinaus zur Diskussion zus{\"a}tzlicher denkbarer Bewertungskategorien an, wobei sich insbesondere die gesellschaftliche Wahrnehmung und {\"o}kologische Werte aufdr{\"a}ngen. Zudem kann f{\"u}r die st{\"a}rkere Ber{\"u}cksichtigung von Funktionszusammenh{\"a}ngen bei der Betrachtung technischer Infrastruktur in der Denkmalpflege pl{\"a}diert werden. Insgesamt f{\"u}hrt die denkmalkundliche Auseinandersetzung mit Windenergieanlagen damit weit {\"u}ber die Herausarbeitung einzelner Objekte hinaus und macht eindr{\"u}cklich auf aktuelle Herausforderungen der Denkmalpflege und dar{\"u}ber hinaus aufmerksam.}, subject = {Industriekultur}, language = {de} } @book{RoseltHuberKiesslingetal., author = {Roselt, Sabine and Huber, Sophie and Kießling, Josepha and Neumeier, Lolina and Bahr, Linus}, title = {From Tradition to Television - Diverse Perspectives on Afghan Music}, editor = {Lell, Peter}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4368}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210510-43682}, publisher = {Hochschule f{\"u}r Musik FRANZ LISZT}, pages = {51}, abstract = {What is Afghan music and what is its contemporary state? This question seems important to ask, considering the conflictual recent past of the country that particularly affected cultural expressions such as music. In these four articles diverse perspectives on Afghan music are explored. From traditional music of the Afghan rubab and its masters up to popular music of the Afghan-German hiphop producer "Farhot", various insights are given into phenomena yet barely covered in academic works. This collection provides glimpses into the variety of the music of Afghanistan and the Afghan diaspora and help to shape the Western views on the music of the country into more diverse perspectives. We move further away from the bias of the majority of media representations predominantly showing the conflictual sides of Afghanistan, at the same time avoiding a limiting and narrow view on Afghanistan with solely a musical tradition located in the past. These essays go beyond and outline that apart from a rich tradition, there are present forms of musical expression. We move from "Tradition to Television" and beyond, exploring views on the future of music connected to Afghanistan.}, subject = {Musik}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Arzmi, author = {Arzmi, Azmah}, title = {Reinterpreting Marzahn, Berlin \& Petržalka, Bratislava: From Process of State Socialist Utopia to Utopia of State Capitalist Process}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4392}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20210315-43927}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {Housing estates were fundamentally conceived upon state socialist utopia ideas to provide standard housing for citizens. While former state socialist housing estates have been extensively researched in the field of architecture, urban and sociology studies, there is still a gap in identifying how production processes affect morphological changes during the post-socialist era. This thesis compares the processes in the production of the largest housing estates of Marzahn in GDR and Petržalka in Czechoslovakia from 1970 to 1989 through contextual analysis of primary and secondary sources, which include visual maps, diagrams from professional architecture and planning journals, government documents and textbooks, as well as academic journals, books and newspaper articles. Then it discusses how these processes inadvertently created conducive conditions affecting their development in the market economy after 1989. It then interprets the results through application of Actor-Network Theory and Historical Institutionalism, while conceptualising them through David Harvey's dialectical utopianism theory. Harvey (2000) delineates two types of utopia, one of spatial form and one of process. The former refers to materialised ideals in physical forms whereas the latter refers to the ongoing process of spatializing. The thesis aims to show how the production of Marzahn in GDR was more path dependent on policies established in 1950s and 1960s whereas Petržalka was a product of new Czechoslovakian policies in 1970s, changing aspects of the urban planning process, a manifestation of a more emphatic technocratic thinking on a wider scale. This ultimately influences the trajectories of development after 1989, showing more effects in Petržalka.}, subject = {Kulturerbe}, language = {en} } @periodical{DolffBonekaemperPaulusSellmannetal., author = {Dolff-Bonek{\"a}mper, Gabi and Paulus, J{\"o}rg and Sellmann, Annika and Vogel, Carolin and Bargholz, Ortrun and Herrmann, Moritz Peter and L{\"o}ffler, Beate and Kretschmann, Schirin and Lotter, Stefanie and Ehrenpreis, David and Bockelmann, Leo and Langner, Sigrun and Sch{\"o}nberger, Sonya and Majdzadeh, Bahar}, title = {Collecting Loss}, editor = {Bogner, Simone and Dolff-Bonek{\"a}mper, Gabi and Meier, Hans-Rudolf}, publisher = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}tsverlag}, address = {Ilmtal-Weinstraße}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4321}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20201221-43217}, pages = {168}, abstract = {Wer sich mit "Identit{\"a}t" und "Erbe" befasst, also mit dem Zusammenhang zwischen der Konstituierung und Stabilit{\"a}t von Gemeinwesen und dem Bewahren von G{\"u}tern, Orten und {\"U}berlieferungen, kommt nicht umhin, sich auch mit Verlusten zu befassen. Verlust bezeichnet hier nicht die Abwesenheit eines Gutes, das Erbe war oder h{\"a}tte werden k{\"o}nnen, sondern die soziale Beziehung zu dem verlorenen Gut und zu den Umst{\"a}nden seines Verlorengehens oder auch den Versuchen, es wiederzugewinnen.}, subject = {Verlust}, language = {mul} } @book{deOliveiraPinto, author = {de Oliveira Pinto, Tiago}, title = {Music as living heritage}, publisher = {Edition EMVAS}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-9817865-2-1}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4071}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20200123-40713}, publisher = {Hochschule f{\"u}r Musik FRANZ LISZT}, pages = {211}, abstract = {What is cultural heritage, and why has it received so much public interest in recent years? Almost three decades after the World Organization UNESCO defined and established international recognition of Cultural and Natural Heritage sites and devised ways of protecting them, a completely new approach to cultural heritage emerged with the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage in 2003. This global agreement for the maintenance, protection and dissemination of cultural manifestations and achievements that are not tangible objects or immobile monuments, like previous items classified as World Heritage, was a remarkable milestone of international cultural politics. This new understanding of cultural heritage owes much to representatives from Asian, African, and Latin American countries. In fact, just a few years after the promulgation of the 2003 Convention, the world cultural heritage map had already lost much of its European predominance. Asian countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, and India very soon showed up with lists of manifestations of their centenary (in some cases even millenary) national cultural heritages.}, subject = {Musik}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Elrasoul, author = {Elrasoul, Riham}, title = {Designing Urban National Memory}, doi = {10.25643/bauhaus-universitaet.4048}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:wim2-20191212-40489}, school = {Bauhaus-Universit{\"a}t Weimar}, abstract = {The study of memory, architecture, and urban space has been the interest ‎of ‎researchers ‎from the diverse fields around the world due to, the significance of dealing ‎with ‎memories ‎especially after the tragedy of the Second World War. Nations in Europe has chosen ‎not to ‎neglect ‎their past, moreover, overcoming it by strengthening the national identity. An ‎approach was clear in ‎the literature, art, further in the way of rebuilding their cities; that mainly ‎has reflected on the ‎value of urban spaces and their role in narrating the country's national ‎memory. Thanks to this ‎approach, which has supported the post-war European nations to invite ‎to an act of ‎ forgiveness rather than to forget. ‎ On the contrary, memory, in relation to architecture is a form of knowledge has been ‎neglected in Egypt, especially during the previous decades after the declaration of independence ‎from the colonial power, and since 1952 revolution. Recently, a rising debate about Egypt ‎national history and the need to renationalize the Egyptian historical consciousness has rapidly ‎grown up, due to the political transformation has occurred because of the 25th uprising, 2011, ‎which unveiled the power of public spaces in constituting the nation thoughts, especially Tahrir ‎square.‎ At the same time, this has unveiled the results of neglecting the past instead of overcoming it; unveiled a present carries the danger of conflict and repeating previous mistakes. Researchers, historians, politicians, governmental organization, have ‎worked in the purpose of revisiting the historical information, and have tried to document the ‎current transformation of the 25th uprising. There was a public demand for redesigning Tahrir square to reflect the ‎memory of the uprising as a symbol of the power of the public. However, after eight years, those ‎memories have faded as if the 25th uprising has never happened. ‎ Those circumstances are very relevant to the gap between urban design and the art of ‎memory-work, in the scientific field. Few studies in Egypt conducted the concept of memory in ‎relation to urban spaces, however, the matter requires more attention, to associate the need for renationalizing Egypt ‎memory, with viewing urban space as a mean of narrating the country's national memory and ‎reflecting the citizens' current thoughts, as a try of nearing the distances between ‎competing ‎narratives. Therefore, the research aims at developing a methodological framework that should ‎contribute to renationalizing memory through urban space. Further, benefiting from the German experience by investigating lessons to learn. That is based on the hypothesis that, although there is no fixed formula for all countries to renationalize the historical ‎consciousness of memory through urban spaces, lessons to be learned from Germany experience ‎could be a driving dimension when designing Egyptian urban spaces with a concept of memory ‎as an essential factor. To guide the validity of the study's hypothesis, a set of research questions are thus ‎formulated: Starting from why memory is an essential factor when designing urban spaces? ‎Regarding Egypt national memory, how it was constituted through history and how to read its ‎representation on urban spaces? Also, the study quests the means of nationalizing memory ‎through urban spaces? And What are the learned lessons from the German experience?‎ The study tries to answer those questions. Via an inductive ‎analytical ‎methodology ‎which ‎moves from the gap of knowledge and from a particular situation ‎in Egypt, to study the German ‎experience in renationalizing the concept of memory through urban spaces.‎ ‎ Within the scope of the study, exploring Egypt prevailing narratives and the inherited ‎concepts which influenced the national memory is essential. Moreover, the research develops ‎analytical political psychosocial model that could help reading memories in urban spaces, ‎memory's actors, and memory influences. To validate this model, case studies are analysed in ‎light of the concluded aspects. Consequently, the expected result is to infer broad general ‎learned ‎lessons for the Egyptian case. ‎ Research findings and conclusions answer the research questions, interpret literature ‎review, recommend some guide points to three target groups: first, practice field; to encourage ‎designers to value the national and collective memories when designing urban spaces. Second, to ‎ask policymakers to take the public participation into consideration, when taking decisions related to urban ‎development. Third, the thesis recommends future researches of urban memory that connect ‎theoretical information with the practice field. ‎ Finally, enhancing the memory-work in relation to the national narrative, conveying a meaningful message, when ‎designing urban spaces could encourage citizens to learn, to interact, and to dissolve boundaries ‎between the competing narratives in post-conflict societies.‎}, subject = {Erinnerung}, language = {en} }